ipl-logo

Obligatory Sentencing Case Study

240 Words1 Page

The United States has generally been unmistakable in the force concurred privately chosen officials to decide the degree of discipline to which a criminal litigant is uncovered, constrained essentially by the caution of juries, judges, and post-sentencing authoritative discharge methodology (parole). Sensibly we may expect the ascent of detainment to be connected to increments in the level of prosecutorial caution to figure out why should likely go to jail and for to what extent, or diminishes in countervailing institutional keeps an eye on that carefulness. Both patterns have been valid in differing degree crosswise over U.S. corrective frameworks. Obligatory least sentences laws that got to be well known for medication and other off ensues

Show More
Related

  • Procedural Due Process Safeguards

    160 Words  | 1 Pages

    In a landmark Supreme Court case involving procedural due process safeguards, the court held that certain requirements must be met when an individual parole is revoked. Based on this case, the court found that due process requirements must be invoked in three stages; the defendant’s deferred sentence, completion of certain terms of probations and whether the defendant successful completes the probation terms or not (Oram & Gleckker, 2006). Since the Supreme Court hasn’t addressed the issue of due process clause under a drug treatment court, a few states have addressed the issue using the landmark Morrissey Supreme Court case to apply whether due process requirements is applicable to proceedings (Oram & Gleckker, 2006). Applying due process

    Read More

  • Essay On Disparity In Sentencing

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    Sentencing disparity within the American Judicial system is a problem that exists across the nation. According to Merriam Webster’s dictionary, disparity means the markedly distinct in quality or character. Many times, disparity is used in conjunction with discrimination as if the two words mean the same, but they do not. Disparity will include a difference in treatment or outcome but is not based on an opinion, bias or prejudice.

    Read More

  • Model Rule Sentencing Case Study

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ashley Smith CRJU 1400 LU 7 Review Questions Review Questions for Learning Unit Seven What governs the ethical conduct of lawyers? Discuss the pros and cons of plea bargaining. What has the U.S. Supreme Court held in regards to the professional misconduct of prosecutors? (in terms of punishment) How do forfeiture laws help to deter the conduct of mob lawyers?

    Read More

  • Remarkable Court Decision And The Future Of Prisons In America, By Jonathan Simon

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Now, approximately four decades later we are in the precipice of yet again a “new common sense”. Unlike the last approach, this will put the human dignity of prisoners back at the constitutional center of the Eighth Amendment, have better approaches to handling mental illnesses that can lead to incarceration, and effective crime prevention strategies. Simone’s use of the federal court challenges and decisions in his book ultimately shows us a way to legally dismantle mass incarceration and prompts our society to examine and change our view of incarceration and our response to

    Read More

  • Indeterminate Sentencing Model

    180 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the United States, there are two primary models; Indeterminate and determinate sentencing. Indeterminate sentencing refers to blending decisions provided by the sentencing judge and later from a release authority so the actual time served can be determined. The judge will sentence offenders to indeterminate sentencing during the time of the sentence including the maximum or minimum amount of time that’s to be served. Once an offender serves the minimum amount of time they are qualified for a release by the parole board. However, the maximum sentence may have to be served by the offender if the parole board doesn’t grant an early release.

    Read More

  • Eight Amendment Pros And Cons

    1219 Words  | 5 Pages

    In addition to the narrowly drawn remedy, the PLRA also issues that remedies must embody the “least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right meaning that no other relief is available.” The PLRA requires courts to seriously consider adverse impacts on items such as public safety or the general operation of the criminal justice system when determining the mode of relief. For example, in this case, the release of 46,000 prisoners could place citizens in danger. The placement of indicted criminals, who were, according to their sentence, supposed to remain within the prison system, back into society could be detrimental and result in safety issues. Additionally, the release of such prisoners could impact the operation or general integrity of the criminal justice system.

    Read More

  • John Burke Case Study

    1567 Words  | 7 Pages

    More people get incarcerated for non-violent crimes and crimes caused by mental illnesses or drug abuse (Webb, 2009) and because these people get put in regular prisons, instead of in mental health facilities or facilities to help against drug addiction, where they could be treated to further prevent crimes driven by their illness (Webb, 2009), the prisons get overfilled and cannot hold the more ‘important’ prisoners that needed to be locked away from the public. A strong link of the criminal justice process is that the system tries to keep it fair for everyone. Every defendant has the right to an attorney so they can be defended properly and fairly and “Only judges who are adequately informed about a case can effectively control the proceedings and examine evidence” (Tochilovsky, 2002) It is also important for the criminal justice system that those involved show discretion and although this is not always the case, discretion by the judges, police, etc.

    Read More

  • The Purpose Of Adult Drug Courts

    670 Words  | 3 Pages

    Due to the fact that drug courts are working to reduce crime, the policies and practices of the US government may have to be changed or strengthened in favor of drug courts. For example, in the Journal Do Drug Courts Work? Getting Inside the Drug Court Black Box (Goldkamp, White, Robinson, 2001), the authors say “Nevertheless, these findings also suggest that variation in drug court out comes may be explained by changes in the operation of the drug court and its ability to deliver the treatment and deterrent effects postulated by the collection of components inside the drug court black box”. This clearly shows that in order for drug courts to work and grow in numbers, changes in policies and procedures that are shown to reduce crime need to be implemented everywhere. Weaknesses that can be found in this summary are that all active drug courts in the US did not respond, which could lead to a very different outcome involving the effectiveness of drug courts as a

    Read More

  • Sentencing Reform Research Paper

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    The role of the government is to keep everyone and everything in line. The government should have a sentencing reform because with the system we have now it 's just making things worse. Some people are being placed in jail because of their color when there are real criminals that are set free when they really did do something wrong like murdering someone. The government should have a sentencing reform because the system now is just making things worse. To begin with, The government should have a sentencing reform because the system now is just making things worse.

    Read More

  • Essay On Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    1798 Words  | 8 Pages

    Defined as a public policy that imposes an outlined amount of prison time based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history, these sentences dictate that a judge must enact a statutory fixed penalty on individuals convicted of certain crimes, regardless of extenuating circumstances. Such laws have removed discretionary sentencing power from judges, instead focusing on severe punishments in line with national drug and crime concerns. While the original goal of mandatory minimum sentences was to deter potential criminals, reduce drug use, control judicial prudence, the policy has had extreme consequences such as sentencing imbalances and

    Read More

  • Mass Incarceration Research

    1751 Words  | 8 Pages

    A national assessment of 29 drug courts found that some these tribunals altogether diminish drug backslide and criminal conduct, both elements that improve the probability of imprisonment (Rossman, 2011). Research demonstrates that drug court members were necessarily more improbable than the examination gatherings to report utilizing illegal drugs (56% versus 76%) and had fundamentally less useful biomarker tests for drug use (29% versus 46%) at 18-month preliminary. Drug court members were likewise altogether more averse to report perpetrating violations (40% versus 53%). A meta-analysis of 18 essentially semi-exploratory investigations of psychological well-being court 's demonstrated that emotional wellness court members additionally would be wise to criminal equity results than comparative correlation bunches (Journal of Criminal Justice, 2011). Be that as it may, emotional well-being courts have for the most part not been compelling at enhancing psychological wellness results—and poor mental well-being results may add to inevitable detainment (Law and Human Behavior, 2011).

    Read More

  • Incarceration Policy

    1379 Words  | 6 Pages

    In contrast, stricter policy reforms were implemented into the courts due to the reflective increase in use of illegal substance among offenders. Moreover, the increase in violence and drugs among offenders enhanced stricter policy reforms, for more than 78.7% percent of offenders have used illegal drugs, which is three-fourth’s of the incarcerated population. Also, 62.2% percent of convicted drug offenders meet the diagnostic criteria of drug abuse or dependence that accumulates to be two-thirds of the populations, while 64.3% percent of offenders used an illegal substance regularly. In addition, convicted offenders have a high rate of 56.7% percent in committing recidivism, for Mark Harmon author of "Fixed ' Sentencing: The Effect On Imprisonment

    Read More

  • Indeterminate Sentencing

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. The difference between specific and general deterrence is the focus population. Specific deterrence focuses on deterring convicted offenders from repeating offenses. General deterrence focuses on deterring people who have not been arrested away from crime. 2.

    Read More

  • Ethics In The Criminal Justice System

    1279 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Pre-Trail Release

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper is to help show how sometimes judges can be Bias or inherent in the amount of bail set and other restrictions for pre-trial release while showing the concept of bail what can be done to prevent arbitrary and potentially prejudiced decisions from being made in the courtroom when it comes to bail by the judge, Also discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Introduction This paper will show the pros and cons of pre-release and define pre-trail release and bond, arbitrary. bond types also look into the factors of bail amounts a judge looks at to determine how much the defendant’s bail is and a few ways to prevent arbitrary and potentially Prejudice decisions from being made in the court by judges.

    Read More

More about Obligatory Sentencing Case Study

Open Document