Non Sex Offenders Case Study

There are different types of sex offenders which make recidivism complex to handle. Unfortunately, recidivism remains a difficult concept to measure, especially in the context of sex offenders. The surreptitious nature of sex crimes, the fact that few sexual offenses are reported to authorities, and variation in the ways researchers calculate recidivism rates all contribute to the problem.

The purpose of this paper is to look at recidivism rates among adult and juvenile sex offenders, and male and female sex offenders, in order to better understand who is likely to recidivate and why.

Bronfenbrenner (1979)’s ecological system theory of development provides an understanding of how interplay of factors influences a child development. His theory of ecological system proposes that the family system must maintain some degree of balance for continued existence. Furthermore, the theory links child abuse and dysfunctional family patterns and the onset of personality disorders including sexual abuse. Perpetrators of sexual abuse engage in this type of crime as result of deviant in their psychological make up. Social relationships and the world around a child, affect a child 's development (Bronfenbrenner, 1979, as cited in Mullins, 2014). The micro system (family, peers and caregivers) is the one that is the closest to a child as

In todays society, many civilians believe there is no, nor ever will be any hope to rehabilitate sex offenders. Little do they know criminologists, psychologists and researchers have found programs that prevent recidivism from occurring. Today, there is hope to rehabilitate sex offenders with help of five different national sex offender programs. These programs include; High Intensity National Sex Offenders Program, Moderate Intensity National Sex Offenders Program, National Sex Offender Maintenance Program, Tupiq Program for Inuit Men Offenders, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. These programs are shown to have achieved great success, and will be further assessed throughout the essay.

Juvenile delinquency usually refers to an offence perpetrated by a juvenile. The term “Juvenile delinquent” was established legally in order to save juveniles from the social stigma of being classified in legal records. According to an official report of Australian Institute of Criminology, juvenile offender rates have generally been twice as high as adult ones (Australian Institute of Criminology, 2015). According to Australian bureau of statistics youth offenders comprised nearly a third (29%) of the total offender population, well above this age group 's proportion in the overall Australian population (15%) (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012). This research will primarily focus on three major issues which can be held responsible

A study found that one-third of sex offenders surveyed on the register in Florida experience some sort of adverse consequence such as acts of vigilantism and harassment, inability for offenders to find jobs and housing, housing prices lower in communities with sex offenders and loss of friends and family support. The two main rationales behind community notification are enhancing public safety and reducing recidivism. However many studies have proven that community notification does not enhance public safety or reduce recidivism, the consequences for the offender are mainly negative and will not assist in rehabilitation into

Street gangs and associated problems is a complex issue to describe as they are growing strong and wittier as they have started their activities using technology and internet. The crucial matters that Criminal Justice System is facing about the street gangs and their related activities of violence and drugs can

Although there is some scientific evidence that implies the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions for most criminal offenders, the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders is unknown and remains to be a hot subject of debate for most people. Treatment ultimately depends on the individual and the contextual factors, like a former child abuse victim. With studies, conclusions are not supported and the conducted research is not reliable or valid for that matter. The quality of the research and its consistent results make up the heart of trustworthy research. The quality of research studies continues to change and so do the defining characteristics of the experiments, these consist of narrative reviews, synthesis research, quasi-experiments, and so

The huge bulk of juveniles don’t commit serious offenses or minor offenses. Certain will commit status offenses, which convey to their age, like smoking cigarettes and marijuana, consumption liquor, running away from home. Juveniles commit grave offenses for lots of causes. They may have a core alcohol or drug issue. Females with mental illness are further likely to hurt themselves.

Throughout the years, people have always wondered what motivates a sexual offender to keep reoffending and whether these acts are random or not. However, this subject has been very controversial and very broad. Although theorists have come up with several theories of why sexual offenders commit such acts and keep reoffending, there tends to be another explanation. According to Terry, the offense cycle describes several “cognitive processes that the offender uses to be able to continue offending” (Terry, 2014, pg. 71)

According to Community Supervision (2001), it is imperative that sex offenders are supervised intensely. However, there are numerous aspects about the offender that an officer, therapist, or any other staff pertinent to the care of the offender should consider. First, it is recommended to know the employment status, family situations, peers, relationships, etc. These factors can help paint a picture of who the offender is. According to Latessa, Listwan, & Koetzle, (2014), an RNR approach is extremely useful, especially when on officer uses all these proponent of this model, risk, need, and responsivity. These types of offenders are all different as mentioned by Losel & Schumucker (2005), and they all have varying characteristics such as age,

The view that involvement in crime diminishes with age is one of the oldest and most widely accepted in criminology. Beginning with the pioneering research by Adolphe Quetelet in the early nineteenth century, criminological research consistently has confirmed that (the proportion of) the population involved in crime tends to peak in adolescence or early adulthood and then decline with age. This age-crime relationship is remarkably similar across historical periods, geographic locations, and crime types.

That the recent years have also seen an urge for an objective review of the

R. Sharma*, Sangeet Dhillon** & Sarmadi Bano noted that childhood incidents and experiences are significant in the development of criminality; on the other hand, it does not mean criminals expose their criminality early in life Causes of Juvenile delinquency required to understand from sociological theories of juvenile delinquency, these theories put prominence on the environment, social structures and the learning process. Yet, many factors that take part in vital part in a youngster’s delinquent behavior (B. R. Sharma*, Sangeet Dhillon** & Sarmadi Bano, 2009). The study by B. R Sharma, Sangeeth Dhillon and Sarmadi Bano (2009) they mentioned individual factors cause for Juvenile delinquency. Individual factors are personality traits like submissiveness, defiance, hostility, impulsiveness, feeling of insecurity, fear, lack of self-control and emotional conflicts whereas situational factors are family, companions, movies, school environment, work environment