1. The idea behind Hedonism is that the primary human value is to achieve pleasure and avoid pain at all costs. People who follow this ideological way of life define pain and pleasure as the only two things with intrinsic value, meaning that they can identify what’s is “good” or “bad”, if they produce pain or pleasure, making pleasure the ultimate good, and pain “bad”. Continuously pleasure or happiness can be achieved by indulging on physical indulgences, like drinking, eating and sex, now all of this can only give you physical pleasure and usually doesn’t last for a long time, and to achieve more of it, you keep chasing after it until it doesn’t have same effect or pleasure like it once did.
Aristippus and Epicurus who were different philosophers
…show more content…
It only revolves around pleasure and the absence of pain.
2. Nozick’s thought out experiment starts by asking the question: what defines a good life? (Nozick) An answer could be the ideology of Hedonism, to produce pleasure and avoid pain. Continuously Robert asks as to imagine a machine that can realistic imitate a desirable feeling forever, would you plug yourself in the machine? If our human value is to achieve pleasure then we should plug in but Robert Nozick’s disagrees contradicting Hedonism, that experiencing pleasure is not as important than feeling some other components of life.
Robert believed that nobody will want to plug themselves in such machine, as happiness from physical pleasures is short and meaningless, and by being in constant happiness we can reach to a frustrating non-ending cycle of emptiness as it won’t provide us with the same intensity of pleasure like doing something for the first time, example like reading your favorite for the first time, or the feeling of the adrenaline rush when riding a roller coaster. We will try to seek pleasure in a higher level, but failing to do
…show more content…
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that focuses in the result or consequences of a certain action, disregarding the intentions overall. Making good consequences is equal to good actions (morally correct). Furthermore, utilitarianism comes with the idea of doing good for a greater number, so it’s not an egocentric ideology but one that is more thoughtful to others, like sacrificing a night out to help your family members, or deciding to go for Italian food even though you don’t like it but the rest of your family does. We choose the action that will produce the most happiness, for a greater number of people (principle of
“ Non-philosophers tend to think of a hedonist as a person who seeks out pleasure for themselves without any particular regard for their own future well-being or for the well-being of others”. Barbara is not concerned about her well-being, and she most certainly isn’t concerned about the well-being of anyone else(besides
In the article, “You Are Already Living Inside a Computer” Ian Bogost informs his audience of how technology is advancing at a very rapid rate and is affecting our day to day lives. Bogost is fearful because he suspects people are becoming so addicted to technology that they want to form into it. He quotes “newer dreams of what’s to come predict that humans and machines might meld, either through biohacking or simulated consciousness.” (Bogost 5). When new technology comes out people become excited and want the newest version right away.
However, their intentions ultimately lead to temporary happiness, long term problems mainly due to the fact that they expel the thought of intrinsic
The pursuit of happiness is defined as “the fundamental right mentioned in the Declaration of Independence to freely pursue joy and live life in a way that makes you happy.” The ability to find happiness is a right guaranteed to all citizens in the United States, yet many countries do not possess the same rights as America and instead are plagued by corruption. Procuring contentment is a difficult journey for all people, but those who do not have access to knowledge will find it to be a much more daunting task. In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Montag’s struggle to find joy under an oppressive regime required him to challenge his knowledge in a way he never truly had before. Happiness is analyzed constantly in the real world as well, and the philosophers and scientists who study it consistently link it to knowledge, as shown in the articles by Main, Socrates and in the article about Individualism.
Epictetus did not have any rivals. He was well liked and was influenced by many philosophers. Stoicism’s closest rival was Epicureanism. Epicureanism was founded by Epicurus and taught people how to not fear death and the supernatural, as well as finding happiness at any given time. Its main belief is that pleasure is the end of life.
Bentham says that pleasures and pains have seven different ways of being measured. A legislator has to view all the pleasures and pains and their values before making a decision. Pleasure is valued through how long it lasts and the intensity of it. It is important to assess the problem through taking in account of who is being affected and what pleasure and pain it will cost. Another important point that Bentham makes is to see what kind of pleasure or pain will be caused from a decision.
Pain, discomfort, suffering, depression, does not exist. Citizens of this world are conditioned from a young age to seek pleasure above all: to be satisfied with where they are, to be addicted to a drug that takes away all negative emotions, to be “happy. ”When young they are conditioned to like certain things, like outdoor sports, but have a disdain for other things, such as flowers. In this situation, people would enjoy the recreational use of the outdoors, but dislike it enough that they want to come back to the city. Essentially, they are conditioned to ultimately “consume manufactured articles as well as transportation”(Huxley 23).
During chapter two in the fundamentals of ethics book, the paradox of hedonism is explained. The paradox of hedonism is described as “those who try really hard to make themselves happier almost never succeed” (Shafer-Landau, 33). Many people believe that if they try extremely hard to be happy then sooner or later they will become happy, but is this really true? Hedonists believe “that even if many people don’t in fact strive for happiness, they should do so, and would do so if they knew what was good for them” (Shafer-Landau, 32). This quote is saying that happiness is an intrinsic good; but as we learned on pages 33 and 34 it is not.
This demeanor requires constant vigilance, for it is a perpetual search to find other colleagues. Once someone does find enjoyable companionship; they must preserve this attentiveness to support their relationships. Seeking gratification and meaning through others can be beneficial in the present connected world, and the networks gained can lead to future prosperity; however, these relationships may spawn bouts of confusion, anger, or sadness. Unlike social happiness, solitary happiness is entirely based on the current state of oneself. Gratification and meaning is garnered through various forms of learning and introspection.
“What else can matter to us, other than how our lives feel from the inside?" (Nozick) This question was asked by Robert Nozick in response to an Experience Machine that would give a person any experience that they desired. Once plugged into this Experience Machine you cannot turn back to reality, you would not be able to know if you were in a type of a never ending vivid dream. This scenario has led to the debate over what the correct choice would be if you had the choice to plug into the machine.
The morality of an action is determined by the outcome of that action. At an initial glance, Utilitarianism seems as if it would be a superior way to live a life full of good will, as it is focused on doing the most
Things that are mentally stimulating and take a bit to learn and attain. It is said that higher levels are more resistant to tolerance. Meaning that you bore from it way less easier than a lower level pleasure. Consequently, the way we achieve such happiness seems to fizzle when put into action with rule and act utilitarianism. Louis P. Pojman clarifies the difference between the two.
Throughout the history, there have been heated discussions on what constitutes a good life. Philosophers have given different annotations on the meaning of good life based on their beliefs, perspectives or even scientific-based evidences. Some view a good life as an accumulation of material goods that brings “large amount” of pleasure to oneself. On the other hand, Mencius and Aristotle advocate good life as possessing of pleasure that incorporates ethical values and they believe that by doing so one will experience enduring happiness. There is no ultimate right or wrong for these interpretations since this is not a factual question.
Furthermore, Nozick’s experiment highlights that even though the machine may provide us with momentary bliss, intuitively we feel that something is missing from the designed machine. We value the provided pleasure, but at some point, plateauing pleasure and happiness leaves us wanting beyond our selections. The experiment reveals that there’s something additional to pleasure that we value. Even if one designs such a machine we consequentially, would lose our yearning to “live” our true lives in actuality. Therefore, Nozick’s experiment illustrates that the argument for Ethical Hedonism is weak and that something beyond pleasure matters to
In this study, 17 patients each had a 120-degree heat simulator placed on their legs. Patients all gave varying numerical (0-10) values to their pain, even though the actual source of pain was identical (Science Daily, 2013). This study shows that everyone experiences pain differently, and, therefore, experiences happiness and pleasure differently. Hedonistic utilitarianism also requires, in certain circumstances, that we choose to make decisions that make us happier in the long run. This can be a very complicated task, and makes deciding which actions to take in everyday life, much harder.