Four years after the French Revolution began, in January 1793 a group of about eighty men assembled in Oeller’s Hotel in Philadelphia to celebrate French victory at the battle of Valmy. This assemblage speaks not only to the camaraderie between Americans and French, but also, based on who was present at the dinner, represents a wider desire for a worldwide movement toward democracy. Even the way it was reported by the local newspapers implies the importance of this modest gathering.
Philadelphia, since before the inception of the Revolution, had been a hub of political creativity and debate, although this new political atmosphere, one in which the mob’s opinion was particularly made known, was not entirely appreciated by the higher classes.
…show more content…
Oeller’s hotel that night formed a new club, spurred by this patriotic spirit that had engulfed them. La Société Française des Amis de la Liberté et de l’Égalité de Philadelphie (The French Society of Friends of Freedom and Equality of Philadelphia), led by elected President Antoine Duplaine, was formed for the purpose of sending aid when possible to France. Another purpose of the club was to help the cause domestically whenever possible, such as in the case in February of 1793 when the Society helped ten French sailors stuck in Philadelphia. The club was met with some opposition from those in the authority in Philadelphia, likely Federalists in particular, who saw it as a potential menace to local …show more content…
Two of Philadelphia’s prominent newspapers were distinctly partisan. Sometimes this partisanship was made quite obvious in opinionated articles, but other times the difference between the two papers’ reporting of same story was a little subtler. In the case of the story of the celebration at Oeller’s Hotel, The Gazette of the United States, the Federalist publication, published in its article that men had joined to celebrate the “success of the Gallic arms against those of despotism,” a perfectly Federalist idea, provided that those “Gallic arms” were led and supported by strong centralized leadership in Paris. The National Gazette, slanted towards Democratic-Republicans, reported the story using almost the exact same words as The Gazette of the United States, but adding that “fifteen toasts, truly Republican, were drank” that night. This additional information presented with a subjective point of view shows the difference of focus between the two newspapers. One publication cares more about the victory of France and the spread of strong, non-monarchical government, and the other comments equally on Republican victory and the Republican celebration of that victory – the common people’s involvement in
This paper presents two essays written by Gordon Wood and Barbara Smith during the nineteenth century on the American Revolution. Both historians have different points of views and interpretation on what this revolution was really about. The purpose of these writings is to give a clear idea of the American Revolution to the readers and to make them closely think on how it affected people’s life and the society. On one hand, the historian wood declared that the revolution ended monarchy and led the society to democracy. He believed that this revolution was a good start to a new life for all Americans.
In “A Revolutionary People at War”, Charles Royster has developed a complex and in-depth thesis regarding the American Revolution. The book dives into the minds of the American people as it conveys the American character displayed throughout the Revolution. His book is multi-faceted, focusing on a number of themes that are beautifully intertwined. He discusses the prevailing American character during the American Revolution. The book studies the ideals of the American people during the revolution and how those ideals impacted the way the Continental Army was organized and how the Revolution was fought.
The American Revolution was a period where independence was growing immensely among the thirteen colonies of America. The struggle for independence was shown through persuasive literature and speeches spoken and or written by some of the most influential men in Americas early history attempting to persuade men in the thirteen colonies to fight against Britain for their freedom. Patrick Henry was one of these influential men. Patrick Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention addresses the delegates of the Virginia Convention with an ethos appeal that uses allusions, rhetorical questions, and parallelism to persuade the delegates to be on board with the idea of going to war with Britain. Patrick Henry uses allusions many times in his speech
Comparing French Jacobin acts to those of American Jacobins, Cobbett displayed evidence to American citizens presenting copious similarities between the two groups in aspects such as unauthorized public meetings and attempts by the group to force their representatives to vote correspondingly to their groups favored position on government issues (De Hartog
The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most
The American Revolution is arguably the turning point of American history as it resulted in somewhat of a significant, positive change in politics, economics, and society as a whole. However, from 1775 to 1800, the effects of the revolution on the American society were subtle as most principles glorified by revolutionists contradicted the examples set forth by colonial reality. Perhaps most alike to revolutionary beliefs was the American economy and how it participated in free trade or encouraged the independence of hard labor. Politically, the states did apply Enlightenment and republican ideas as promised, but more often than not, the benefits of such ideas were limited to rich, land-owning, protestant, white men. This glorification of
In the closing of this essay the commonalities between the American revolution, and the French revolution was clearly explained. The French revolution proved to be the deadliest, and most violent war than the American revolution causing change. Next, Touqueville’s likes and dislikes were examined showing that he enjoyed the public affairs, and associations while creating his dislikes. His dislikes were that the democracy in the United States with the equal majority can lead to the abuse of power. Finally, the essay explained Rousseau philosophy, and how his theory could pertain to the revolutions of those times.
The Republicans and the Federalists became known. The development of political parties helped to create a more divisive nation. Many saw this time and time again throughout the time of 1789 - 1800’s. For example, there were efforts to turn opinion against the Federalists in late 1791. This was when Philip Freneau began publishing the National Gazette.
On the guided tour of the Freedom Trail, specifically the Allegiance to Revolution tour, the retelling of the American Revolution concentrating on the white, upper class male allows for a dramatization and limited perspective of American history. The tour, which traveled from Faneuil Hall, to Paul Revere’s home, and finally the Old North Church, focused on the events between 1774 and 1775 that led the New Englanders to switch from trying to remain loyal to Great Britain and wanting a revolution for freedom. Instead of providing a complete portrayal of the New England people and their involvement in the events leading up to the American Revolution, the tour guide mentioned only men, specifically highlighting those in high social classes and
The American Revolution was a historical period in our nation’s legacy, and shaped the outcome of our country, the land of the free, as it is today. Being so close to the historic to the city of Boston, it’s important to recognize the crucial role the city had in the revolution. From 1761-1773, a series of events established a movement in British North America, starting in Boston in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and was embraced by more as English colonists filled their duty to play an active role in protecting their freedom and rights as British subjects. These events, the Stamp Act, The Boston Massacre, and the Boston Tea Party was a succession of events in which the people of Boston were reminding their government, the British Parliament, that they have crossed a line. By imposing taxes and oppressive policies on the American colonies, the British Parliament threatened their traditions of self-government and Bostonians defied them.
It’s been over 200 years since the original thirteen colonies of America fought their revolutionary war against Great Britain, in hopes of achieving their independence. We shall be going through a few areas of the Revolution, such as the military, social hierarchy, the role of men and women during the war, the colonists’ values of equality and their social contract response to the British government’s abuses, and we’ll compare these areas to the present day. The American Revolution started around April of 1775, when British redcoats and American militiamen exchanged gunshots in Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. However, that was only the beginning of the fighting; the reasons for the war date from years prior, when resistance from the
The authors topic is about the French revolution, the roots of revolution, how the revolution begins, how the new voting is, making a new nation and how they are going to make a new nation, reforming the church, the reign of terror, and the final end. Yes I agree with the argument in the French revolution that if we did not have the French revolution that we would still be under a king and a queen and we would not be Americans. The important conclusions in this book is The French Revolution concluded in 1799 with the fall and abolition of the French monarchy and the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte's dictatorship. In place of the monarchy, France established a democratic republic devoted to the ideas of liberalism, secularism and other philosophies that became popular during the Enlightenment. Despite the national devotion to republicanism, the empire grew increasingly authoritarian and militaristic under the leadership of
The main difference between the American and French Revoultion was that one successfully converted to a democratic government and one did not. The French Revolution was not successful in forming a democratic government due to France’s history of a monarchy, economic issues and divison among its’ people. Unlike America, France had a long history of sole rulers and dictatorship which made the change to a democratic government much more difficult and ultimately impossible. America’s motto of “all men are created equal” (Doc A) was the complete opposite of France’s dividing estate class system. The third estate consisted of peasents, common people and the bourgeoisie, the second estate belonged to the Nobles, and the first was the home to the Clergy.
Edward Mitchell 10/22/2016 English 10 Essay Unit 1 Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson played a large role in motivating the fight toward freedom in the weeks leading up to the Revolutionary War and immediately following it. Each believed in the fundamental right to be free from rule. Patrick Henry appealed to the people’s fear of war. Thomas Jefferson was able to convince people that together, they could form a new nation. The writings of each man reveals a very chaotic time in America’s history and the leadership, determination, and boldness of Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson ensured that when change came, the people were ready for it.
Maximilien Robespierre, the head of the Jacobin Club of Paris should not be spared a harsh judgment considering his involvement with the thousands of executions during the Reign of Terror. Robespierre and his Committee of Public Safety attempted to create a “The Republic of Virtue,” which is arguably an impossible task without entirely rebuilding the political systems of France, as one cannot declare another to be virtuous. Rather, creating a virtuous society requires an overturn of the entire system. Although Robespierre’s intentions in forming a “Republic of Virtue” may be admirable, such as the desire to form a republic based on Rousseau’s ideas of reason and natural law, the way in which he enforced his beliefs was immoral.