No warrant should be needed for search and seizures
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."
Matthew 5:9 In this essay I will write about no warrant should be needed for search and seizure, to begin let me explain you what is a warrant. Also, in my personal opinion I believe that for you to have an opinion of this type of this topic we have the duty to research if the people involved with this method have rights and if there's a law behind this. The definition of warrant ,is a legal order signed by a judge authorizing the police to search specific locaiton and seize specific materials from that location at a specified time. Throughout the years, we have noticed at movies, TV shows and news the way the police arrest the "bad guys". Obviously we had
…show more content…
After he suspects, the next step is to confiscate any suspicious material and personal belongings. A lot of people complain about this confiscation method because they believe or in their personal opinions you shouldn't judge anyone. Although, in some countries you are judged by your exterior look, which means the clothes you are wearing, if you have tattoos or piercings. For example in Honduras, we can easily identify a person who belongs to a gang. It is unbelievable that in our country that for people to recognize the murderers, in the news like Canal 6, Televicentro and Canal 11, they make live so the people can identify them,the police tell them to get on their knees, then they lift up their shirt and show the audience their tattoos, so people can have they possibility to identify them. This tattoo thing have become an argument throughout the years, nowadays a lot of things have changed in the way we think or visualize things, I truly believe that is like a "modern" renaissance for example, now people argue that you shouldn't be judged if you have a tattoo that doesn't mean you are part of a gang. So, as I've been writing some examples of
Consent to a search- is the process where an individual gives his or her consent to an officer or voluntarily permit a police officer before he conducts a search for his or her property. There is no warrant required for this process. Consent to a search must be voluntarily and not pressured. Furthermore, the police cannot search a home when one person invites them while another person refuses to grant them the visit. 2.
The 4th amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” In the context of the 4th amendment, a search is considered or happens, “when a governmental employee or agent of the government violates an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy.” (Ryan) An example of a search under the 4th amendment is forms of searches such as stip searches or visual body searches but they have to be supported by a probable cause and be conducted in a reasonable matter. A seizure of an individual under the 4th amendment means or happens , “when the police's conduct would communicate to a reasonable person, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the encounter, that the person is not free to ignore the police presence and leave at his will.”
Starting on the path of positive development, increased visibility of police officer’s conduct allows for them to not only be held accountable for any misconduct, but realize that potential is there and thus, change their actions accordingly. The prevalence of camera phones allows the public to become “citizen journalists” and record events happening around them, while uploading these recordings on social media, allows a vaster public eye to discuss (and form opinions on) the situation from a secondary view (Brown, 2016, p.293). These online discussions which then form movements, petitions and hashtags do not go unnoticed by officers. Instead, they have a significant impact on how they conduct themselves during risky situations with offenders. In, The Blue Line on Thin Ice: Police Use of Force Modifications in the Era of Cameraphones and YouTube, Brown goes into an account of a Canadian “street cop” responding to a call about a problematic drunken man who had
He finds that when the police are viewed as legitimate, members of the public are more likely to comply with the law and cooperate with the police in solving crimes. He points out that “studies also support the argument that single experiences can have an impact on attitudes or behaviors [with police] (Tyler 36). He also highlights the impact of social and economic conditions on policing, such as poverty, unemployment, and racial inequality. He argues that these factors can contribute to negative perceptions of the police and undermine trust in law enforcement.
Tattooing has been around for nearly as long as humans have been. For example, the oldest revelation of tattooed human skin was found approximately 6000 BC on the upper lip of a Chinchorro culture mummy from South America. The oldest direct evidence for tattooing in Europe is the body of Ötzi the Iceman, which dates back to the late fourth millennium BC. The argument makes a claim of value, because she firmly states her opinions in defense of body art. The essay was written on the 6th of April in 2010.
They argue that a suspect should be perceived as innocent until proven guilty (Shelden, 2006). Also, the police officers have undergone massive training on the rights of human beings. Rarely will a police officer use excessive force to control crime. Unless in self-defense or a situation where it is deemed necessary the policing has been ‘softer’ in this age in fighting crime as compared as it was then back in the
Whether it be a dragon, tribal marking, Asian character, or a simple phrase, thousands of people get tattoos daily. Tattoos play a significant role in self-expression and identity since ancient times. Tattoos can be recreational, cultural, symbolic, or just stylistic. For some people, it is an expression of identity and personal beliefs. This is exactly the case for Leslie Jamison.
The Fourth Amendment protects all citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment states any form of stalking, any form of eavesdropping, any form of searching and seizing are a violation of the 4th Amendment. This protects everyone of the United States(Oyez). Searching or seizing anything from someone in a private area without a
Police Brutality in Relation to the Ineffectiveness of Body Cameras. In their article, “Body Cameras Worn by Police are No ‘Safeguard of Truth,’ Experts Say”, Vivian Yee and Kirk Johnson emphasize on how body cameras are not effective enough to prevent police brutality against American citizens. A grand jury found out that innocent African American Men's’ rights are not being considered when they are been brutally beaten by the police. As a result, the grand jury’s solution to this problem was to create a law that forces police officers to wear body cameras when they are in the act of arresting their victims.
Tattoos were considered low class. My parents raised me differently how to interpret tattoos. Back home during the eighties tattoos signifies nothing but negativity. It has a bad connotation to us. Personally, I admit I was judgmental about my friend’s living in the Haight Asbury.
Police officers are sworn in with the responsibility of serving and protecting the public. Members of the public expect their local police departments to keep their community safe, and protect them from danger and harm. Lately, police-citizen relationships have been strained as a result of problematic police behaviors and citizen encounters. Police use-of-force has become a pressing issue in modern society and has caused distrust and a lack of confidence in law enforcement agencies. Tragedies such as the deaths of Michael Brown, Erick Garner, and Sandra Bland has fueled the public’s outrage and suspicion of local police officers.
It can get worser because the police is judging by their looks and their action. There are lot of times where the police suspect someone with proof
This is a quote that i found and i totally agree with it. “Tattoos are like stories-they 're symbolic of the important moments in your
I think authority and strict police encounters are a great thing that helps offenders realize the consequences of their actions. Sometimes the only way to get an offender under control is to use unarmed physical force or force using non-lethal weapons. Every day, police officers encounter countless hours of training to defuse situations that can be violent. In Philadelphia, every officer gets 40 hours of this reality training to learn tactics other than lethal force…even when suspects are armed and dangerous (PBS, 2016).
Once the survey was conducted, the results were tabulated and analysed so that a conclusion could be determined. In this study, southern Canadians are questioned about their motivations to get tattoos, and results are compared to ancient tattoo traditions from other cultures to conclude that southern Canadians, more often than not, do attach profound personal meaning to their tattoos. To understand why a person might tattoo their skin, a practice known to be permanent and painful, research was directed toward the history of tattooing. It was discovered that the art of skin modification had been traced back to 5300 years ago by dating a mummified corpse ordained with tattoos (Haskings-Winner, Collichaw, Kritzer, & Warecki, 2011). The tattoos of