Nutrition In Public Schools

Should the Government Impose Restrictions on Cafeteria Foods? Is society aware of the government’s capability to impose restrictions on the foods that primary and secondary school students are eating? What foods do students most enjoy eating for lunch and are these foods allowed to be served in their school cafeterias? The government is finding ways to improve the cafeteria food so that it is healthier for the consumers. These improvements will result in healthier and more wholesome lunches and breakfasts across the country.

The nation is trying to lower the number of obese children but these steps are far too drastic in the wrong direction. With my proposal of bringing my mother, kids would no longer choose the option of starvation rather than consuming school lunch. Not only would the school be saving money, but also feed children healthy nutritious food that will reduce

According to a survey(good food/bad food) conducted by Nicholas Ward, at Vacaville High

Also, if school starts later you will be able to have a proper and healthy breakfast. It is important for students’ because with there growing bodies and developing brains they need regular refueling often, from food. When kids skip breakfast, they don’t get what they need to be at their best in school and at home. If you’re short on time you can just throw some fruit in a blender and make a delicious and nutritious smoothie.

Another example is, if you change the students school lunch, and make it healthier you should do that to the teachers as well. Students do not like new changes just as much as teachers don't. The school will have a big drop in money because the students will eventually stop buying the school lunches, because they do not like what they are eating and paying for. I also believe that we should be able to pick and choose what we like to eat or what we want to eat because we are paying for the meal. Its not fair to the students to pay for food that they personally do not want to eat or buy.

The budget is insufficient to provide healthy foods. The budget is adequate if the food schools want to provide kids are low in quality and unhealthy. If we dive further into this issue, it shows that schools selling low-quality food is interested more in profit than health. “Their mission is not public health, but profit, so they’ll continue to sell the health­ damaging food that’s most profitable.” The fix for this is simple let the government step in and say provide healthy foods if schools don 't they will be fined.

School lunches should be nutritional and the meals at home should also be nutritional and balanced. I would say the FDA is trying to create some balance with the snacks. They are making sure that the foods we eat are actually what is promoted. This problem is affecting everyone not just children. Everyone should contribute to making nutrition an important factor in life and we should work together to decrease the amount of

Schools and students have found loopholes in the USDA’s plan to regulate the nutritional value of school lunches. While schools have to follow the USDA guidelines for their official daily served lunch and breakfast options, alternate food options such as vending machines and ‘a la carte’ lines are causing trouble. These alternate lunch options are referred to as “competitive foods” (“Junk Food in Schools”). These competitive foods are the issue and need to be altered in school cafeterias across the nation. They offer a replacement to the regular school lunches, and some kids find themselves skipping out on the school provided lunch options altogether (“Junk Food in Schools”).

Thirty percent of students on earth have numerous health risks. Imagine if your school 's cafeteria plans to change to a new, healthier school lunch menu, witch would eliminate some of the students ' favorite cafeteria foods. I believe that schools should change there lunches into a healthier lunches because it limits health risks, helps students make better food choices and introduces them to a plethora of new healthy foods. Some people may think that if school lunches have junk foods and students get over weight from it they will grow out of it however, fifty percent of students that are over weight stay over weight as a adult

The nutrients and energy gained from eating a good breakfast helps with the maintenance of cell growth and regeneration, as well as keeping the body well-nourished while giving it the ability to perform at peak levels. Children and breakfast: Studies show that children who eat a good breakfast do better in school than children who do not. Lack of breakfast or an inadequate breakfast may result in a nutritionally inadequate diet, influencing learning in a number of ways: The hunger resulting from skipping breakfast may cause children to exhibit: Nervousness Irritability Disinterest in learning Listlessness Lack of concentration Learning disabilities Behavioral problems Poorer language development Slower thinking Slower memory retrieval Poor memory retention Lower

In the article “Attacking the obesity Epidemic by First figuring out its cause” by Jane E. Brody. She reflects on how “ children aged 2 to 19 consume seven trillion calories of sugar sweetened beverages a year.” Also in that article she says, “Schools that introduce healthful foods in the classroom have shown that they are more likely to be eaten in the lunchroom and at home.” Thinking about it seven trillion sugar sweetened beverages is a lot. By improving our school food students will be more physically fit.

ROUGH DRAFT For the past few years in the United States school lunches did not have healthy programs that could help kids with their nutritional balance, now in days the government create a new program that can help school to have a better nutrition. School lunch’s in the United States need to be healthier, they are critical for the wellbeing of the majority of people from 6 to 18, and also set the pattern for a healthy life style throughout adulthood. First, in the United States most of the children’s need to be healthier because the food they consume is the energy they need for the rest of the day “when children’s don’t eat healthy lunch, it is harder for them to concentrate at school and to master the energy for after school activities

Lowndes County Schools Director of Nutrition says,“The requirements are meant to give children healthier options”(Campbellsville University Online Programs). For the first time in 15 years the government has put a drastic meal change in place in public schools. Many individuals believe these changes aren 't for the best. Two of every three americans are overweight or obese, therefore the government decided to start controlling school lunches through a fantastic program called the National School Lunch Program. The new standards align school meals with the latest nutrition science and offer a variety of food choices.

Sophie Henderson thinks it is worth the money for bagels but not the other choices. In conclusion, the school district has made major changes to the school lunch program to save money, but those changes have changed students thoughts on the quality of the

This opinion piece shows the new school lunch programs intent to have healthier lunches has proved otherwise. Michelle Obama created this program to help childhood obesity and hunger by making school lunches healthier and more available to kids in poverty. This program expires in September and this article believes the new program will need to be changed to stay in effect. First, the piece expresses how much is spent of the Hunger-Free Kids act, which is $12 billion a year and an additional $3 billion for the breakfast program. This program covers almost half of American kids.