Nuclear Fission Advantages And Disadvantages

1472 Words6 Pages
The problem is that the world is a very massive place, where we need a lot of energy to fulfil the basic needs of our lives. Through the years we have been presented with several different alternative energy source options, as the energy sources like fossil fuels works against the environment. Nuclear fission is one of the alternative energy sources which is considered to be the future energy source of the world, but just like any other things nuclear fission has several disadvantages and advantages, but it is our responsibility as a society to weigh those implications and come up with a solution which supports the world for the better. Nuclear fission is one of the things which still remains to have an uncertain future which is due to two…show more content…
They are able to meet the needs of large industrialized cities as well as the suburban towns, as the energy is quick to create, meaning that they are able to make large amounts of energy if it is required due to an emergency ("Nuclear Fission Advantages and Disadvantages"). Small amounts of U-235 can produce large amounts of energy while burning of fossil fuels produces much less energy with a much larger amount ("Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear"). Nuclear fission has been proved to be the most powerful and efficient source than any other alternative energy sources, due to the advancement in technologies, it has made it a more viable option than others. It is due to this, why many countries are putting huge investments in nuclear power ("Nuclear Energy"). It also makes the electricity cheap as the cost of uranium, is quite low and also the average life of a nuclear reactor ranges from 40-60years, so it is great investment it can last a really long time. The main reason behind the costs of the fuel being low is because a small amount of the fuel can create massive amounts of energy, it releases million times more energy as compared to traditional sources of energy ("Nuclear…show more content…
Even though the application of the energy source as a alternative is a affordable, establishing a plant for it would require a high initial cost and would also take up to 5-10 years, along with this, the safety measures that need to be utilized inside the plants would be very expensive ("Disadvantages of Nuclear"). To build the complex technologies that are needed and the extreme safety measures that must be built, would require a staggering amount of money, for it to be built and also for the factories to run effectively. If the safety measures aren’t taken strictly then just accidents like the two major nuclear catastrophes at Chernobyl and Fukushima will repeat itself ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). As nuclear reactors cannot explode like nuclear bombs, as that would require a mix of 90% highly reactive fuel vs about 4-5% of highly reactive furl for nuclear power, which can melt down if the safety measures are not properly carried out, with some highly disastrous consequences ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). The radiation from Chernobyl incident extended as far a Sweden and Italy resulting in thousands of cancer cases to arise in those areas. Another disastrous incident happened in Fukushima Daiichi, which leaked into the Pacific Ocean, where it dispersed widely. Radioactive tuna was detected off the US Pacific coast in 2014,
Open Document