Occupational Therapy In Australia Essay

Occupational Therapy in the Australian Culture
Occupational therapists in Australia are more than just designing and prescribing objects to fit an individual; It is about making those objects conform to the daily occupations the individual might do that they need to do, want to do, or must do that is meaningful in their everyday life. The first key consideration is understanding how ergonomics and rehabilitation are crucial to bringing efficiency to occupations in a meaningful context in the Australian culture. According to Freeman & Jauvin (2019), occupational therapists must look at occupations through occupational lenses and culture to determine the underlying occupations deficit and respond strategically to the approach that will be appropriate

Occupational balance is crucial, as knowing what occupations are meaningful and how both constructs are linked ensures that the occupation is balanced (Eklund et al., 2017). In addition, into looking at the patterns and occupational balance. A sense of community and an understanding of cultural diversity in Australia is essential for occupational therapists in theory and practice (Brown et al., 2021). Therefore, this key consideration is essential for an occupational therapist in Australia to be occupation-focused and bring efficiency and meaningful occupations to diverse cultures embedded in the Australian

According to Aas & Bonsaksen (2022), while occupational therapists are built on valuing and focusing on the occupation-based practice approach, they seem to spend less time on it and more time on impairment-based practices due to several barriers to the occupation-based approach. Occupational therapists' roles are to encourage and promote health and well-being through occupation-based practices for everyday occupations that are meaningful to the client and to provide the occupational therapist with an understanding and perspectives that will help contribute to the participation of the persons, the groups, and the populations for occupational engagement (Boop et al., 2022). According to Aas & Bonsaksen (2022), this study was cross-sectional on occupational therapists. The participants were occupational therapists, and the questionnaire was based on what was meant by occupations and occupation based through open-based questions. The study found that occupational therapists self-reported high levels of occupation-based practice daily. However, the findings suggest that occupation-based practice had barriers (lack of time/equipment) associated with the occupational therapist using less occupation-based practice. According to Brown et al. (2021), an associated barrier was due to Cultural willingness