Addington V Texas 1979
A. O’Connor v. Donaldson 1975: In this precedent, the supreme court decided that the presence of mental illness alone is not enough to warrant involuntary confinement. If the patient is no longer found dangerous to him/herself or others, there is no justification to continue confinement. Commitment needs to be justified on the basis of mental disease and dangerousness. This precedent is applicable to the case of Mr. Y, because the statement above states dangerousness and mental illness as a basis for justifying continual commitment for Mr. Y. If the preponderance of evidence shows that Mr. Y is dangerous due to his mental disease, then deciding to civilly commit him would meet the requirement of this precedent case.
B. Addington v. Texas 1979: In this precedent case, the standard of proof for civil commitment was debated when the defendant, Mr. Addington appealed to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals, arguing that the court should have used the "beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof in his case. Although Texas is the only state where the preponderance-of-the-evidence satisfies due process, the court decided that the preponderance standard falls short because it increases the risk of erroneous commitment and does not fully consider the
…show more content…
Foucha v. Louisiana 1992: The decision made by the Supreme Court in this preceding case was that the basis of dangerousness alone does not justify involuntary commitment. The standard for involuntary committed for civilly committed individuals should remain the same for reason of insanity acquittees. The case of Mr. Y, falls under this precedent. For one, in this precedent case, the acquitted has the burden of proving that he is not dangerous: as stated earlier Mr. Y similarly has the burden of proving that he is not dangerous. Also dangerousness only wouldn’t be enough to detain Mr. Y, and as you can see Mr. Y basis for continued civil commitment is tied to the presence of dangerousness as a result of his mental
Austin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 PagesFollowing a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.
1971 Washington Court Case Study
379 Words | 2 PagesThe conduct of the defendant’s in the 1971 Washington Court of appeals case, State v. Williams, while neither advisable nor necessarily admirable, was justified given their valid concerns about losing possibly losing custody of their son if they sought medical help due to their Native American heritage. Walter Williams and Bernice Williams made the fateful decision to not take their 17-month old son, who was thought to only have minor tooth-ache, to the hospital due to concerns that such hospital visit would result in them losing custody of their son. Unfortunately, for the co-defendants, their son’s illness was much more severe than initially thought and their decision not to seek care resulted in both the son’s death and a manslaughter conviction
Texas Vs Johnson Case Study
470 Words | 2 PagesDissenting opinion for Johnson Is there any sort of consequences to someone if they burn the American Flag? In the U.S Supreme Court case “Texas v. Johnson”, Johnson was jailed by the start of Texas due to the desecration of the American Flag. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted his case, and the majority opinion of the case decided it was not a criminal offence to burn a flag because of the First Amendment. We the dissenting opinion believe that the burning of the American Flag should be a criminal offence.
Ayla Case Law Essay
1864 Words | 8 PagesBefore the court can evaluate the specific details of this section, they must first re-define what a mental disorder is based on case laws. There are three crucial cases which contributed in shaping the definition of a mental disorder: Cooper v. R., R. v. Bouchard-Lebrun, and R. v. Stone cases. In Cooper v. R. (1980), Justice Dickson defines disease of the mind— also known as mental disorder— as the following: ...“[D]isease of the mind” embraces any illness, disorder or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning… [where of] such intensity as to render the accused incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the violent act or of knowing that it is
The Supreme Court Decision Of 1954 In The Case Of Hernandez V. Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesThe Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 in the case of Hernandez v. Texas was the start of a breakthrough for Mexican Americans in the United States. The case was brought to existence after Pete Hernandez was accused of murder in Jackson County, a small town called Edna, Texas. The special thing about this case that makes it significant was the jury that were including in this trial. It was said that a Mexican American hadn’t served on a jury in the county of Jackson in 25 years. With the help of a Mexican American lawyer, Gustavo Garcia, the case was brought to the highest court level and was beheld as a Violation of the constitution.
Insanity Defense Of Andrea Yates
935 Words | 4 PagesDr. Mark Nolan, Senior Lecturer at ANU College of Law, says that the NGRI plea “enables defendants to avoid criminal liability and standard criminal punishment” (Nolan 8). The main disagreement with America is the focus whether if the “guilty defendant” pursues to misuse the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” as an alternative to imprisonment or if the criminally accused was at the time of committing the crime “clinically insane” and in need psychotherapy. Therefore, during this discussion of opposing viewpoints concerning the insanity defense being misused or ethical are going to be
Court Case Of Rigoberto Molina
1372 Words | 6 PagesINTRODUCTION: This case involves suspect Rigoberto Molina being arrested for pushing his girlfriend, victim Philomena Verceles during an argument, causing her to fall/hit a table that was located in the room. During my interview with Molina, he was crying hysterically, angry, and made suicidal statements. Based upon Molina’s statements and actions, I formed the opinion that Molina is a danger to himself/other. Officer Acosta #0047, responded to the scene and placed Molina on a 72 hour mental health evaluation; pursuant to WIC 5150.
Analysis Of Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson
555 Words | 3 PagesIn the chapter named “Mitigation”, Stevenson focused solely on the treatment of individuals with mental illnesses in the criminal justice system. In many instances, prosecutors and judges neglected to consider mental and intellectual disabilities when
Texas Supreme Court Case Analysis
1338 Words | 6 PagesJudges manage to cover legal procedures Including hearings and trials. The lawyer will argue the client cases in front of judiciary, and the judge makes certain that the plaintiff and defendant lawyers follows the rules courtroom and meets criteria set by the law. In rare types of cases, judges hear evidence from both sides and come to a judgment on their own. In other cases, judges give a jury instructions so that they can come to a majority ruling of innocent or guilty. However, most states have their individual qualification, but the basics criteria to have a bachelor's degree, pass the admission tests LSAT, graduating Juris Doctor, the bar, becoming the licensed lawyer and American citizen and resident of the state with intent practicing law.
The Case Of Alberta Lessard Under The Wisconsin State Mental Health Act
737 Words | 3 PagesLessard has a right to know why she was attained. Secondly the court found that Wisconsin had violated Ms. Lessard rights by not given her adequate notice of all her rights, including the right to have a jury by trial is required by law, and thirdly it is unconstitutional to hold someone for forty eight hours without a hearing and detention longer than two week with a full hearing was also unconstitutional (Remington, 1973). Another finding was that everyone has a right to counsel when it comes to civil commitment, and that hearsay evidence cannot be admitted in a civil commitment and that if a person is given a psychiatric evaluation it cannot be used against them. (Remington, 1973) both mentally ill and a danger to others, a person cannot be held without less restrictive alternatives which simply mean that a person who is mental ill do not have to put away if they have not committed no crimes (Remington, 1973).at all need to be held
Insanity Defense Reform
92 Words | 1 PagesIn refers to class discussion, as a result of the M’Nagthen case, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) is only use when the defendant does not understand the nature of the crime committed. Therefore, although neurosis or personality disorders qualify as a mental disease according to the DSM-5; the law has eliminated these types of disorders from being utilized in courts as a form of defense. The law has also excluded the irresistible impulse or inabilities to comply with the rules as a means of defense in the federal
8th Amendment Capital Punishment
1708 Words | 7 PagesYet, there is a significant proportion of death row inmates are mentally ill and the research evidence found suggests that mental illness is often, in fact, an aggravating factor as far as capital sentencing bodies are concerned. The Supreme Court eventually came to the conclusion of this: “If it is cruel and unusual punishment to hold convicted criminals in unsafe conditions, it must be unconstitutional to confine the involuntarily committed - who may not be punished at all - in unsafe conditions” (French, 2005) There are rights that each individual has, and there needs to be guidelines to make sure each person is treated fairly, even if they do not deserve such
Criminally Responsible Law
1035 Words | 5 Pages"The median amount of time taken to complete adult NCRMD cases was 132 days, which is 17% longer than the 113 days taken for non-NCRMD criminal court cases." (Miladinovic, Z., & Lukassen, J., 2015, February 25) This data demonstrates that those in charge of the case must know the case in order to set a just trial. "The verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) is a final decision reached when a judge or jury finds that an accused was suffering from a mental disorder while committing the criminal act and as a result is exempt from criminal responsibility (Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, s.672.34). An individual found NCRMD is neither acquitted nor found guilty (Latimer and Lawrence 2006); the court or Review Board may make one of three dispositions: absolute discharge, conditional discharge, or detention in a hospital (Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, s.672.54)."
Case Brief Lawrence Vs Texas
1672 Words | 7 PagesLawrence v. Texas: 539 U.S. 558 Facts of the case: In a private residence community, the Houston police had gotten a call about a weapons disturbance in the apartment of John Lawrence. John Lawrence was having drinks with two other people, who were Robert Eubanks and Tyron Garner, a few hours before the weapons disturbance was reported. Robert Eubanks, jealous of John Lawrence and Tyron Garner flirting with one another, decided to get a soda at a vending machine and called the police saying “a black male going crazy with a gun” was in the apartment (The New Yorker). The Houston police arrived at 11 pm to the unlocked apartment and entered to find John Lawrence and Tyron Garner having consensual intercourse.
Community Mental Health Act Of 1963 Essay
1349 Words | 6 PagesIntroduction Prior to the mid-1960 virtually all mental health treatment was provided on an inpatient basis in hospitals and institutions. The Community Mental Health Act of 1963 was established with its primary focus on deinstitutionalizing mentally ill patients, and shutting down asylums in favor of community mental health centers. It was a major policy shift in mental health treatment that allowed patients to go home and live independently while receiving treatment, (Pollack & Feldman, 2003). As a result of the Act, there was a shift of mentally ill persons in custodial care in state institutions to an increase of the mentally ill receiving prosecutions in criminal courts.
More about Addington V Texas 1979
Austin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 Pages1971 Washington Court Case Study
379 Words | 2 PagesTexas Vs Johnson Case Study
470 Words | 2 PagesAyla Case Law Essay
1864 Words | 8 PagesThe Supreme Court Decision Of 1954 In The Case Of Hernandez V. Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesInsanity Defense Of Andrea Yates
935 Words | 4 PagesCourt Case Of Rigoberto Molina
1372 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson
555 Words | 3 PagesTexas Supreme Court Case Analysis
1338 Words | 6 PagesThe Case Of Alberta Lessard Under The Wisconsin State Mental Health Act
737 Words | 3 PagesInsanity Defense Reform
92 Words | 1 Pages8th Amendment Capital Punishment
1708 Words | 7 PagesCriminally Responsible Law
1035 Words | 5 PagesCase Brief Lawrence Vs Texas
1672 Words | 7 PagesCommunity Mental Health Act Of 1963 Essay
1349 Words | 6 Pages