612 Words3 Pages

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
5.1 Unit Root Test Results
Unit root test was the first test done on each of the independent variables in both models to check for stationarity. As putting the result of each test here would make it congested, the T-static and probability values from the results are selected from each result and compiled in the tables hereunder. The unit root test results for each variable are attached in the appendix.
Table 5. 1 Result of unit Root Test for Recurrent-Capital Expenditure and GDP
Variable Level 1st Difference Stationary at T-Static Prob. Decision T-Static Prob. Decision log(GDP) -0.867 0.945 Not Stationary -4.137 0.017 Stationary 1st Difference log(CE) -0.428 0.982 Not Stationary -4.787 0.003 Stationary 1st Difference*…show more content…*

of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.** None * 0.650 32.562 27.584 0.011 At most 1 0.297 10.908 21.132 0.657 At most 2 0.171 5.824 14.265 0.636 At most 3 0.094 3.064 3.841 0.080 Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values Both Trace test and Max-eigenvalue test results shown above indicate that there exists 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level. The test performed for variables for Model II (including the sectoral expenditure) assumed the some of the series to have trend while some are stochastic in the series with ‘Intercept and trend in CE – no trend in VAR’ trend specification selected, and one lag used in differences (two lags in

of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.** None * 0.650 32.562 27.584 0.011 At most 1 0.297 10.908 21.132 0.657 At most 2 0.171 5.824 14.265 0.636 At most 3 0.094 3.064 3.841 0.080 Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values Both Trace test and Max-eigenvalue test results shown above indicate that there exists 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level. The test performed for variables for Model II (including the sectoral expenditure) assumed the some of the series to have trend while some are stochastic in the series with ‘Intercept and trend in CE – no trend in VAR’ trend specification selected, and one lag used in differences (two lags in

Related

## Nt1310 Unit 9 Study Guide

478 Words | 2 PagesFor energy signals a) The energy will be finite and power will be infinite b) The energy will be finite and power will be zero c) The energy will be zero and power will be infinite d) Both energy and power will be finite 4. The unit step signal u(n) is delayed by 3 units of time is denoted as, a) u(n+3) = 1 ; n≥3 = 0 ; n0 7. Which of the following system is causal a) h(n)=n(0.5)n u(n+1) b) y(n)=x2(n)-x(n+1) c) y(n)=x(-n)+x(2n-1)

## Nt1310 Unit 5 Study Guide Answers

437 Words | 2 Pages")); while(1); } Serial.println(F(" Deleting old connection profiles")); if (!cc3000.deleteProfiles()) { Serial.println(F("Failed! ")); while(1); } Serial.print(F(" Attempting to connect to ")); Serial.println(WLAN_SSID); if (!cc3000.connectToAP(WLAN_SSID, WLAN_PASS, WLAN_SECURITY)) { Serial.println(F("Failed! ")); while(1); } Serial.println(F("Connected! ")); Serial.println(F("Request DHCP")); while (!cc3000.checkDHCP()) { delay(100); // ToDo: Insert a DHCP timeout! } /* Display the IP address DNS, Gateway, etc.

## Nt1310 Unit 10 Lab Report

302 Words | 2 Pages%% Init % clear all; close all; Fs = 4e3; Time = 40; NumSamp = Time * Fs; load Hd; x1 = 3.5*ecg(2700). '; % gen synth ECG signal y1 = sgolayfilt(kron(ones(1,ceil(NumSamp/2700)+1),x1),0,21); % repeat for NumSamp length and smooth n = 1:Time*Fs '; del = round(2700*rand(1)); % pick a random offset mhb = y1(n + del) '; %construct the ecg signal from some offset t = 1/Fs:1/Fs:Time '; subplot(3,3,1); plot(t,mhb); axis([0 2 -4 4]); grid; xlabel( 'Time [sec] '); ylabel( 'Voltage [mV] '); title( 'Maternal Heartbeat Signal '); x2 = 0.25*ecg(1725); y2 = sgolayfilt(kron(ones(1,ceil(NumSamp/1725)+1),x2),0,17); del = round(1725*rand(1)); fhb = y2(n + del) '; subplot(3,3,2); plot(t,fhb, 'm '); axis([0 2 -0.5 0.5]); grid; xlabel( 'Time [sec] '); ylabel(

## Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1

117 Words | 1 PagesFor example; M = 4 bits, N = 16 bits If P(j) = 1 (Propagation); then Group(j) will be skipped X(j): m-bits of group (j) Y(j): m-bits of group (j) Cin(j): Carry in to group(j) Cout(j) = Cin(j+1): Carry out of group(j) = Carry in to next group(j+1) (j): Group(j) consisting of m-bits numbers to add Fig 5.14: Carry Skip Adder Block diagram Table 5.3: Carry out Cases Table Case Xi Yi Xi + Yi Ci+1 Comment Ci = 0 Ci = 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Kill (STOP) Carry In 2 0 1 1 0 Ci Propagate Carry In (P) 1 0 1 0 Ci 3 1 1 0 1 1 Generate (Carry Out)

## Nt1310 Unit 2 Case Analysis

140 Words | 1 Pages10 = Number of periods 2%= Interest rate per period 1. 21899= The corresponding value 1.21899 x 150,000 = 182,848.50= multiply The loan Future Value is: 182,848.50; Rounded: 182,849 Principal: 150,000 Rate: 4% divided by 2=2% Number of periods: 2x5= 10 150,000 (1 + .002) ^ 10 = 153027.145 or 153027.15 Rounded 153,027.15 – 150,000= 3,027.15 I=PRT= $200,000 x .006 x 28 = $33,600 236,468.44 - 200,000 =36,46 200,000divided by100 = 2,000; Intersecting cell of 28 and 6% is 0.461297; Multiply number in cell by 2,000 = 922.59= There is 922.59 Interest Earned. $200,000 + $33,600 = $233,600; 200,000+922.59 = 200,922.5925x 1 = 25 6% divided by 1 = 6%; corresponding cell= 0.23300 Multiplied by 500,000 = 116,500 PV= Future Value / 1 + Annual Interest

## Nt1310 Unit 2 Java Case Study

92 Words | 1 Pages#include #include void main(){ int n,i=0,k,digit; char * ptr[100]; printf("Enter any integer: "); scanf("%d",&n); while(n){ digit = n %10; n = n /10; switch(digit){ case 0: ptr[i++] = "zero"; break; case 1: ptr[i++] = "one"; break; case 2: ptr[i++] = "two"; break; case 3: ptr[i++] = "three"; break; case 4: ptr[i++] = "four"; break; case 5: ptr[i++] = "five"; break; case 6: ptr[i++] = "six"; break; case 7: ptr[i++] = "seven"; break; case 8: ptr[i++] = "eight"; break; case 9: ptr[i++] = "nine"; break; } } for(k=i-1;k>=0;k--){ printf("%s ",ptr[k]);

## 5.2 GABOR-KPCA Results Paper

135 Words | 1 Pages5.2 GABOR-KPCA Results: Using Mahalanobis Cosine (MAHCOS) Distance Identification experiments: The rank one recognition rate of the experiments equals (in %): 80.00% Verification/authentication experiments on the evaluation data: The equal error rate on the evaluation set equals (in %): 4.17% The minimal half total error rate on the evaluation set equals (in %): 2.68% The verification rate at 1% FAR on the evaluation set equals (in %): 95.00% The verification rate at 0.1% FAR on the evaluation set equals (in %): 92.50% The verification rate at 0.01% FAR on the evaluation set equals (in %): 0.83% Verification/authentication experiments on the test data (preset thresholds on evaluation data): The verification rate at 1% FAR on the test set

## Herbert Run Experiment

313 Words | 2 PagesLast, the Nitrate level for Commons was 0.08 ppm. For Herbert Run the conductivity level was 687µS/cm. The Turbidity level was 0 FAU and the Nitrate level was 0.02ppm. I accept my hypothesis and reject parts of my hypothesis. I reject that both streams have a high turbidity level.

## The Kepler Triangle

941 Words | 4 PagesTo convert the differences from the theoretical value, which is the approximated value of the golden ratio, one can take the theoretical value minus the experimental value and then divide that by the theoretical value. Using the number given, finally multiply by 100% to produce a percent. If the result is a negative for the percent, then the absolute value of the number has to be taken as shown below. PEPA= (1.61803 - (19,89 meters 12.28 meters)1.61803) x 100% = 0.0025% PAAE= (1.61803- (12.28 meters7.59 meters)1.61803) x 100% = 0.0068% These percentages indicate that the architects who had built the Parthenon had used the concept of the golden ratio is there structure. It also demonstrates that from the actual theoretical value of the golden ratio, there is only a slight difference between the theoretical and experimental value which was the reason for the very small percentage.

## Mental Toughness In Sports

3250 Words | 13 PagesGroup Statistics group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Reboundability amateur 30 3.8000 1.03057 .18815 experience 30 4.5667 1.00630 .18372 Table 8 F- and T-table for the testing of variances and equality of means of two unrelated groups of amateurs and experienced with regard to

## Nt1310 Unit 1 Exercise 1

655 Words | 3 PagesThe preceding figures shows the Fibonacci and Galois implementations of maximal length shift register m-sequences. As can be seen in these figures, m-sequences contain m shift registers. The shift register set is filled with an m-bit initial seed that can be any value except 0 (if the m bits in the m shift registers are all zero, then it is a degenerate case and the output of the generator is 0). The following examples demonstrate bit generation. 1.

## Nt1310 Unit 6 Lab 1

443 Words | 2 PagesFrom the design specifications, we know that Q = 0 if DG = 01 and Q = 1 if DG = 11 because D must be equal to Q when G = 1. We assign these conditions to states a and b. When G goes to 0, the output depends on the last value of D. Thus, if the transition of DG is from 01 to 10, the Q must remain 0 because D is 0 at the time of the transition from 1 to 0 in G. If the transition of DG is from 11 to 10 to 00, then Q must remain 1. First, we fill in one square belonging to the stable state in that row. Next a dash is entered in the squares, where both inputs change simultaneously.

### Nt1310 Unit 9 Study Guide

478 Words | 2 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 5 Study Guide Answers

437 Words | 2 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 10 Lab Report

302 Words | 2 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1

117 Words | 1 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 2 Case Analysis

140 Words | 1 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 2 Java Case Study

92 Words | 1 Pages### 5.2 GABOR-KPCA Results Paper

135 Words | 1 Pages### Herbert Run Experiment

313 Words | 2 Pages### The Kepler Triangle

941 Words | 4 Pages### Mental Toughness In Sports

3250 Words | 13 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 1 Exercise 1

655 Words | 3 Pages### Nt1310 Unit 6 Lab 1

443 Words | 2 Pages