ipl-logo

Objectives To Moral Relativism By C. S. Lewis

422 Words2 Pages

C.S. Lewis had three main objectives to moral relativism. The first one is the Moral law of right and wrong. Lewis says, “whenever you find a man who says he does not believe in right and wrong, you will find the same man going back on this a moment later” (Lewis, 2007, p.19). “He may break his promise to you, but if you try breaking one to him he will be complaining” (Lewis, 2007, p.17). What Lewis is saying is that people often feel that if someone does something wrong to them then it is morally wrong, however when the roles are reversed and they do something wrong to someone else then it is not morally considered wrong from their point of view. Lewis second objective to moral relativism is the instincts of moral law as just a herd instinct. …show more content…

He says, “we sometimes do feel the desire to help another person and no doubt that desire is due to the herd instinct” (Lewis, 2007, p.19). Having a desire to help is quite different from feeling that you ought to help whether you want to or not” (Lewis, 2007, p.19). Lewis uses the example of hearing the cry from the man and having two desires. “The first desire is to help (due to your herd instinct), and the other desire to keep out of danger (due to the instinct for self-preservation)” (Lewis, 2007, p.19). He calls these impulses. The third objective is morality being something that is put into us by education. Lewis says that “he only asks the reader to think of what a totally different morality would mean, and to think of a country where people were admired for running away in battle, or where a man felt proud of double-crossing all the people who have been kindest to him” (Lewis, 2007,

Show More
Related

  • John Lewis Turning Points Essay

    838 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Lewis had many occasions where he didn't have to do something, but he choose to, then the other way around where he

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism Vs Female Circumcision

    102 Words  | 1 Pages

    Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

    Read More

  • Moral Relativism Mary Midgley Analysis

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

    Read More

  • From The Perspective Of C. S. Lewis And Reinhold Niebuhr

    2312 Words  | 10 Pages

    S. Lewis believes humans are inherently good and points to our natural sense of right and wrong and good intentions as a sign of this goodness. According to C. S. Lewis, humans have a natural moral law that helps us differentiate between what is right and wrong. For example, if you saw a man drowning, would you help him? C.S Lewis says that “You probably want to be safe much more than you want to help the man who is drowning: but the Moral Law tells you to help him all the same” (Lewis 10). The moral law is different from our natural instincts of self-preservation.

    Read More

  • James Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative

    1070 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

    Read More

  • What Makes Right Acts Right Analysis

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ross’s moral theory can be thought of as a compromise between utilitarianism and Kantianiasm. Even though Ross applauds the idea of benevolence in utilitarianism and the importance of justice, he disapproved of maximizing happiness as the main duty and stating that the moral rules were absolute. The basis of Ross’s moral theory lies in the concept of prima facie; the “duty” performed based on the relationship between certain individuals. Ross means that in any situation the individual needs to decide which relationship is most important to them at that time when making decisions. His main argument consists of: 1.

    Read More

  • Cultural Differences Argument For Moral Relativism

    1178 Words  | 5 Pages

    ”(p.19) This shows that in the study of ethics, the study of moral relativism to be more specific, the idea of universal truth does not exist. That is to say what is perceived as “good” or “right” can vary form culture to culture, so there is no way to have one universal truth. Two major examples of cultural differences that are often cited in Support

    Read More

  • Lewis's Argument For The Existence Of The Law Of Human Nature

    623 Words  | 3 Pages

    In making the argument for the existence of the Law of Human Nature, C.S. Lewis first establishes the acknowledgement of a few different universal laws that man in subjected to. There is the law of gravity, in which Lewis insinuates that in the eyes of gravity, the body of man and a mere stone are one and the same. Then there are biological laws that correspond with those than an animal has. However, the one law that is specific to man and that man is free to disobey or get “mistaken”, is the “Law of Nature or decent behavior” (Lewis). C.S. Lewis uses inductive reasoning to form this kind of logic by first making the observation that even though throughout time man has seemed to have had different agreements of what they believe to be moral,

    Read More

  • Moral Relativism In Criminal Justice

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Cultural Relativism

    1020 Words  | 5 Pages

    Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism In Social Media

    2321 Words  | 10 Pages

    In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism In Schindler's List

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethical relativism is the belief that actions are right or wrong depending on the norms of a society. Ethical relativists decide on a moral issue by taking into account societal norms and mob mentality, not deciding what is absolutely right or wrong. The Nazis in Schindler’s List are ethical relativists because they judge what is right or wrong according to their society and the Nazi Party. Since they were young, the Nazi’s were taught to believe that the Jews were animals, not human beings. If the young Nazi’s in training questioned this or did not agree, they were punished and seen as a traitor to Germany.

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay

    2607 Words  | 11 Pages

    In general, on a popular argument for ethical relativism would be the untenability of objectivism. It is a persuasive justification for moral relativism because it is the best alternative following the failure of objectivism. The fact that moral objectivists themselves are uncertain, incongruent and unsettled on a standard moral system is the primary catalyst encouraging moral skepticism (IEP, Argument for Moral Relativism). Cultural relativism outlines that “an action is morally right, relative to a culture, just because it is right according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.” Conversely, if “an action is morally wrong, relative to a culture, just because it is wrong according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.”

    Read More

  • Hutcheson's Moral Sense

    1093 Words  | 5 Pages

    The point is that moral approvals and disapprovals done by our moral sense are specific in nature and only operate when there is an action that can be appropriately judged of by our moral sense. Reasoning and information can change the evaluation of the moral sense, but no amount of reasoning can or does precede the moral sense in regard to its approval of what is for the public good. The moral sense approves of the good for others. This concern for others by the moral sense is what is natural to humankind, Hutcheson contended. Reason gives content to the moral sense, informing it of what is good for others and the public good

    Read More

More about Objectives To Moral Relativism By C. S. Lewis

Open Document