No Name Woman And La Frontera Anzaldúa Analysis

Two things that were extremely important to the basic societal functions of colonial American society were women and the church. Much different from today’s world, woman’s main purpose in this society was to give birth to children and provide dowries to their husbands at marriage. The church was obviously there to provide a moral compass and rule to the people of this age. How do women and the church relate however? The relationship between these figures however is important to understanding how colonial Latin America worked especially when we discuss marriage and social standing.

The role of women in society for both NOW and Schlafly was defined by the each thought women’s main goal in life was. NOW believed this to be able to ‘develop to their fullest human potential.’ This meant no choosing between motherhood and a potential profession. This also meant that women should not be limited by the expectation that a women must retire to raise their children. They argued for the institution of child-care centers and programs that would help women who chose to temporarily leave the workforce re-enter with something other than an entry level position.

All in the Puritan community thought of females much like children in the way that they should be seen and not heard. These absurd rules were even in their bibles. Verses insinuated that women couldn't have their own minds and that they decision making process for everything should be left up to their husbands (Glubok 30). Furthermore rights were so limited that they were almost completely dependent on men: “A wife’s dependence became not only a matter of cultural, social, and legal restrictions, but necessarily of concrete economics as women moved from the households of fathers to husbands.” (Westerkamp 14).

When talking about gender roles in Hispanic culture, you will likely encounter the fact that mother's’ role is to be passive and must be willing to dedicate themselves for their families. ”(source:http://nlcatp.org/gender-roles-in-hispanic-culture/).Which means that in the Latino culture the women are seen to be beas responsible,caring about their religion as a whole,and etc. So they are seen to always trying to give up things and to take care of the family but this

Women were considered inferior to men; they had to rights and most of all no voice. Typically, as the old saying goes ‘they were to be seen and not hear’. Revolutionary Mothers, by Carol Berkin tells of the general stereotypes of women in America, the roles in which they played during the America revolution, and lastly it tells the story of the women through their own words. Stereotypes of Women In chapter one, Berkin states “God had created her to be a helpmate to man….and formed her for this purpose…to be frugal, and obedient (2005, p.4)”.

The right that women have today is not what it was in the Progressive Era. Women did not have the right to wear what they want, to do what they want, and to choose what they are going to be in the future. Their future was chosen by the society and that was to become a housewife. In this era while women were told how to behave, men were free to become whatever they wanted to be and to do what they wanted. Eventually, this inequality lead to various revolution that was related to women’s right, one of the activists that lead these revolutions was Charlotte Perkins Gilman.

What Mademoiselle Reisz is saying to Edna is that she needs to be the type of woman that defies what people say and doesn’t care what others think. Obviously she does not think she can be a great artist because she is married to her husband and is expected to listen to him. Edna takes it as a challenge and throughout the story she acts as an independent person to prove to Mademoiselle Reisz that she is

Since the beginning of time women have had different roles than men. Women have been the ones to take care of the family in the home and men have been the ones to take care of the financial needs. In the 20’s women began to realize that they were worth more than a housewife and began to change their roles. Women had to fight for their rights to change roles, leading up to events that show their determination for suffrage, and their right to work and be whomever they wanted to be. Women were not given their roles and a question asked is, “Why did they have to fight for them?”

The government should not try and get rid of programs like this that help women with their choices and giving a woman a voice. Pro life wants that to happen, even all these choices this country has to offer pro-life still goes against it and thinks it is a religious matter that the government should handle, not the one dealing with it physically or emotionally. This is a country that was built on choices made and backing up those choices. The women who make these choices have to live with that choice after it has been made for the rest of their lives. Again good, bad, right, or wrong, it is them who have to live with it no one else.

Before the 1820’s women were viewed as objects rather than actual spouses. Women 's duties were to take care of children without complaining and from birth were expected to live up to the role of being a mother of many children and to serve their husbands as a domestic employee. Women were considered the weaker vessel, because they are inferior in structure and in physical strength. Many people of the time believed that women should not stray from the traditional paths and should continue to be delicate women working to cook, clean, and care for the children. Individuals such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton opposed traditional women’s gender roles and took apart of the Seneca Falls Convention that called for suffrage rights for women.

She may have family and or financial problems preventing her from being able to properly care for the child. Women are forced to hear both sides of the debate and feel the intensity of a decision. Abortion is the said woman’s private decision and should not be stopped by any law. Only the woman herself knows her body, so abortion is a choice based solely on her feelings. The court case of Roe vs Wade established that

The subhuman treatment of women is articulated, “To accept an openly acknowledged role for women in the public sector was to invite extraordinary hostility and ridicule” (Kerber 3). It was seen as a societal norm to ignore the works of women, and allot solely motherly chores. Rather than the belief that women are not capable, the author argues that it is tradition for women to be kept in the shadows for political issues. The author describes the ideal Republican Mother as one who sets up the future for her sons rather than her own future. Reflecting on the role of women today, it is evident that they have developed from being underestimated to key contributors within

I want to make myself” (Morrison 92). Sula longs to be an individual in a world which tells women they must find a husband to be whole. Even as a child, Sula knew she must create herself to gain the freedom she did not have as a Black woman. “Because each had discovered years before that they were neither white nor male, and that all freedom and triumph was forbidden to them, they had to set about creating something else” (Morrison 52). Because of their race and gender, Sula and Nel will never experience the luxury of automatic freedom.