Notoriety in the Charles Manson Trials In many cases and trials of the world, notoriety, or being famous from a bad quality or deed, affects many outcomes and verdicts. As more media and newsmen become familiar with famous cases, their articles are what capture the public’s attention, and what the public’s opinions of the trial are based on. This popularity of a trial can even help determine the future of the person that is accused of the crime. The Charles Manson trial was one of the most popular and well-known murder cases in the world and with the help of media and huge news stories, the trial hit the country by storm, each report affecting the public’s thoughts and views on the case. Charles Manson was maniacal from his early years. Charles …show more content…
“Manson had targeted a house, not knowing that Sharon Tate was living there since she was renting a house that had belonged to the producer that he tried to get a record deal with. However, he turned Manson down so he was up at the top of the list of people he wanted to kill. When he committed this murder, he did not actually get his hands dirty” (Actress Sharon Tate Found Murdered). Charles would send his followers to do the killing for him, since he was the leader. The next morning, the maid found the living room covered in blood, as Charles tried to make the scene look frightening. He wanted these murders to give the impressions that black people were the perpetrators and frighten the nation. “However, the first suspect of this murder was the caretaker at the residence, but he had passed a lie detector test and was no longer considered a suspect. People started mentioning Charles Manson’s name when there was talk of him in a Los Angeles jail” (Charles Manson). Charles and his four main followers that consisted of Tex Watson, Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel, and Linda Kasabian, were all eventually accused and put on …show more content…
As police investigators showed up, they were not even the first ones there, reporters had beat them to it, trying to get as much information as they could. This trial even ended up being the longest one to that date, starting on July 24 and ending almost 10 months later. “As time went on, and the trial began, the amount of reporters and newsmen grew larger and larger. Even during the jury selection, news reporters were all lined up outside, and even filling the hallways, just so they could hear the trial. They knew that if they got the best information and could put together this story, it would be a great read, since this case was very popular and the whole country soon seemed to find out about it. Offices in the court received hundreds and hundreds of calls a day, since each reporter was so desperate for clues and information” (Crimes and Trials of the Century [2 Volumes]). Two huge newspapers that covered the trial were the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, proving that interest in the murder went from one end of the country to the other. Even President Nixon commented about this horror, which shows that it shook the whole country. Each article and story had their own way of describing what had happened. Newsweek magazine even claimed the Charles was involved with voodoo or magic since it looked like he wore a bloody towel as a
It is more shocking to downplay the things she witnessed as well as actual facts about the Family than to make them seem outrageously out of the ordinary. If Monroe had opted to use hyperbole instead of litotes, the piece would have felt too much like other stories about Manson and followers of his exploits and the exploits of his family, and thus, be less compelling. The first example of Monroe’s use of litotes occurs right in the opening line of the article: “On the second day I spent with the Manson Bloggers, we found a tongue hanging from a tree.” This dismissal of what anyone would find to be a horrifying discovery is jarring, but it also alludes to the style of frankness and morbidity Monroe uses throughout the entire piece. Litotes occur frequently throughout the piece, and the following are just a few examples of
The Adventures of Howard Unruh The FBI defines mass murders as murdering four or more persons with no “cooling-off period” usually, a mass murder happens in one location where one or more people killing many others. In the end of the mass murder either the murderer(s) either kill themselves or a police officer kills them. In the U.S alone there were 372 mass murders killing killing 475 and wounding 1,870. Today i am going to write about one of the most interesting mass murders in history.
The media was everywhere within this trial. It had captured the attention of everyone in the state of Ohio and the country. They held a “pre-trial” to the first trial where it was just the town criticizing and accusing Dr. Sheppard. This was unconventional and unprofessional on many levels; something like this should have never been allowed to happen. During the first trial there were more people of the media than there were of court officials and people who were a critical part of the trial.
“Charles Manson: The Psycho of the Sixties” On August 9, 1969, pregnant actress Sharon Tate, Steven Parent, Abigail Folger, Voytek Frykowski, and Jay Sebring were murdered. The following night, August 10, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca were also murdered. These murders were committed by Mary Brunner, Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, Susan “Sadie” Atkins, Sandra Good, Charles “Tex” Watson, Patricia “Katie” Krenwinkel, and Leslie Van Houten. These people were all part of the Charles Manson “family.”
1994 The OJ Simpson trial of murder “I did not have anything to do with these crimes. Ever.” once said OJ Simpson (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/o/o_j_simpson.html). Everyone knew that Simpson did murder Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
Charles Manson is one of the most notorious cult leaders whose “family” carried out several murders in America in the late 1960’s. Even though he didn’t engage in any of the crimes, he still was considered America 's most popular serial killer. Manson gathered a group of followers who shared the same beliefs as him and four out of a hundred of them were involved in the infamous killing of Sharon Tate, Leno, and Rosemary
A horrible tragedy of three ruined lives, a brutally murdered 14 year old, and life imprisonments of two teenage killers (Linder, 1). Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, two extremely intelligent young men with a crazed affection for each other, shocked many people by the gruesomeness and the nature of the murder of Bobby Franks. In Chicago, 1924, the radio was just making an entrance into social life, cultural norms were changing as the economy boomed, and traditional views on life began to change to be more contemporary (History.com Staff). Leopold and Loeb were fearless, living the fast life of robbing and conning, when they decided to commit the perfect, unsolvable, murder. They had no want or even reason to kill, but to experience the thrill of adrenaline flow through them (Linder, 2).
Groups of hippies would gather into remote communities in the countryside, striving for a life of simplicity and an escape from the pressures of suburban life. However, in many instances these communities developed into dangerous cults, as many individuals were vulnerable to manipulation due to their isolation from the rest of the world and the drug use that went on within various groups. The infamous “Manson Family” is the best known example of the dangers of cults and the devastation they cause. Led by Charles Milles Manson, which began forming during 1967's Summer of Love and was responsible for the brutal murders of Sharon Tate, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca and four others. The murders were horrific, as their victims were stabbed multiple times even after they had died, and in the case of Sharon Tate, who as pregnant at the time, her baby was cut out of stomach while she was being murdered.
Black Dahlia Murder In 1947 the tragic loss of Elizabeth Short shocked many people all over the world. This wasn’t your typical murder, this murder had to have been planned out and thought about for a while before its happening. The “Black Dahlia Murder” is the biggest unsolved case in Los Angeles and is still an undergoing investigation. I have reason to believe that Dr. Gorge Hodel is the murderer behind the brutality of Elizabeth Short’s body.
After a twelve-hour interrogation, Brenton Butler confessed to the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. A key claim made by the defense attorneys in this case was that this was a false confession, and after reaching a verdict of not guilty, the jury clearly agreed. The factors that led the false confession were laid out in a scene during the documentary. Instead of using the interview to discover the truth, the interrogators specifically sought out a confession from the suspect. They began the interrogation with the presumption that Brenton Butler was guilty.
The first layer the Wedding Cake Model of Criminal Justice are celebrated cases. These cases are directly in the sites of media outlets. This because of the celebrity involved with the case. These type of cases command a great deal of media attention. When the court systems are dealing with these types of cases, they have to go about them a certain way.
The Murder of the Hollywood Starlet A young hollywood starlet was brutally murdered in 1947 with no killer identified to this day. This is real case that still puzzles investigators today. The woman in question was named Elizabeth Short, but is more widely known as the “Black Dahlia.” She was given this nickname by the press because of the sheer, black clothing she tended to wear (“The Black Dahlia Murder - Read All about it in FBI Records.”).
Additionally, the media got into the investigation by asking questions about the events before the murder. The National Enquirer, for instance, took a different angle to investigate the case; however, by doing this, the media almost made it impossible for proper investigations to be held by the criminal justice system. Ogletree Jr. maintains that the press failed terribly by trying to assume what the lawyers or witnesses thought at different times of the trial, which was a fail (Ogletree). Consequently, there should be a level of protection from the media. Public figures should not have their cases aired or followed to prevent tampering of evidence or misconceptions.
During the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Illinois, eight people were arrested and tried for conspiring to incite a riot. The two organizations that the defendants were involved with were MOBE (National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam) and Yippies (Youth International Movement). Prior to their arrest, both organizations had joined in a lawsuit against the City of Chicago for their lack of cooperation in processing a permit. During the trial, the defendants and their attorneys made it a point to make the procedural process as theatrical as possible for the media. This was a ploy to utilize the media as a tool in order to portray the flaws within the government to the public.
Although Charles Cullen was the serial killer, the hospitals where Cullen worked were also at fault. In 60 minutes, the interviewer stated that Charles Cullen was a suspect long before his arrest. “Charles Cullen was the main suspect for poisoning random bags of saline…if you talk to the investigators there they’ll tell you Cullen was our man, we knew he was dirty. They couldn’t prove anything. It’s all circumstantial” (60 minutes, 4:30).