ipl-logo

No Child Left Behind Act (Nclba)

792 Words4 Pages

The "No Child Left Behind Act" (P. L. 107-110) is a federal act which establishes a regime of statewide achievement tests in reading or language arts, math, and science that states must follow in order to receive a grant under Title I, Part A of the act (USDOE). This Title I grant is the largest federal grant to states and local school districts for the education of disadvantaged children. States receive millions of dollars in annual funding for their schools which are tied to the requirements found within the "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLBA). The tests the act requires compose the key components of the NCLBA standards and accountability framework. Test results provide the basis for measuring state, school district, and school progress …show more content…

They must be the primary means of determining the yearly performance of the state, each school district, and each school in meeting the act's academic achievement standards. The achievement standards must be aligned with state content standards, and have three levels of achievement or mastery - basic, proficient, and advanced. (Common Core State Standards Initiative) Any test administered must be the same for all children (there are allowable accommodations for certain students); be aligned with state content and achievement standards; provide coherent information about students' attainment of the standards; and be valid and reliable for the purposes for which they are used and consistent with relevant nationally recognized professional and technical standards (Yell). Tests must objectively measure achievement, knowledge, and skills and not evaluate personal or family beliefs or disclose personally identifiable information. They must allow specific itemized score analyses for students in major racial and ethnic groups and for LEP, disabled, and economically disadvantaged students to allow parents, teachers, and administrators to interpret and address students' specific needs

Show More
Related

  • Child Left Behind Dbq

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    No Child Left Behind was passed by congress and was signed by President George Bush. The federal role was holding schools accountable for the students academic success due to No Child Left Behind law. Standard testing were given to ensuring that states and schools were performing and were achieving at a certain level. If states did not comply with the new requirements of No Child Left Behind then they were at risk of losing federal funding. The No Child Left Behind was ultimately created to change the fact that American education system was considered internationally competitive­­.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Missouri School Improvement Program

    346 Words  | 2 Pages

    These standards encourage schools for unremitting improvement and innovation, categorize performance of schools and districts, and establish the state’s expectations while also empowering all participants. Annual

    Read More

  • Lyndon B Johnson War Of Poverty Essay

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act required more responsibility from the students of the school and more responsibility from the teachers of the school. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act was then reauthorized again in 2015 by the President Barack Obama. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act was then named the Every Student Succeeds Act. The Every Student Succeeds Act was a United States law that was passed in December of 2015. This Act was made to govern the United States K–12 public education

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    This non-periodical web source gives a brief overview of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. To start off, standardized testing is explained in detail, giving specific examples under the 2002 law of what tests are required at certain ages. The main idea is the goal of the No Child Left Behind Act, which is to shorten the educational gap between regular and advanced students. There are four pillars of the bill; accountability, flexibility, research-based education and parent options. The source further explains the pillars, for example, “Accountability: to ensure those students who are disadvantaged, achieve academic

    Read More

  • Texas Accountability System History

    1124 Words  | 5 Pages

    This new assessment tool had two major impacts. First, the expectations for individual students were raised by increasing the difficulty of the material on the assessment—no longer were the tests considered minimal skills tests. Passing each of the reading, writing and mathematics components of the grade 10 test, also known as the exit-level exam, was a requirement for receiving a high school diploma in the state. Second, schools were also held to higher standards with the expectation that not only the campus as whole but the specific subpopulations (African-American, Caucasian, Hispanic, and Economically Disadvantaged) had to achieve minimal standards. Passing rates on these standardized exams, along with attendance and drop-out data were used to assign schools accountability ratings with severe repercussions mandated for schools that were placed at the low end of the accountability scale (Texas Education Agency et al.,

    Read More

  • Title I Compliance Report

    603 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a result of NCLB creating standard-based expectations by implementing a rigid accountability system, schools identified as Title I programs failed to achieve NCLB standards.(7) Title I programs are designed to decrease the academic achievement gap between disadvantaged and advantaged students; the program specifically aims at school districts and schools that include low-income families. The NCLB Act required Title I program schools to achieve a series of academic performances, which are based on each state’s academic content and academic achievement standards in reading/language arts, mathematics, and science to attain Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) (5).The AYP goals are set for the achievement for all students and for subgroups of students, such as major ethical/racial groups, economically disadvantaged students, limited English proficient students, and students with disabilities;(2) the AYP allows the government to determine if states, schools districts, and schools achieve NCLB’s standard of reaching proficiency levels in reading/language arts and mathematics by the 2013-2014 school year.

    Read More

  • Common Core State Standards

    1162 Words  | 5 Pages

    With that being said, Common core developers have outlined the approach to assessing. To avoid layering on top of other assessments already being used, teachers and administrators will need to examine their assessment approaches so that testing continues to add to, rather than take away from teaching young children. To direct teachers in this approach, they would need to become familiar with the guidelines provided in the Common Core Standards. Next, in reference to assessment results being used for high-stakes such as grade retention, Common Core

    Read More

  • Child Left Behind Act: Reauthorization Of The Elementary And Secondary Education Act Of 1965

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act was a re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, the federal law regulating grades k through 12 education. The ESEA was the first that was enacted in 1965 and reauthorized in 1994. The law states a Title I, the flagship program for the disadvantaged students. The core of the NCLB tried to improve achievements through annual regular assessment for students, so quantifying education progress and making schools accountable for the performance of the students.

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing Dbq

    1130 Words  | 5 Pages

    Even though many students absolutely hate them, state assessments are a big part of the American education system. Everyone has taken a standardized test at some point in their life, and almost everyone has done poorly on one. They are primarily used as a measurement of how well students learn, but are they truly accurate? There are strong arguments on both sides, which has started a heated conflict about the productiveness of these tests. Standardized testing has been around for many years, starting in Imperial China where it was intended to determine a person’s aptitude for a government position (“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?”).

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind: A Failing Attempt At Reform Analysis

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    Later the Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) forced ESEA to analyze the scores of students not just for achievement but to measure the pedagogical levels of teachers . However schools who did not perform at the desired level endure no consequences. This eventually led to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing Research Paper

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    Standardized tests are very common in today’s modern society. They are used as a tool to measure a person’s performance and indicate how their estimated performance will be in a college class. Every year hundreds of students take the ACT or SAT in order to get accepted into their college of choice and to receive scholarships, but they fail to see the problems with these standardized tests. As more and more people take these tests, the national average score falls causing doubt in the extremely important system. This is leading people to question whether or not the ACT and SATs are accomplishing what they were created to do.

    Read More

  • Nclb Act Pros And Cons

    247 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although the NCLB Act implemented in 2001 has shown great efforts for trying to ensure the equality for all students, it does not successfully provide effective achievement for minorities, underprivileged kids, or students with disabilities across the nation. Implementers of the NCLB Act should create a more personalized version to accommodate children with certain disabilities in addition to the regular version of the act. The NCLB Act that was created in 2001 ensures that regular children capable of learning like the average student get the appropriate service to react to the government’s state academic assessments, but those who require special accommodations although have been successful enough to improve test scores, still are not meeting

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing In Public Schools

    1191 Words  | 5 Pages

    School’s are using standardized testing for the wrong reason. “A standardized test is any examination that’s administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. There are two major kinds of standardized tests: aptitude tests and achievement tests” (Popham, 1999). The most common examples of aptitude tests are the SAT and the

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement: The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

    1749 Words  | 7 Pages

    Introduction Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. Thesis Statement Standardized tests should not be eliminated completely, but should rather be evaluated in addition to other factors such as grades, extracurricular activities, and volunteer hours. This would take pressure off of students during standardized tests, allow colleges to see how well-rounded the students are, and give students who are better in other areas

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing Pros And Cons

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 2001 George W. Bush in started the no child left behind program. This program stated that children from grades three through twelve should be given a standardized test at the end of their course. The original purpose of these tests was to hold educators accountable for their teaching method. While the no child left behind program (NCLB) might have made teachers actually teach, there has been some bad effects to this program. Some of the bad effects of the program are the stress put on children, the inaccuracy of the standardized test and finally the tremendous cost of these tests.

    Read More

More about No Child Left Behind Act (Nclba)

Open Document