Oliver Cromwell is today in Britain held with great merit. He is seen by many Britons as the father of modern British democracy. However, his reputation in Ireland is quite different. Cromwell only spent nine months in Ireland yet even still he is seen by many Irish people as someone who was a genocidal monster hell-bent on massacring the Irish population. Cromwell’s attitude towards the people of Ireland can be seen through his writings. However, even when these are read confusion is still apparent. Having heard of soldiers murdering ‘the country people’ a proclamation was sent throughout Ireland on August 24th 1649 Cromwell declared to his forces , ‘I do hearby warn and require all Officers, Soldiers and others under my command henceforth …show more content…
Sinnot the commander of the Wexford garrison. In this letter Cromwell informs Sinnot that he should surrender if he did not want Wexford to be destroyed. Cromwell also informs Sinnot that if he were not to surrender he would be at fault for the spilling of innocent blood. It therefore seems likely that Cromwell did not care what happened to ordinary the ordinary people of Ireland so long as he was able to justify their killing. At both Wexford and Drogheda however the slaughter of innocent civillians was brutal and even by 17th century standards it was in no way justifiable. Even still certain facts must be pointed out. . This however is a very simplistic view of history. Oliver Cromwell’s methods were brutal; moreover, he certainly had both racist and sectarian attitudes. However, it seems that Oliver Cromwell was in Ireland on a revenge mission. He sought revenge for three reasons: the massacres of 1641, the setting up of the confederacy and Ireland Royalist position during the War of the Three Kingdoms. Yes, many people were targeted by the New Model Army because of their faith and ethnic background but there is no evidence that any policy of religious or ethnic cleansing was carried out. Cromwell’s invasion of Ireland is cannot be understood without first of all looking to the massacres of 1641. Cromwell himself referred to the Irish as ‘barbarous wretches’ because of the massacres that took place in Portadown of that year. It must be remembered that Cromwell possibly believed that 100,000 Protestants were massacred in the town as was said in England at the
Juan Seguin and Manifest Destiny Juan Seguin is a very influential man who played a significant role in the history of Texas, specifically the Texan Revolution. He was born in San Antonio de Bextar, Texas in the early 19th century, which at that time in history was part of Mexico. The Seguin family had lived in that area for several years. In the 1740s, the Seguin family had arrived in the San Antonio Valley, making them one of the oldest families in the area. Once a Spanish providence now under the control of Mexico, this area of land saw the migration of many Anglos.
“Were the American colonist justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain?” There comes a time in history when a nation needs to break the bands that hold them down from becoming a great nation. In this case, the colonists had the right to break the bonds from the British Empire in the 1700s. About one hundred colonists left Europe to seek religious freedom and make the unknown their new home. As the colonist moved into their new homes in America, the British wanted to make some money from their new colonies in America.
(Henry). The desire to fight was strong with those who had had enough of the king’s oppression. Patrick Henry presents his beliefs with passion and
Henry alludes to the Quartering Act because the act is another example of how the British are preparing for the war for freedom. The Quartering Act makes the delegates angry because they now understand that the only reason the act exists is so that Britain can be ready for the war against the colonies. This new discovery develops Henry’s viewpoint because it explains to the delegates that the colonies should not resist the war but, rather, the colonies should actually “let [the war for freedom] come.” To conclude, Patrick Henry develops his viewpoint on the necessity for fighting against the British by explaining how violence is a
Although some people may believe that the colonists should not have claimed independence from Great Britain, they were justified to claim independence. This is because, the Boston Massacre showed Britain had no respect for the colonists, The early taxes imposed were unfair to the colonists, and the Intolerable acts were too aggressive. The colonists had many reasons for leaving Great Britain's control. That was for many of the mistakes Britain made and probably regretted. The Boston Massacre showed Britain had no respect for the colonists.
The true instigation for the Reformation came from the people of England. They knew what they were fighting for and did not shy away from the consequences of exile. Also, as shown earlier, these people were mostly made up of the youth of England. O’Day moved on to further detract from the image of Henry as a great reformer. “But Henry himself, doctrinally a Catholic and sharing little with the early Protestants other than a dislike of the power of Rome, was unlikely to remain content for long with such limited approbation.”
He makes a second comparison when Oliver Cromwell, an influential English political leader known for his military skill, is acknowledged as parallel to Toussaint. Comparable to the juxtaposition to Washington, Phillips appears to dismiss the meager dissimilarities between Cromwell and Toussaint and depict them as
Dylan, Dauenhauer Corporal Serrano 2 October 2017 The Importance of Following Orders What is the importance of following orders? Following orders is what allows the military to operate in an organized and effective manner during important and challenging situations. Following orders ensures that everyone is in alignment with others and builds discipline by making a cohesive plan of instructions that ties everyone as one unit.
He tells the colonists that the British Parliament usually responds to the “gracious reception of [their] petition comforts with [] war-like preparations.” Henry contrasts the colonists’ petition to the British’s warmongering. Henry’s antithesis makes the colonists recognize the difference between their polite approach and the British's aggressive response. Therefore, he gives the colonists more reasons to question the negative actions being enacted by the British. He highlights Britain’s inability to compromise since they respond to any threats with violence.
Oliver Cromwell was one of the main commanders leading the Parliamentarian forces against the Royalist forces during the English Civil War (22 August 1642 – 3 September 1651). He started his career as a lowly cavalry troop commander but through his tactical prowess, he was able to rise through the ranks until he became the commander of the New Model Army. At the Battle of Naseby, Cromwell led his wing with remarkable skill, routing the Royalist cavaliers and helping to thoroughly smash the remains of the Royalist army which led to their eventual surrender at Oxford in June of 1646. Following several other smaller conflicts including the Second English Civil War and the Irish and Scottish Campaigns, Cromwell was appointed the position of
¨Patrick Henry Speech¨ : Rhetorical Use In his speech to the Virginia Congress, Patrick Henry uses rhetorical devices such as an extended metaphor and hyperbole to contribute to his purpose of coercing the other delegates to accept the upcoming conflict with Britain. In his address to the Virginia Congress, Henry establishes the urgency of preparing for the inevitable war with the British. In his speech, Henry uses a ‘storm’ to symbolize the conflict that is on the horizon.
How The Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland’s Heroic Role from the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe The author Thomas Cahill was in 1940 in New York City and had Irish-American parents that raised him in Queens and the Bronx. He is said to be a lifelong scholar by the Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau. He studied ancient Greek and Latin literature as well as medieval philosophy, scripture, and theology at Fordham University where he completed his Bachelor of Arts degree.
The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and
Yong June Jung Ms. Foster British Literature 24 January 2016 Who is the intended audience of “A Modest Proposal” and why? A Modest Proposal, is a satire literature essay written by Jonathan Swift, mourns the sad destiny of Irish individuals who are confronting issues of desperation and neediness by confusing the readers. The author uses confusing words and descriptions to make the reader think that the intended audience is Irish people.
“Cathleen Ni Houlihan”, a play that William Butler Yeats co-wrote with Lady Gregory, in 1902, is about Ireland’s fight for their independence. According to Nicholas Grene: “What is at issue [in Kathleen Ni Houlihan] is the political meaning which the play generated and the potential for such meaning which the text offered.” (Grene, 1999) The play is set in a cottage kitchen and centres in the 1798 Rebellion. The play: “stages two conflicting narratives of Irish peasant womanhood. Mrs. Gillane and, potentially, Delia, her son’s pretty, well-dowered bride-to-be, represent a realist, maternal order, the values of hearth and home; the Poor Old Woman, Cathleen, also dressed as a peasant, represents a contrary order of being – symbolic, nomadic, virginal, sacrificial rather than procreative (…)