Oklahoma Jim Crow Law

On a word document, write 4 paragraphs (4-6 sentences each) on the following: 1. Merits/elements of Fisher v. UT- Austin Petitioner The Petitioner believes that Abigail Fisher was denied admission to the University of Texas Austin because UT had a race conscious admissions program. This violated the 14th amendment which grants rights and citizenship to all people born as naturalized citizens in the United States. The petitioner observed that before the individual was picked, some students were accepted based on their race. UT also did not show that their process (for how students were admitted) was necessary.

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union (35).’ This letter is very important because it contradicts everything that Lincoln said in his First Inaugural Address just seven months before this was written. In his address he stated that he didn’t have the authority from the constitution to interrupt slavery, but after the letter he was willing to ignore the whole Constitution and emphasize more or less powers in the dictatorship. It is also very important, according to DiLorenzo, to note that Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave. Chapter four gets down to Henry Clay’s “American System” which was Lincoln’s real agenda.

According to the FindLaw argued that Despite, with all these new laws passed by President Abraham Lincoln 's, African-American and ethnic minorities, did not get any equal right under the law. In fact, in 1896, we have the Supreme Court of the United States argued that, the state government have the power to separate different races as long as the separation were equal. This “Separate but Equal” The Supreme Court policy stayed there until 1954. In that same years the Supreme Court walk back to their decision in 1896, “Separate but Equal” because of the cases which involved schools’ discriminations in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. Also in the 1890, African-American did not have the right to vote, because of the “poll Taxes”,

The door on the 1963 side of the cartoon had said “Alabama Public Schools, whites only”(1963-political cartoon). During segregation times between blacks and whites, schools forbid blacks from going to school with the whites. They were required to go to a separate school, just like how they had to ride on separate sections of trains and buses. This has evolved over time because today, students of every race and color go to school together with no more segregation. The second door in the cartoon represents 2011 and says “Alabama Public Schools, No Latinos”(2011-political cartoon).

A federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked a directive allowing students to use bathrooms and locker rooms as per their gender identity. The ruling was pronounced before schools are scheduled to open for the next academic year. Texas and 11 other states had sued the Department of Education and Department of Justice over the directive which extends the Title IX law to interpret restrictions over bathroom use in accordance with birth genders as sexual discrimination. US District Judge Reed O 'Connor said that the federal education law in Title IX was not ambiguous about the definition of sex determined at birth. He wrote in his order that interpreting Title IX to change the definition of sex to include gender identity was outside the enforcement purview of federal government.

The 45th Alabaman Governor, George Wallace, declared in January of 1963, “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever (Dean).” In the 2000’s most people thought racial division and relations were behind them, but not in Birmingham. Segregation is still prevalent throughout Birmingham; whether it be segregation in school districts, healthcare, etc. In 2004, Alabama voters rejected an amendment to remove the segregated schools provision from the Alabama constitution. According to RacialinJustice.org, they state, “The amendment would have removed a provision from Article XIV, Section 256, of the Alabama Constitution of 1901, which reads: “Separate schools shall be provided for white and colored children, and no child of either race shall be permitted to attend a school of the other race” (Equal Justice Initiative). This just shows that Governor George Wallace’s words were wistfully true, in 2005 and

In 1957, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas’s decision, segregation in public education violated the Fourteen Amendment, but Central High School refused to desegregate their school. Even though various school districts agreed to the court ruling, Little Rock disregarded the board and did not agree to desegregate their schools, but the board came up with a plan called the “Blossom plan” to form integration of Little Rock High despite disputation from Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus. Desegregating Central high encountered a new era of achievement of black folks into the possibility of integrating public schools, and harsh resistance of racial integration. Although nine black students were admitted into Little Rock harsh violence and

Around the 1800s, the United Stated government was trying to figure out a way to remove the Indian tribes such as the Seminole, Cherokee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw from the southeast. Many American settlers wanted to remove the Indians there because they sawDuring President Jackson 's term of office, he signed the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1830. This Indian Removal Act, President Jackson let to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. There were tribes that left their lands peacefully; however, many other Indian people refused to relocate. In the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, one of the tribes known as Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the government.

Despite the US Supreme Court ruling that made segregation in schools illegal (in Brown v. Board of Education), school districts around the country continued to discriminate against Latino students. As [someone from documentary] mentions, “quote”. Although nearly half a century has passed since East L.A. Walkouts, limitations on Chicano Studies continue to occur. To understand the contributions of the ‘Walkouts’, we will paragraph 1 and challenges that the education of Chicanos currently face. Prior to the implementation from the federal government, such as English as a Second Language (ESL), College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP), and Executive Order 15333, Chicano students in California and Texas demonstrated protested which forced school districts and the United States government to focus on the issues.

“The Supreme Court decision of 1883 upheld Native American autonomy but Andrew Jackson refused to enforce it, but instead removed Native Americas from their land for white settlers. (Sanchez). Although, Native Americans considered themselves to be self-governing people, they were still being subjugated by the government. According to the presentation, Native Americans were not allowed to leave their land or else they would be sent away for six months and brought back to their reservation. (2016).