ipl-logo

Obedience In Stanley Milgram's 'The Perils'

1262 Words6 Pages

Karen Perez Professor Cirlio English 102 March 7,2023 Formal Essay #2 Final Draft What is obedience? According to the Oxford English Dictionary, obedience is compliance with an order, request, law, or submission to another's authority. Whether individuals are aware of it or not, obedience is an integral part "in the structure of their social lives." The children are submissive to their parents, and the parents are submissive to their elders. Everyone is subservient to someone, whether it be an employer, the police, or the law; obedience is a part of the social hierarchy. Few individuals have the resources to oppose such authority, as doing so can tarnish their reputation in the eyes of society. Obedience to a person or a thing …show more content…

The CivilWarLand is a family-oriented theme park close to closing as the gangs have been vandalizing and creating problems for the park owner Mr.Alsuga. Mr.Alsuga is determined to keep the park open, using the narrator and other characters to do his dirty work regardless of the consequences. In "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram conducts an experiment to test how far people are willing to bend their morals and go against their own conscience to appease the authority figure, in this case, the Experimenter. Milgram's hypothesis was proven wrong as the majority of people would go against their conscience and appease the authority figure despite the harm they were doing to the learner. Milgram's experiment demonstrated that people would go to extreme lengths to obey a superior, regardless of the consequences. Saunder's story refutes Milgram's explanations because the narrator's obedience to Mr. Alsuga, the big boss, was motivated by personal gain despite having reservations on …show more content…

Alsuga. As a married father of two children who must provide for his family, the narrator has many incentives to be the "clean-up man." Milgram's experiment was initially created to see how people would perceive authority, even if it was against their morals. The experiment consisted of the experimenter, teacher, and learner. In the experiment, Milgram uses purposeful deception as the teacher is the naive subject and is told they are participating in a memory and learner psychology experiment and are in charge of delivering shocks to the learner, who, in fact, is an actor. The majority of the participants in the study were obedient to the experimenter even though the experimenter "did not threaten the subjects with punishments such as loss of income, community ostracism or jail for failure to obey. Neither could he offer incentives" (Milgram 651). Despite having nothing to gain, the subjects continued participating in the experiment. The participants continued to administer shocks to the student because they were instructed to

Show More
Related

Stanley Milgram: The Perils Of Obedience

248 Words | 1 Pages

Stanley Milgram: The Perils of Obedience Stanley Milgram experiment is concerning peoples’ willingness to conform to an authority figure. The question Milgram was trying to answer was would a subject kill with electrical shock, due to an authority figure instructing them too. One individual was the learner being hooked up to electrodes, however, not literally.

Read More

Analyzing Milgram's Article 'Obey At Any Cost'

359 Words | 2 Pages

In the article, ‘Obey at any cost’, Milgram’s reason for research was because Milgram believed humans obey authority even when obeying authority could change their own behavior. Milgram’s experiment consisted of 40 men. The men were paid so they would all stay throughout the experiment. The participants were told a “story” telling them that it was a study on the effect of “punishment on learning.” They then had to draw a paper out of a hat to determine their roles.

Read More

Stanley Milgram's Experiments On Obedience To Authority

1208 Words | 5 Pages

This concept sparked a curiosity in psychologist Stanley Milgram to discover how authoritative figures influence a person's decision making---which soon led him to conduct his most famous experiments known today. After watching Nazi generals, one after the other, plead they were only following orders during the Nuremberg trials he took away one main concept; people can, and will blindly follow authority. To test this idea,

Read More

Similarities Between The Perils Of Obedience And The Stanford Prison Experiment

1154 Words | 5 Pages

In 1963, Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a controversial, but highly revered, study on obedience. The experiment was designed to test people’s morals versus an extreme authority, but, as predicted, obedience prevailed. Then in 1973, Philip G. Zimbardo created his own experiment, not unlike Milgram’s, that analyzed the potential of individuals to withstand the pressure of succumbing to an obedient role based on the environment. Both Stanley Milgram, author of “The Perils of Obedience,” and Philip Zimbardo, author of “The Stanford Prison Experiment,” conducted these experiments to show how an ordinary person’s obedience could be affected based off of the situation they are put in.

Read More

Why Is The Milgram Experiment Re-Created Today

1509 Words | 7 Pages

When the Milgram obedience experiments were being conducted the core of the experiments were all based on the false impression that an electrical shock would be administered to another individual at the push of a button with an incorrect answer, when in fact they weren’t. If the Milgram experiments were not based on lies and each participant did in fact administer a shock to another individual in response to a wrong answer, I feel that the results would have been the same with no alternative result. The reason for this would be because from the very beginning of the experiment the participants already believed that they would be actually administering an electrical shock. The participant’s reactions and concerns before, during and even after the experiments were all real with their true feelings and thoughts about their participation of either walking away from the experiment or completing the experiment. If the participants were to know that the electric shocks they were administering were not real, then the whole purpose of the experiment would have been useless and unnecessary.

Read More

Why Is Milgram's Research Important?

950 Words | 4 Pages

(Russell 2014) Conclusion: Despite controversy Milgram’s experiment was ground breaking. It remains relevant today and is frequently cited in demonstrating the perils of obedience.

Read More

Obedience And Authority Theory Milgram

1513 Words | 7 Pages

Obedience can be defined as complying to an order given by an authority figure. It involves changing an individual’s behaviour because an authority figure has told them to do so, not due to their own beliefs and so can be seen as a form of social influence. Stanley Milgram was motivated by his background as his family were Jews who were persecuted by the Nazis. He was interested in whether the Nazis were following orders from authority figures or were carrying out these acts on their own behalf. In 1963, Stanley Milgram conducted one of the most famous studies on obedience and authority figures (McLeod, 2018).

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

810 Words | 4 Pages

Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.

Read More

Sociology Matters Chapter Summaries

610 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, in order for Milgram’s experiment to work the people had to obey and do what the researchers told them to do. The definition of obedience defined in the book is, “...a compliance with higher authorities in a hierarchical structure. ”(Schaefer, 103) This is exactly what happened in the experiment.

Read More

Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram

1205 Words | 5 Pages

The author explains that there are many philosophies about obedience but they don’t give much information about the behaviors of subjects in critical or complicated situation. Milgram sets up an experiment at Yale University to see the reaction of a citizen when ordered by the experimenter to hurt other person. The author

Read More

Chapter Summary Of The Book 'Opening Skinner's Box'

708 Words | 3 Pages

His experiment was all a hoax. The shock machine was fake. All he wanted was to know how many people would be obedient and how many would be defiant. Much to Milgram’s surprise sixty-five percent of people did what were told of them, and only thirty-five percent were

Read More

Chapter Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box By Lauren Slater

829 Words | 4 Pages

She found that the person, who was defiant for the experiment, was a soldier who murdered Japs, and didn’t feel ashamed for it. He also kept Milgram’s cover and never told a soul about his experiment, even though it was an atrocious experiment. She also found out, that the person who was obedient in the experiment lived a great, normal life. After being in this type of observation, this subject felt that it helped him with life. He found how easily he was manipulated in such a test, that he began to become stern with himself and learned to deal with such expectations.

Read More

Stanley Milgram Experiment Essay

663 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand research has suggested (Haslam and Reicher ) that people do not always obey orders in the face of authority. As Haslam and Reicher ( ) studied the prods used in Milgram’s experiments and found that participants objected strongly to prod 4 given by the experimenter stating that ‘’you have no other choice ‘’ by insisting that they do by discontinuing. In addition to this identification was found to be a strong predictor of the maximum level of shock administered. As the participants identification with the learner was a strong negative predictor of the maximum level of shock delivered, whereas identification with the experimenter was a moderate yet non-significant predictor of the maximum level of shock delivered, this closely resembled the behaviour observed

Read More

Hitler's Essay: The Perils Of Obedience

1596 Words | 7 Pages

We have been trained to be obedient to authority. This quality is deep-rooted in us all from the manner in which we were brought up. It is natural for people to obey orders from those whom they recognized as their authority. This is the natural response to legitimate authority and can be learnt in a variety of situations. In a summary written in the article “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 1974), states: “The legal aspects of obedience are of enormous import, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations.”

Read More

Applying Milgram's Four Theories Of Obedience

832 Words | 4 Pages

Authority figures are the second factor that a person’s obedience depends on. Someone who has higher status than you in the system would be deemed worthy of you obeying. Examples of this can be a prime minister or army general against a shadow cabinet MP or Private, even your Boss against yourself. The final defining factor as to whether you obey or not is the legitimacy of the order you are being given.

Read More

More about Obedience In Stanley Milgram's 'The Perils'

Related Topics

Open Document