Oedipus Rex and the Aristotelian Tragic Hero If you were to google the world tragedy, you would probably be left with multiple definitions that all say something along the lines of a tragedy is a play with tragic events and an unhappy ending. Despite what the dictionary may say, a tragedy is much more than that. Born in ancient Greece around the sixth century BCE, they evolved throughout the ages with Elizabethan tragedy blossoming in the sixteenth century, the Neoclassical tragedy developing in the seventeenth century, and the modern tragedy coming to fruition shortly after that (Conversi). Clearly for tragedy to have survived through the ages, it must be of value, but that value may be different to different people. One man who clearly articulated …show more content…
This he expressed in his literary criticism Poetics, where he also detailed his formula for the creation of a tragedy and a tragic hero. For each element of a tragedy, Aristotle provided a description of how the element should be executed in addition to an example from a well-known Greek author in the fourth century BCE. Most often, Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex was mentioned as an example of the ideal execution of an Aristotelian tragedy fit with a tragic hero. And although Oedipus Rex was written long prior to Poetics, its main character, Oedipus, is considered by many to be the epitome of a tragic hero, embodying all six essential elements. First, Oedipus is both virtuous and of noble status; however he does have flaws to prevent him from seeming too perfect. It is one of these flaws that becomes his hamartia or “tragic flaw”, leading to the hero’s downfall. Next, the crime caused by Oedipus' hamartia is punished, but although the punishment he receives is not wholly merited, it is not excessive and it must …show more content…
To Aristotle this was crucial to fulfill the play’s purpose of teaching, as he believed that we could only learn from those socially and morally above us. To firmly establish Oedipus’ nobility, Sophocles presents his nobility in multiple ways. First, Oedipus is born to noble parents, King Laius and Queen Jocasta, establishing the nobility of his blood. Despite Oedipus’ ignorance of this fact, most viewers of the time would have known this truth, making this noble birth relevant to the construction of the tragic hero’s nobility (Struck). Next, even should the audience not know the truth of Oedipus’ birth, they would soon be introduced to Oedipus' adoptive parents: the King and Queen of Corinth, who establish Oedipus’ status as a prince. Finally, Sophocles reinforces this noble status by having Oedipus crowned King of Thebes after he saves the city from the riddle of the Sphinx. This firmly establishes the idea that Oedipus is noble in his ancestry and by his own merit as it was his superior reason that allowed him to save Thebes. Oedipus’ virtues such as his sense of duty and empathy for his people becomes apparent early in the play. Oedipus reveals his sense of duty when he states that he would “do anything” to end the suffering of his people and that to not do so would be to “be blind to misery”, revealing his empathy towards his people (14). This presentation of virtues is
Oedipus’ inner blindness causes his status to become a static character and make him have his downfall because of his character flaws. Since he is a static character, meaning he doesn’t change his personality throughout the whole story, he has the same flaws during the beginning to the end of the story. These many flaws range from Oedipus’s arrogance to his selfishness. Oedipus’s flaws don’t just cause his downfall, but also many other conflicts in the story as well. One of his flaws that was listed earlier was his selfishness.
He is quick-tempered and spontaneous, which leads him to jump to conclusions, causing the reader to become aware of the fact that Oedipus is mortal and imperfect, henceforth with flaws. Oedipus’ error in judgment and tragic fall lead him to his downfall. His crime was due to wickedness and ignorance about his self-identity. He was not aware that Kind
Oedipus, the brainchild of Sophocles in his play Oedipus the King, matches well to what Aristotle defined as a tragic hero (Tragic hero as defined by Aristotle). He possesses hamartia (tragic flaw), peripeteia (reversal), and anagnorisis (full knowledge). This archetype of a tragic hero, though, was not rigidly followed by the modern model of a tragic hero. Perhaps the most prominent example of the twentieth-century tragic hero is John Proctor, the protagonist in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Though John Proctor shares the many characteristics of an ancient tragic hero i.e: hamartia, peripeteia and anagnorisis, he is different by definition of a tragic hero as interpreted by Arthur Miller.
Easily perceived as a target by a supernatural force, the concept of an acclaimed Greek Tragedy throughout history lies in the heart of the tragic hero. " Oedipus the King," a classic play written by Sophocles, involves the protagonist named Oedipus leaving his hometown, Thebes, in attempt to escape the fate determined by the gods; however, inevitably fails to save his parents and himself, justifying the belief that man should not oppose their fate. Hence, in the tragedy of "Oedipus the King," Oedipus is meticulously defined as a tragic hero in which he demonstrates his hamartia of overwhelming pride, in turn leading to negative repercussions to others' lives due to Oedipus's downfall. Sophocles's classic tragedy precisely demonstrates Oedipus
Oedipus the King is a tragedy that was written by Sophocles that emphasizes the irony of an irony of a man who was determined to trace down, expose and punish an assassin who in turn became him. Oedipus the King is also known as Oedipus Rex or Oedipus Tyrannus. The art is an Athenian play that was performed in ages approximated to be 429 BC. Oedipus the King would later in the play fulfill the prophecy that he would kill his father and later on marry his mother. There is a twist of an event in the play where Oedipus is looking for the murderer of his father to bring to a halt the series of plagues that are befalling Thebes but only to find he is in search of himself (Rado, 1956).
From the beginning Oedipus was destined to fulfill a terrible prophecy, but through particular events that follow the steps of the Hero’s Journey, Oedipus becomes a powerful king of Thebes, only to be destroyed by the prophecy that should have ended his life as a child. The Hero’s Journey typically leads to self-confidence and power, however; the Hero’s Journey of Oedipus leads to his tragic demise. The Hero’s Journey lays out the steps of Oedipus’s future actions, which create suspense, fear, pity, and other emotions that captivates the audience. Similar to many famous stories, Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles in 430 B.C., follows the Hero’s Journey path, which is evident in Oedipus’s departure, initiation, and return.
In conclusion, Oedipus in the play is a tragic hero. He is not the person who he thought he always were. He let his pride and having the authority to be king, destroy his life. Oedipus let his character make the best of him. In this case, life is not always what it seems to be.
Thesis:In Sophocles play ‘Oedipus the king’,Oedipus is an example of a tragic hero because he changed from a hero at the beginning of the play into a tragic hero by the end by experiencing power,tragic flow,downfall and death. Oedipus changes into a person no can believe of,because in the beginning he was a hero for the city of thebes by solving a riddle to defeat the monster that was killing and taking over thebes. Claim:Before the play Oedipus defeats sphinx and becomes a powerful king,At the beginning of the play people rely on Oedipus’s power and help. Data:For example the priest says “Oedipus greatest in all men’s eyes We pray,find some strength again and rescue or city”. Warrant:From this quote readers can see that how empowered oedipus feels like and how people in thebes rely on him,Clearly this scene represents the power stage of the tragic hero.
In the novel Oedipus Rex, the protagonist Oedipus Rex exhibits many flaws throughout the play. Whilst the novel,Critical Interpretations Dodds and Goulds essay argues that Oedipus “never possessed any flaws” (Bloom 1). However, one can conclude that he had two major flaws; which were, his ability to quickly accuse others instead of owning up to his mistakes, and his obsession with being the hero. While in the Tragic Hero essay, it is said that we should, “have sympathy with Oedipus” (Barstow 2). One must also glance back at the mistakes that Oedipus made along the play.
They ask him to be again the hero he once was when he saved Thebes from the Sphinx, however, in the end, Oedipus finds that he is the cause of this plague set upon his people. Frye’s quote “tragic heroes are so much the highest points in their human landscape” justifies the Theban’s acts of looking at Oedipus as the solution to end the plague. Oedipus is the definition of a tragic hero; he saved the city of Thebes, became king, sought to save the city again, but discovered that he was the cause of the city’s suffering and also his
In the play Oedipus is the only one that is able to solve the sphinx’s riddle which leads the city to making him their next king. Oedipus was there for the city in a time of need and shows his intelligence by solving the riddle. This act is what categorizes Oedipus as a hero, after saving the city from a crisis it shows he is willing to do anything in order to keep the city going and look after his people. He also does not like to keep secrets from his people, for example when Creon wants to tell Oedipus the oracle in private, Oedipus insists on making the news public to the people. Doing so shows that he wants the people to trust him and wants make it known to everyone that he can be in fact trusted.
Oedipus was a tragic hero he was seen as a great man and was king,but he fell to misfortune because of his disability to see past his pride and anger which led to his demise. By not being able to see past his pride and anger Oedipus was not able to to avoid his prophetic destiny. He was blinded by his pride and anger so much that it became his tragic flaw ultimately leading him to his
Oedipus Rex is a great example of an Aristotelian Tragedy because it follows each and every rule that Aristotle put in place, making in a cohesive and well known story. The first part of an Aristotelian Tragedy must be about a serious subject. Oedipus starts out as a quest to find and prosecute the Late King Laos's murder. Once a few insights into Oedipus's entangled past, it is ultimately a story about Oedipus uncovering his past, compared to Jocasta's. This is serious because the audience learns the basis of Pericles's Oedipus Complex, and the audience learn more about the horrific past of Oedipus.
The characters in Oedipus the King develop the plot and make it a complete tragedy. Oedipus, had some undesirable flaws as well as some good characteristics. Oedipus had a flaring temper that ruined his life. We all learned that having a bad attitude doesn’t get you anywhere in life. Oedipus was also arrogant, especially after defeating the Sphinx.
In ancient Greek society, the tragedy was a deeply spiritual and emotional art form integral to daily life. Perhaps one of the best examples of Greek tragedy is Sophocles’ Oedipus the King. The work is distinguished by the deep emotion and thought it elicits from the reader. This is in part due to Sophocles’ expert portrayal of Oedipus, who bears all the attributes of an Aristotelian tragic hero. A once powerful king turned blinded pariah, Oedipus is characterized by both his pride and his honorable character.