North Carolina Civil Summons: A Case Study

MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months.

The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends his discharge was not handled fairly. The applicant states, in effect, it all started with one incident in which he had inappropriate relationship, disrespect a senior NCO, and he pursued Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) actions through the chain of command. The applicant contends he was trying to move forward, but the unit chose not to transfer him due to his rank reduction. The applicant states, in effect, he advised by counsel to take a Chapter 10, instead of going to trial by court-martial. The applicant contends he had one mistake in 10 years of service, he accepts the consequences,

You must provide the date of serving the notice of eviction in the Count I. Use this form to request an eviction order from the court.

It is with great pleasure that I recommend Carla Testani for a judicial appointment to the Third Circuit Court in Wayne County. As one of Carla’s partners at Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, PLC, I have had the opportunity to work closely with her and I know that she would make an outstanding judge. I can attest to the fact that Carla is highly intelligent, ethical and an experienced civil litigator. While these characteristics are certainly prerequisites to becoming a judge, I would like to take the opportunity to share with you some of Carla’s other great qualities that you will not find in her resume and I believe truly separate her from the other candidates for this position.

The Williams v. North Carolina case is a Supreme Court case in which the court decided that the federal government determines divorce and marriage statuses between state lines. It casted doubt over the validity of thousands of interstate divorces. Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix, who were both married, moved to Nevada for six weeks to become citizens of the state, and filed for divorce from their spouses. Their spouses, Carrie Wyke and Thomas Hendrix, were unaware that the divorces were being filed. Once the divorces were final, Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix married and then moved back to North Carolina. They lived there together until they were charged by the state of North Carolina for bigamous cohabitation.

On October 14, 2015, I went to the Arizona Superior Court at Downtown Phoenix. I went to the room 503 in the Central Court Building, which is a family court. The judge that was in the room is Paul J McMurdie. He begin hearing at 1:30 P.M. and there are a 5 hearing during the day that I visited. One of the case that he hearing is FC2010-006759, Hall vs. Gollins. It is a case about child support, which one side of the parent owe the money and did not pay for the child support. But, by the time that he call out for hearing, Sandra Alicia Michelle Gollins did not present. So the judge issue an child support arrest warrant to her. The hearing end around 2:17 P.M. and me and my friend have a chance to talk with judge McMurdie. We ask him to explain about the case and the process

MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man on Wednesday was given a chance to avoid prison when he was sentenced to complete a treatment program for admittedly being in possession of methamphetamine.

As you know I have been trying to meet with you to discuss your case with you since January of this year. Specifically, you had appointments scheduled for January 20, 2017, January 24, 2017, February 9, 2017, February 24, 2017 and, March 21, 2017. You failed to keep any of these appointments. The reason I wanted to meet with you was to explain why I was not interested in pursuing this case. I wanted to give you the respect of a face to face explanation of the issues I found in your medical records, which I believe will make it impossible to recover substantial compensation in this matter.

In your grievance filed at Manzanita Unit, you claim you are being denied access to a computer to review your legal CD’s. Your resolution is to have access to a computer.

WHEREFORE, Mr. Williams and Mr. Davis request that this Honorable Court grant the motion and continue to the trial date to a date in the latter part of February 2018, or in the alternative, a hearing on the

Texas Child Custody Form or Order in Suit to Modify The Parent-Child Relationship is a document intended to request the honorable judge to amend various permissions, support, and visitation pertaining to child/ren. This document has 12 sections and filling the factual information in every section is necessary. Read this document clearly and define the roles of petitioner and respondent/s using the provisions offered in the form. Texas Family Code, Chapter 156 governs the Partnership for Legal Access – Modification Order form. The form requires furnishing information in the text as well as a selection of options by marking the appropriate boxes. Use black or blue ink to fill the form.

He also suggests that the case should go back to the lower courts because the issue was not properly addressed.

Per the summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff claims that defendant PO Argelis Rodriguez and other MOS stopped him and accused him of throwing away a handgun. Plaintiff states that he did not possess a handgun. Plaintiff claims that PO Rodriguez assaulted him in the head, body, face and buttock. Plaintiff alleges that he was placed in handcuffs then his pants and underpants were removed and he was searched on the ground in public

It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute. Among the most popular reforms were, Pre-Action Protocols, Part36, Judicial Case management and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The overriding objective of the reforms as introduced by Lord Woolf was enabling courts to deal with the cases justly and proportionately.

An inmate’s most important right is to have access to the courts and without that right they “have neither a forum in which to question the conditions and constitutionality of their confinement, nor an arena in which to seek vindication of other alleged rights violations” (Hinckley, 1987, p. 19). So, the foundation of other prisoners’ rights are based this right of access (Hinckley, 1987). Bounds v Smith is a very good example of where inmate fought to ensure this assess.