The Numbered Treaties is a series of agreements signed between the Canadian government and various First Nations communities between 1871 and 1921. These treaties were significant in shaping the relationship between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian government, as they established rights and obligations for both parties. Treaties were intended to be mutually beneficial. Treaties allowed First Nations people the right to self government and the right to receive payments from the crown. In exchange for this, First Nations people agreed to share their land with the settlers. The treaties were not documents of surrender, but rather documents of mutual understanding and agreement. They were intended to ensure that both parties could live in peace …show more content…
For example, during the negotiation of Treaty 6, the Cree and other Indigenous nations were promised certain provisions such as schools, farming equipment, and annual payments. However, many of these promises were not fulfilled or were inadequate, leaving the Indigenous peoples in a much worse position than before the treaty was signed. This unequal distribution of benefits suggests that the Crown’s Commissioners had a stronger bargaining position during the negotiation …show more content…
First Nations people were promised annual payments, reserves, and the right to hunt and fish on the surrendered lands. In exchange, they surrendered their title to the land. However, the Crown did not fulfill its obligations under the Treaty. The First Nations received inadequate and inconsistent annual payments, and the reserves were often unsuitable for agriculture or hunting and fishing. The Treaty also did not protect the First Nations from the encroachment of settlers and the loss of their traditional way of life.
Treaty 6, signed in 1876, contains similar promises to First Nations people. They were promised reserves, annual payments, and the right to hunt and fish on the surrendered lands. However, the Treaty also included a clause that required the First Nations to send their children to residential schools. The schools were designed to assimilate the First Nations children into European-Canadian culture, leading to the loss of their language, culture, and identity. The First Nations signatories did not fully understand the implications of this clause, and it had a devastating impact on their
Treaty 6 was signed on August 23,1876 at Fort Carlton and less than a month later on September 9, 1876 in Fort Pitt. Some Chief’s had expressed concern regarding being able to sustain this new way of life. They did not want to potentially lose touch with their way of living and the resources their lands possessed. The First Nations people had requested that the government aide their people with agricultural assistance, as well as help during times of famine, and pestilence. The Canadian Government was also asked if they could assist them with modern medicines.
The Aboriginals had original taught the early settlers how to trap and hunt about the land but in the documents associated with the deed and the land transfer, it was written that “Any claims of Indians too compensation for lands required for purposes of settlement shall be disposed of by the Canadian Government and the company shall be relieved of all responsibility in respect of them.”. Instead of the company leaving land for those who had aided them in the beginning. The singled them out due to racism and did not include them in any of the agreements between the HBC and the Crown in which they would receive land for themselves. This could have also contributed to the prejudice against the Aboriginals in future years because during that time period land was equal to power so those without land were treated as the poor and had no say. The deed also affected those who were against poaching and hunting.
This treaty sought out more land which lay north of the previously negotiated treaty of 1862. During this time the settlers had already expanded and began living north of the boundary that was established. With this dilemma the settlers convinced the Indians that a survey was necessary to provide a definitive
The Indigenous groups involved in previous treaties found that the government of Canada and Ontario were not living up to their promises and that settlers were encroaching on non-negotiated land in their northern hunting territories. The government then assigned a commission in 1923 that was comprised of Sinclair, McFadden and Williams (Hall, 2011). The treaties were then negotiated as people had already settled on the territory of the eight communities of Indigenous people that were involved. The Williams treaties were comprised of two separate treaties each looking at different land masses, the one directly related to our geographical location being the second signed between the commission and the Mississauga communities, this land stretched from lake Simcoe to the shore of Lake Ontario. The Williams treaty also included the land that was originally within the gunshot treaty, but unfortunately did not include the Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation whose ancestors who were a part of the original treaty.
During the treaty they were trying to end the war, they had already tried to do some peace treaties but they all failed. So finally they agreed
X-Marks Native Signatures of Assent written by Scott Richards Lyons explores the history of the American Indians in the United States. Further, Lyons goes into depth about boarding schools, assimilation, treaties, broken promises, and tragic events that caused harm to millions of American Indians. In this paper, I will discuss how the White Europeans came to the United States and basically assimilated the tribes that were located here before the “discovery” of the Americas. Next, I will define the terms treaty and x-marks. Lastly, I will explain how unjust everything is, in particular when we talk about the rights, and properties that tribes had before the Europeans came to contact them.
They had forgotten about Lubicon Lake Cree (part of Treaty 8) as they did not get a reserve. The government realized that the Lubicon Lake Cree people were entitled to their reserve in 1930, however, they
McGillivaray was an Creek leader who was easy for Washington to communicate with for McGillivray spoke english. Washington’s idea of the Native Americans was that they needed to be regarded as independent nations, and with that idea, Washington thought of his first solution to the “Native American Problem”. “He envisioned multiple sanctuaries or “homelands” under tribal control and federal protection.” Chief McGillivray disagreed with this proposal which forced Washington to think of a new one. This time Washington came up with a treaty that read “The United States solemnly guarantee to the Creek Nation, all their lands within the limits of the United States to the westward and southward of the boundary described in the proceeding article.”
The Dakota were being squeezed into smaller areas. Moving from previously prime hunting and fishing grounds to increasing smaller non-productive reservations, harsh winters and low supplies created times that that left many native families hungry and frustrated. Throughout the 1800’s, treaties were negotiated with the Dakota and the U. S. Government and native lands were exchanged for money, farming supplies and debt payments. These treaties were not in favor of the native population. By the late 1850’s, treaty violations by the United States and late or unfair annuity payments by Indian Agents, those authorized to interact with natives on behalf of the U.S. Government, caused increasing hunger and hardship among the Dakota.
After McGillivray was open to trade negotiations, the Treaty of New York was created. The treaty promised the protection of Creek Indian land boundaries against land seeking settlers and also assured them annual payments in money and trade goods (226). Although a treaty was created, neither side could keep their promise. McGillivray had also signed an agreement with the Spanish before he died because “the Creeks’ interests were best served by maintaining creative tension between the American and Spanish authorities” (226). The agreement that the United States had made in the Treaty of New York could not be kept as well as it had proved to be unrealistic.
The Aboriginals thought of the treaties as a mean to trade, not to own things. Another major issue and challenge with the numbered treaties were the fact that that there were many verbal promises made to the First Nations that didn't actually happen. These promises are called outside promises and were promises that weren’t actually written on the treaties. Namely, in treaties 1 and 2 First Nations said that the government would aid them in farming
There was no answer to the Metis petitions which made the Metis pressure the government. The Cree of the Treaty 6 region 1885 was the result of their anger of breaking the treaty agreements, these treaties were supposed to be made in good thoughts. Louis Riel told the unhappy people living in the North-West to press their case on Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald’s Conservative Government. Then Louis Riel created a petition in 1884 where he made the Metis and non-Metis settlers sign it. On March 8, 1885 the Metis passed a bill called the Revolutionary Bill of Rights.
Even when treaties were used in place of violence, the Native Americans were treated with little respect by the settlers. One example of this can be found in the story of The First Treaty of Fort Laramie. The First Treaty of Fort Laramie claimed that if the Native American peoples remained in the reservations, the United States government would send them annual payments of $50,000 dollars. However, many of these payments would never be delivered. This failure of the U.S. Government would lead to increasing amounts of starvation among the
Yet, he found the notion of treaty rights between two groups within the same society or special status for any group at odds with his notion of common and equal citizenship” (Blake & Donaldson, 2021). Even though he understood what was happening to the Indigenous people in Canada, he turned a blind eye. “He found the notion of treaty rights between two groups within
By doing this, colonial Canadians assumed that aboriginal cultural and spiritual beliefs were invalid in relation to European beliefs (244). The problem with ridding the First Nations Peoples of their languages, as Williston points out is to “deprive them of the sense of place that has defined them for thousands of years” (245). The private schooling system was an attack on First Nations identities, and their identity is rooted in “a respect for nature and its processes” (245).