A non-lethal weapon that can replace a gun is….
Which non-lethal weapon has the best chance of replacing the gun? There are a few weapons that I think that has a good chance of being a good non-lethal weapon. Would you like to be in a world where you don’t have to worry about the law enforcement killing you with a lethal weapon. When people are by the police they usually get a little scared or get on edge. I know people would love to feel safe when they are encountered by a law enforcement official. There aren’t many weapons out there that could replace the gun. I think that there really isn’t a non-lethal weapon out there that won’t kill but at the same time be effective in stopping criminals. There are weapons that are less deadlier than the gun but most kill you. I think a good replacement for lethal guns are taser guns, and the taser x26. These weapons cause the least deaths but they are still effective in self protection and stopping criminals. If taser guns replace the regular lethal weapons in law enforcement there will be less long term injuries and less casualties. If there are less deaths there will be less hate for the police and less lawsuits. With less hate for the police there will be less violent protests and anger, but most importantly we are trying to figure out which weapons could replace the
…show more content…
The Greek Police Special Forces used them to end the A310 Turkish Airline hijacking at Athens International Airport in March 2003 (4. BeijingTimes). “Sometimes the police use these weapons to stop drug suspects. City police stun a man, 32, when he tries to run after a traffic stop at North Main Avenue and Bedford Street during which officers find heroin in his vehicle. A drug suspect, 26, is subdued with a Taser when he struggles with city officers trying to arrest him on South Washington Avenue. City police use a Taser on a drug suspect, 23, when he resists arrest on South Main Avenue.”
A possible concern is threatening weapons that are used too often when a person is causing a crime. For example, crimes all over the world have steered to atrocious incidents caused by concealed guns. This implies that the use of guns is taken for granted all over the world. This means that concealed guns have been the cause of a numerous amount dangers popping up around the world. However, “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.”
It’s a cold winter morning, and a police officer is patrolling his normal route. Born and raised in this small Midwestern town, he is now starting his own family here. He rarely sees any excitement at 3 A.M., but he spots a car swerving as he passes it on a country highway. He turns around and pulls the car over to find that the driver is his neighbor. It is not a rare occurrence that it is someone he knows in such a small community.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Is Tim Morgan liable for assault and battery with a dangerous weapon under Massachusetts law where a weapon can be either inherently dangerous or dangerous as used? Is a foam hand inherently dangerous, meaning that it is designed to inflict serious injury, when it is a novelty item used at sporting events? Is a foam hand dangerous as used, meaning that it was used in a manned likely to cause injury when it was used with intent and force to hit and push Mr. Kramer and caused him to fall down rows of stadium seating and sustain injuries? DISCUSSION Mr. Morgan will likely be held liable for assault and battery with a dangerous weapon.
Some days crime rates are up and then the next they are down, what we do know is that America is becoming safer. In 2005, 11,346 persons were killed by firearm violence 477,040 persons were victims of a crime committed with a firearm, (National Institute of Justice). Surprisingly, a lot of gun violence in America is related to self defense. Between 1987 and 1990 it was found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents (0.2%) that occurred in this time frame.
Firearms, handguns especially, are the weapon of choice in the majority of these homicides. While Chicago does have a reputation for rather firm gun laws they are not as severe as they once were (Fessenden and Park, New York Times). Completely banning ownership of all handguns is not the way to go, however punishment for illegally owned handguns needs to be more severe. Right now, the punishment for illegally owning a handgun is a one year sentence (Fessenden and Park, New York Times). One year is not enough to scare people into not illegal possessing a handgun.
Thorough studies examine that the distribution of less-lethal weapons have reduced issues such as assaults on specifically police officers, other studies examine that this is increasing the death and injuries of civilians rather than focusing primarily on the safety of officers employed for the police force. It is a growing problem in the United States with increasing health issues related to the cause of police use of force in incidents that occur regularly. It is important to consider whether these less-lethal weapons are associated with the like hood of injuries. The use of force can define a wide range of different variables of force; it is vital to assess the independent contribution of less-lethal weapons on the prevalence and incidence of injury to the suspects and officers involved. Less- lethal weapons have increased the odds of injury to suspects that may be life threatening, it is most likely essential for these officers to stick to less-lethal weapons which can be classified as OC sprays or CEDs.
Although firearms are still highly debated as dangerous or, it has been proved many times that because of guns, the number of crimes have been reduced; plus having these firearms create a sense of safety and
‘’Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).. In 2014, the CDC reported that 11,008 of the 15,872 homicides committed in the United States that year involved a firearm. Of the 42,826 suicides reported that year, 21,386 involved a firearm. These statistics have inspired efforts at the federal and state levels to enact gun control legislation to reduce crime and violence’’(‘’Gun Control’’). According to the statistic guns are held for over 33,000 deaths in the United States.
This type of gun should remain for military use only and not be an easy access to the
Society as a whole has become less and less violent. Since 1991, reported crimes committed has dropped by almost double (Statista.com). Many people blame the AR-15 for most of the mass murders in America, and ask for the “assault” weapon to be banned. However, many details of the gun are skewed. In an article written by Margot Sanger-Katz of The New York Times, she stated that of all the gun deaths in America, 60% were suicides; and even more contrary to belief, nearly double of the mass killings (4 or more deaths) were with handguns instead of rifles (statista.com).
Gangsters might be gone ,but criminals are still around and they use assault weapons for their preference of mass murdering. Assault weapons should be banned. Assault weapons are far more dangerous than other guns. They shoot nearly a thousand bullets in a few seconds. This makes them more deadly than several handguns or other firearms that are not automatic.
For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that
It is possible to reduce the number of fatalities caused by guns through implementing stricter gun laws. This solution has proven success as it has previously worked for the United Kingdom when there was a lock down on gun crime after the Dunblane shooting. This caused the United Kingdoms death rate to drastically decrease while Americas death rate has been continually rising. This shows that
You probably already know that stun guns and other non lethal self defense products have been successfully used for decades by military and law enforcement personnel. Their track record proves it. Because law enforcement resources are limited, police just can 't do it all. The civilian must step up and assume more responsibility for our own self defense.
Introduction People usually ask about the best and most effective martial art to learn for self defense. No specific answer can be given to that question because situations that demand self defense are completely different from martial arts. For a street fight, there are no rules, there can be more than one opponent and there will be no protective gear to protect one punches and being kicked around on hard surfaces. In a street fight, anything is possible.