Noli And El Fili Analysis

1022 Words5 Pages

Whenever Rizal’s name is brought up, the two books Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo are always hung on it. These are two books that Rizal originally penned was not just a novel but a form of commentary towards society and politics. His work intended to wake Filipinos in deep slumber while Spaniards rule over them. This means igniting their sense of national identity by exposing the dirts and malices of Spanish authorities. Throughout his writing he also revealed the social cancer that eats away the tissues of Philippine society, namely: corruption by many friars and officials who used religion to acquire power, also hypocrisy of the friars, the ignorance of the people of their own religion and due to lack of education, the indolences, pretentiousness of Indios and cowardice two voice out and fight against their tyrants. Unlike other many works of fictions, Noli and El Fili are true stories of Philippine condition during the last reigning of Spanish regime. The places, the characters and …show more content…

Some people think Noli is better than Fili and some says otherwise. Rizal himself considered Noli is superior to El Fili as a novel. However, his bosom friend Blumentritt and Lopez Jaena opined that Fili is superior to Noli. Anyway, both novels are good and realistic since they viewed the history. Both are highly influential because it served as the instrument for the holistic transformation of nation. Through this, he really proved that pen is way too mightier than a sword. Although he died because of these two books, but there has been ‘life’ after his death. Filipinos were awakened with soul restored, our country achieved independence from colonial oppressors. Had it not been for him we would still be under corrupt officialdom, our rights denied to us and receive discrimination as people of inferior. You see, it is no mistake that there is FILI and NOLI in

Open Document