(Racial Profiling) 9/11 was a day in history that nobody could forget but even with this we should not use racial profiling as a way of security. There are many other techniques police and airports could be using other than racial profiling. With the technology we have now there is no need for racial profiling to be used. Stereotypes takes a big part in racial profiling. Racial profiling is an illegal discriminatory practice in which individuals are targeted for suspicion of crimes based on their ethnicity, race, or
Police officers are always looking for a target and they end up finding the perfect person to penalize. For example, many people are usually shocked when they find out that the reason they were pulled over was not, in fact, against the law, and end up penalized. In my opinion police officers should really focus on stopping crimes such as rapes, robbery, murders etc. Those crimes should have high penalties, but crimes such as speeding, driving without a license, carrying a small amount of drug should not equal the same prison time for a major crime for ethnic minorities. Therefore, unreasonable suspicions, pre-texts used by officers and jail time are things that play a huge role regarding the criminal justice system that affects the way ethnic minorities are
At the point when law authorization officers target occupants in light of race, religion or national source as opposed to conduct, wrongdoing battling is less successful and group doubt of police develops. An investigation of the Los Angeles Police Department demonstrated that minority groups that had been unjustifiably focused in the past keep on experiencing more prominent doubt and dread of cops. To find this inadequate strategy that undermines open certainty, we require more grounded strategies against racial profiling at all levels — from nearby to government — and also more compelling preparing and oversight of cops, and frameworks of responsibility. Twenty states have no laws forbidding racial profiling by law implementation, as indicated by a NAACP report discharged in September. Among states that do, the strategies shift generally in execution and adequacy.
It never shows how this individual may have been acting towards the officers. It is all about how the world sees things. If many police departments got body cameras, then there would be fewer stunts pulled, in my opinion. Why would the individual want them acting like a fool on camera? They would be less likely to harass the police and more likely to listen because now the police have a way to back up their story.
For modern police officers this an important principle, this is not always followed and not following this principle causes many unnecessary tragedies and conflicts. This principle should be used by the general public as well, in case of an incident, to only use self-defense if absolutely necessary. The seventh principle of peel is a really important for everyone to remember. This principal helps people understand that there is not much difference between the public and officers. The principal explains that the police are the public and the public are the police, the only difference is that police are payed and make it their full-time duty for modern police officers and public this is important for people to remember because of big divide between the
This isn 't great on the grounds that with cops speculation like that it gives them to some degree a need to overstep the law. They essentially feel that with the end goal them should implement the law they need to break some. Cops hone this unwritten manage all over the place, particularly Los Angeles ' CRASH unit. Debasement was so basic in the CRASH unit that they had standard systems to cover it up if something turned out badly. In general, the LAPD didn 't have the solid bolster it required from the group.
This indicates that the law enables policemen to interrogate bystanders, strangers, and ordinary citizens, and all for little to no effect. The NYPD are not extinguishing crime, they are merely biding their time as authority figures, as New York’s crime rate remains stagnant. The Stop-and-Frisk Law is widely based on the foundation of assumptions and anonymous tip-offs (“Terry...Transcript)."). This matter leaves stop-and-frisk procedures vulnerable to exploitation and unreasonable suspicion. Without any solid evidence to function off of, the NYPD are deluded with the illusion that they are taking measures to stop
We can see that this issue is not completely resolved. In the rape case, even if Serpico personally do not use violence to solve the problems but does not mean that another policeman would not. Frank Serpico is merely a patrolman and no power to interfere other policeman’s action. Serpico’s actions are ethical and believes in non-brutal methods to catch criminals.
Police officers should under no circumstances physically harm anyone for any reason. Officers have also in the past used informants as bait and put their lives in danger just to try and catch a criminal. We as citizens should be able to put our trust in these officer, but sadly that trust has been broken too many times. Officers that misuse informants can also with-hold evidence such as drugs or money for themselves and just continue this cycle and then put the blame on the informant that is more than likely already facing jail time. We should all make sure that police officers remain in check and that they do not receive too much power, because things like this happen.
At one point, I believe the statistic was that almost 99% of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones. This is a staggering statistic and clearly shows that gun free zones are not a valid solution. The criminals do not care what the law states, and so they will go ahead with their planned attack, but the law-abiding citizen who has a concealed carry permit issued to them will not be allowed to have their gun in these areas, and thus are unable to stop any threats that come their direction. Some people have grown up never being exposed to guns and thus only see them as a weapon of destruction and have fear when they hear people lobbying for more places where guns should be allowed. Some people also might have grown up around guns, but are just not fond of them, and that is also okay, but they should still be visualized as a valid measure of safety for the times when Law Enforcement Officers may not be present and a threat needs to be
Many don’t speck of this reality many people of color are facing today. Many are oblivious to what is going on because main stream media will never talk about issues like this. People of color are convicted of minor crimes that go ignored when whites commit the same crime and the punishment is not as harsh. These mass incarcerations can be seen as a system to control people of color, minorities, and poor whites in order to benefit the rich. There should be a law that prohibits harsh punishments for minor misdemeanors.
However, Anderson refuses to neglect the truth: they are the villains. Slamming any pre-existing admirable outlook readers may have had, Anderson inquires, based on his observations, “the authorities, particularly the police, paid scant attention and sometimes abused the victims themselves” (Anderson, 27). Philadelphia is notorious for its high crime rate, marking the police as almost a necessity to the function of everyday life. However, due to the mistreatment of citizens, people began to refer to the police as “ineffective” and “unworthy of trust.” The safeness of an area is key to the number of individuals using that public space, ultimately deeming the police a negative factor. In addition to the negative safety element, policemen also partake in plain acts of racism.