It was a right given to them by a case back in 1985, in which a person was killed by deadly force. Nevertheless, that is why sometimes police officers might get away with the killing of a citizen because there is not enough evidence that the use of force was not necessary. If these cameras are installed in officers uniforms the use of force will definitely decrease and will make the community feel safer and police officers gain more respect from the public. Finally, if the use of force is not necessary then a police officer can get suspend from the department after a judge has viewed the happenings of the case. The uses of cameras will not only make police officers use less force and the public feel safer, but it will also help the country become a safer place
Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws. In past circumstances when guns were banned, criminals were the kind of people that the government wanted to make sure did not have guns. In reality, they were always the ones who still had the guns (Lott). People can say that gun crime is a serious firearm problem, but guns are not always the exact cause of the crime. Even if the government tries to deny groups access to guns, they could still find their way around the law and gain access to one
All these shooting all over the United States. Gun violence is generally the problem. Guns being misused, guns being used to hurt others or themselves. Gun control laws should be enforced because it will lead to less suicides, less money being spent on gun related accidents, and to protect women from domestic violence. Gun control laws should be enforced because it will lead to fewer suicides.
Next, some people say that they feel safe and secure when they have the right to bear arms as it can protect them from bad guys. However, with guns, people usually die. Moreover, without proper training it is also not safe to the users. This is the modern world, if someone kills someone or hurts someone in your family or you, does not give you the right to use deadly weapons to defend yourself. There are services which are there to protect people.
A hidden corner would be better since no one would suspect there is anything there. 2. Prying of your gun safe Thieves would most probably try to break into your gun safe by using crowbars, levers or even pry-bars. If the quality and design of your safe are of low standard, then the buglers would find it easy to pry its door open. If your gun safe door could be twisted out of shape, then your firearms and rifles could be
So even if more gun regulations were adding it would change much. “Assault weapons” aren’t as powerful as the military weapons. Furthermore, the amount of crimes doesn’t correlate with the “assault weapons” so that means that the assault weapon bans laws will not reduce crimes and criminals will often find a way around the laws. Therefore, even if more laws or regulations were to be added the criminals will not even follow them most of the time so there 's no point in
While gun control has little noticeable benefits, there are some points to mention. One of those points being that if one could find a way to actually ban guns and get rid of them so that no one anywhere could have access to a firearm, murder rates as well as maybe even crime would decrease simply because guns make it so much easier to do both of those things. Guns are dangerous and used in the wrong hands can bring destruction to anyone unlucky enough to be involved, including whoever is using the gun. The idea of Gun Control and what it means can vary widely, with big issue being what it would actually accomplish, if anything. One thing to consider with gun safety in mind is that in Chicago, Illinois, which has the most strict laws in the whole of the entire country, has the highest percentage of gun violence in the whole of the United States (Stell).
Accordingly, the psychology of stand your ground laws can be analogized to the psychology of defensive gun use. Most gun owners feel safer from crime because they own a gun.88 They can rest in assurance that a means of protection is available to them if the need were to arise. In the same way, many stand your ground supporters seem to feel safer because of the laws.89 it implies that law-abiding citizens believe criminals will be less likely to target those who refuse to take it—in other words, the people who will respond with deadly force instead of retreating first if someone targets them for a
We are unable to tell whether Seung-Hui Cho's act of the mass killings could have been stopped but what we do know is that strict gun control laws do not always have the effect that lawmakers want to see. Having guns in the right hands can be influential in stopping crime and having fewer guns in the wrong hands can make for more crime. Therefore, this makes gun control not equivalent to crime