How far could the historian make use of sources 8 and 12 to investigate the extent to which the lives of the English people were transformed by the Norman conquest?
Both source eight and source twelve provide a perspective into life of the people of England after the Norman conquest. Source eight, an extract from the Domesday book which was used to provide William with the information he needed about what the people of England had in terms of what they owned. Source eight makes a comparison between the taxation the people of Herefordshire owed King Edward to the taxation that those owed King William. The other source, twelve, was written by the monks of Peterborough who formed part of the King’s obituary, who detail their opinion of the King whom had just died.
The content of source eight is somewhat useful in investigating
…show more content…
It suggests the relationship between the people of Herefordshire and the King. For example, when a ‘burgess serving with a horse died the King had his horse and weapons’ and in return for this the King would govern and protect in the best way he could. This shows the usefulness of the source to a historian as suggests that the relationship between the regular English man and the Saxon King was very unequal but there was mutual respect as the two relied on each other. A good relationship between King and subjects after the Norman conquest would have improved the lives of the English people as he was the overall decision maker which would affect their lives. He was in charge of distributing land and as most people worked on the land it was important that the relationship was good as a means to survival. Towards the end of source eight it states that
Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their Lands centers on the landmark 1823 Supreme Court case Johnson vs. M'Intosh. Robertson's research provides previously undiscovered knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the case, placing the case in a new context both politically and judicially. Robertson tells the story of a costly mistake, one made by the American judicial system but paid for by an indigenous people who to this day suffer from the effects of American settlement. As reviewer Christopher Tomlin writes, "Robertson's narrative is far less concerned with parsing its legal doctrine, than with the historical circumstances of the case itself." Robertson begins his
The films “The other conquest”, “Jerico”, and “I the Worst of All” are all a depiction of what life would be like during the Spanish Conquest. These films give different point of views during the Spanish Conquest. The films give a person a well-rounded view of how the world really changed for different people during a historical movement. After watching these films, one is able to assess and determine their own truth about what exactly happened to Amerindians and Spaniards during this time.
The narrative embroidery that tells of the Norman invasion of England refers to scenes and individuals but gives little more information than the images. Many wonder if the inscriptions were an afterthought- a theory that could well be supported by the awkward placement, careless squeezing and inconsistent abbreviations. Where space was needed, as in the height of the Battle of Hastings, the inscriptions were disposed of altogether. The soldiers, animals and weapons take up most of the space and actually break the register at times. Undoubtedly, the inscriptions would have been a source of surprising flattery for anyone who could identify himself on the tapestry, praising the elite pictured.
To begin to understand this extract from the Handbook to the Maude Roll, we first must answer some basic questions. This extract appears part of the original text of the roll and not a later addition. Second, we must understand the context of the time. The Canterbury Roll appears to be written between 1429 and 1433. A major revolt, the Glyndŵr rising, had taken place in Wales, led by Owain Glyndŵr, not a decade previously between 1400 and 1415.
Lane, Kris E. Pillaging the Empire: Piracy in the Americas 1500-1750 (M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1998). Kris E. Lane’s Pillaging the Empire: Piracy in the Americas 1500- 1750 focuses on Spain and Portugal’s encounters with pirates in the Americas during the early modern era. Lane diverges from traditional history on piracy through his attempt to place pirates in a world-historical perspective and he emphasizes how pirates were motivated by their desire for money rather than patriotic motives. Lane is a professor of Colonial Latin American History at Tulane University. The purpose of Pillaging the Empire is to provide a chronological survey of piracy in the Americas and introduce maritime predation in Spain’s colonial holdings between 1500 and1750.
The epic poem “Beowulf”, translated by Burton Raffel, focuses on a hero by the name of Beowulf who goes on a quest to rescue King Hrothgar and his people from an egregious monster by the name of Grendel. This Anglo-Saxon tale gives insight into the values and beliefs of the people from whom the story originated. Their war-centered ideology and views on loyalty and courage were the principles that the Anglo-Saxon culture was founded upon. While warfare was a focal point in their lifestyle, it was far from a savage, barbaric state of fighting. Honor and prestige were bestowed upon those who died during battle and selflessness for fellow warriors was a fundamental belief.
Unity is the main aspect of the Anglo-Saxon time period. Without unity Anglo-Saxons would have had a hard time surviving. Beowulf and “The Wanderer” give many
In Beowulf, an English epic poem that tells of the tell of the incredible warrior Beowulf, Anglo-Saxons values of the time period are displayed. Loyalty, bravery, and honesty are three of the most important values
The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and
Overall, these elements all aid in emphasizing the vast ‘superiority’ of the Normans. Firstly, when examining their respective feasts the Anglo-Saxons are depicted as immoral while the Normans are depicted as righteous. In the feast Harold and his men are pictured drinking, two of which with drinking horns. These drinking horns were “often shown in the hands of morally weak or evil characters and had become symbols of vanity and sin”.
The Middle Ages in British history were a very turbulent time, where tribes and clans turned into guilds and kingdoms. Along with the evolution of society came the evolution of language and literature. Tales strayed away from slaying beasts from far away and focused more on the life of common figures and the lessons to be learned from them. Knights were a particularly popular subject matter as were common figures that maintained a presence in society. However, the end goal in any Medieval literature was to tell a story that had a lesson to be learned; a moral.
These tales give modern historians and literary scholars concrete evidence to examine and understand Anglo Saxon life. In the day of Beowulf, storytelling functioned as principles to allow Anglo Saxon people to share and sculpt their future generations. Storytelling also played a large role in influencing civilians and leaders trust in others and each other. Stories could paint ideas and portraits of certain characteristics, even as either heroic or cowardly so as to manipulate civilians. In Beowulf, we learn the title character was widely respected.
Many factors lead to rise and domination of Europe. From motivation to discover new land, to new thinking and ideas, Europe has ended up on the top due to economic, political, and social factors. Starting in the fourteenth century, Europe ended the practice of feudalism and replaced it with monarchies. Some of the monarchs funded exploration trips, resulting in the discovery and exploration of new land. Exploration greatly benefited Europe by allowing them access to spices, cotton, silk, gold, diamonds, coffee, and most importantly sugar.
Far from presenting a clearer picture of the Conquest and its aftereffects, it can be argued that Anglo-Norman historians only complicated understandings of events by adding another layer of perspective to consider when searching for some kind of ‘objective truth’ on the matter. For example, Orderic Vitalis often contradicts both English and Norman sources within his Historia Ecclesiastica. Whereas the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle tells that king William I had all the monasteries in England plundered and “the money which rich Englishmen had deposited there taken away and paid into his treasury,” Orderic describes a much different kingly behavior. Highlighting the piety of William I, Orderic notes that whenever a bishop or abbot had died, William “sent competent officials to the bereaved house and had all the church property inventories to prevent its dilapidation by sacrilegious keepers.” These two interpretations blatantly contradict one another, which makes it difficult to determine which source has more merit in the truth.