These small errors may be arised as a result of temperature. Because the accurate mesuring process took much time and during this time the temperature of water was decreasing. Among two methods the density bottle gives more accurate measurement of the volume, resulting in more accurate determination of density. One of disadvantages of hydrometer is that hydrometer has Operator dependent readings, therefore has limited accuracy. Morever, for measuring the density using hydrometer large sample volume is required.
Also, not all wood is the same, and not the same piece of wood was put at the bottom every time, creating different amounts of friction every time, which is something that was not intended. If there was no friction, the graphed data would be a straight horizontal line because no outside forces aside from the cart would be acting on the blocks. A smaller source of imprecision could also be measuring the distance that the blocks travelled. When the blocks were pushed, the were occasionally tilted a little sideways, which left the corner of the block being the part I measured for the distance pushed, which could also created imprecisions in the data. How these imprecisions affected my data is by that it allowed the data points to be too high or too low from the best fit line depending on the friction that the block of wood was experiencing or how precisely the distance pushed was
It was also found that unstructured studies and models were far less accurate in the prediction of recidivism versus studies or models which used empirical data. I have chosen to include this in my article to highlight the fact that there are scientific studies being conducted on recidivism rates. The source utilized will highlight the categories used to determine if an offender will make a repeat offense, and what can be done to reduce these factors. I will also show that unstructured models are not as efficient as empirical data when forecasting whether an individual will repeat offend or
At first this may sound shocking, we of course know as readers the clock is broken, but maybe we’re unclear on just why this interferes with the acquisition of knowledge? What’s gone wrong isn’t a matter of if the belief is true or false, but rather, one should not arrive at a true belief via a false belief. That is, false beliefs are inadequate evidence for arriving at truth. To further explain Gettier’s critiques,
Some factors that could have affected the experiments end result could have been through measuring the all the reactants and equipment their might have been an error somewhere there. Another factor that could have been is that the vinegar was a lower concentrated acetic acid and could have other components in it as well which could have ruined the end measurement of the final product by getting a heavier measurement that actually
This means that the evidence was not reviewed enough to justify internment camps. This also means that the United States accidently or purposefully excluded information so they did not have to provide an explanation for why they did it. It also means that because the government did not release the documents that were detained individual people could not review it and say it was unjustified. ”An extensive effort was made to locate and review records of government action and to analyze other sources of information” (Personal Justice Denied...5). If the government did not make an extensive effort to search for evidence to justify internment camps, then why did they build them?
Different jargon may be used, or it could have been written in a different time period which would make it harder. A change in a single word can really make a story one hundred percent different. (The Things They Carried,Pg 79) In the first reading, The Things They Carried, (Tim O’brien) if it were changed the story would be very different. One word or incorrect punctuation can change everything. For example, if the reading were called, “The Things They Left Behind”, it would have a sad twist
The results also probably show that the smaller batteries had to use more force than the big batteries. An extraneous variable could have been that the tape making the poles and needle stay together got loose. Another extraneous variable is that the tape might not have been securely holding the needle and the top and bottom of the battery. The location of where the experiment was done could have made the results change. One of the observations was the C-Battery didn 't want to go at first but then started going fast.
These things do not have a purpose, and can even be damaging to the individual. Finally, I believe that the aspects Paley observed between the universe and the watch can be explained by natural selection and evolution. Of course, Paley would not have known about this at the time of writing his paper, which is why he doesn’t take it into