In lab 3.1 we took a look at attentions and how different task require different amounts of attention for certain tasks. When a secondary task is added the participant has not done before or is difficult, it task away attention or “ space” for the primary task. For this lab we wanted to see how our walking would change when our attentional demands changed with the addition different task to perfumer using a tennis ball. In condition one the participant was asked to walk across the room (there and back) for a total of five trials. The examiner recorded how long it took to walk each time. During this condition the participant was not allowed to know their time between trails. After completing all five trails the times were added up and averaged. …show more content…
What I mean by that is, as excepted with an increase in secondary task in condition four my average was the highest meaning it took me the longest because my attentional demands had changed. A result I was not excepting was getting the same average for condition one and three. As stated earlier my trails in condition three were all over the place. It would be interesting to redo condition three and see if my times would still be all over the place or would be different. Also, comparing condition three results with the other students in my class and see if they had a similar experience. If no, t my results could possibly be an out lier if we were to graph and look at the class data as a whole. One factor that could effect results would be the environment. Meaning the other people (students) around you during your trials. If one student was walking extremely fast in comparison to your normal pace you might start to walk faster subconsciously and be influenced by them. Another factor that could influence the results is not throwing the ball properly in condition four and just passing it to the other hand instead. If we were to compare the group data and some students pass the ball instead of throwing it their times would be different then if they threw the ball. This would make it hard to compare condition four results because not every did not execute it the same
Data Analysis The scientific question that was asked in this experiment was,”What is the best angle to shoot a paintball to achieve the farthest distance possible?” The hypothesis of the experiment was,” If a paintball is shot at a 50 degree angle, than the paintball will travel the farther than any other angle tested.” The independent variable is the angle of degrees the paintball is shot from and the dependent variable is the distance the paintball travels at the different angles it is shot from. The control variables are the brand of paintball gun, the model of the paintball gun, the type of paintballs being shot from the paintball gun, and the tools used to measure the distance the paintball goes.
Darvishi, Kordi, Rafiee, and Shirvan (2014) explained that the range of motion (ROM) has a critical role in the performance of movements and that they wanted to investigate the role of related exercise on decreasing the ROM. To evaluate the impact, the performance of overhead throwing was compared between weight training participants (WT) and non-weight training participants (NW). They found out the ROM of internal and external rotation of the shoulder was lower in WT than in NW subjects (P<0.05), and angular displacement of the shoulder and elbow also demonstrated significant differences (P=0.049 & P=0.045) between the two groups of subjects. Another finding was that movement pattern would be negatively influenced in the kinetical
Multiple adaptation can be made to the task as well to help or challenge facilitation, such as the size and weight of the dart or ball, the distance and size of the target, the position being thrown from
These kids were set to practice a certain number of hours to test the different outcomes depending on how many hours or put in(Gladwell, 12). It is shown in the data that the kid to practice more became more successful with their insurance playing skills. The next piece of evidence that this source used was
The time of observation started at approximately 6:40 when the game was scheduled to start. There were seven individuals within the common room. Three individuals were sitting on the L shaped couch, and four individuals were sitting on the floor in front of the television.
Our 2nd and 3rd trials which had 1 and 2 paperclips caused our time to decrease to 1.6 and 1.8 seconds. Our last trial with the most mass of 3 paper clips lasted the shortest amount of time, only 1.43 seconds. Our responding variable was the time flown and the controlled variable was who threw the airplane
Running speed is found to have the strongest relationship with the digit ratio, compared to other physical tests, such as strength (Manning and Hill 210). Similarly, Ranson, Stratton, and Taylor discovered that boys with smaller digit ratios scored higher on sprints and shuttle runs, but there was no pattern identified with the digit ratio and the standing broad jump (330). This relates to Hill and his colleagues findings that a smaller 2D:4D ratio corresponds to a greater maximum oxygen intake therefore causing the individual to have greater success in sports that require aerobic endurance, as opposed to sports requiring strength (Hill et al.
In the paper’s study, both groups would have two practice sessions, spaced a week apart, with the test following another week-long interval. Mielicki’s study only had one practice
Three objects were placed inside the OF in the correct locations (as shown on the outside of the OF). Subjects were placed in a transport box and moved from the colony room into the running room. Subjects were placed in the corner of the open field nearest to the door (facing the corner). Immediately after the stopwatch was started. Number of ambulations, contacts (number of times the subject’s snout crosses into the same square as the object) and time spent in contact with the objects were then recorded.
It can be ascertained and concluded whether the effect is positive (better test scores) or negative (stammering through
Therefore, visualising my performance and clearing my mind allows me to purely focus on the task and increase my concentration
Performance outcome of this test can be affected by things such as verbal encouragement, length of walk-way and number of practice
and its coefficient also increases in magnitude. Therefore one extra hour that a child spends on playing the percentile rank on average increases by 2.30. The time use variable for study is not significant however at a p-value of 0.101
Since I had already done background research for drafts of my Criterion A section, I had to set a hypothesis based on the knowledge from the research. The overall hypothesis was that ‘There will be a difference between learning modalities of left-handed and right-handed people because they have different sides developed in the brain.’ Then, I had planned for the experiment specifically, revising it many times with my supervisor, school science teachers, and research. Especially, I went to the science teacher, and got a lot of advices such as setting the specific number of keywords for the criteria of the tests, and time for the each tests. Also, to make sure that there are no features that are advantageous to certain people, I had to choose the test resources that the participants here are not likely to be familiar with.
Within these five minutes of on-task behavior Mrs. Beal checked in with Eric and engaged with him as he started plotting the coordinates. During the following 15 intervals Eric did not demonstrate on-task behavior for the duration of the interval. If Eric was off-task for even one second of the interval he was marked off-task for the entire interval.