Are major sporting events like the Olympic Games a waste of money? Are the Olympic Games a waste of money? The Olympic Games are an international event where athletes from every country come together to compete. Many fans and spectators attend this event to cheer for their country. The number of spectators keeps on increasing every four years as the event gets more popular. As this is an international event the cost of hosting it is huge. For instance, the total output of the 1976 Montreal Games was $1.48 billion whilst the 2012 London Games was an insurmountable $14.6 billion. Stadiums are built for different disciplines, and national representatives are invited to perform in the opening and closing ceremony, As a result the stadiums need a high level of security. In this essay I will be debating about the benefits and consequences of the Olympic Games. The three main points which will be covered are; where the hosting country receives the money from, whom it will benefit, and what it does to the country. …show more content…
One could say it’s from the public while others says it’s from sponsors. According to “The Guardian” both of these statements are correct. In the 2012 London Games the money came from the central government (which involves taxes paid by the population and organizations), sponsorships from around the world, national lottery, the International Olympic Community, and TV broadcast rights. Hence it is understandable that the population is questioning, whether the taxes paid are used in an economic matter, because if it is not used economically, then clearly it would be a waste of
This week’s article, “Six Lies about the Marlins Stadiums,” by Elfrink unveils that the Marlins stadium used the taxpayers’ money unwisely. Simply maintaining this stadium costs more than what the Marlins stadium brings in. Thus, the Marlins Stadium has a low gross income, which is very problematic for the taxpayers, since they might be a certain way of using their money for that. According to Jordan Rappaport and Chad Wilkerson in the article, “What Are the Benefits of Hosting a Major League Sports Franchise?”
In addition, government will be responsible for legacies maintenance. As the partnership with private sectors is an important component for hosting Olympic Games, international and national, commercial and non-commercial companies and organizations will be involved in legacies development as well. Therefore, they will assist in achieving legacy goals through conducting marketing campaigns, providing financial investment and maintaining
Host cities rake in money from eager fans, teams and conferences make money from profit made on the tournament, and because the tournament has a limited supply of resources, prices skyrocket. There are many ways that the NCAA generates revenue. Although the biggest way is through selling the the broadcast rights to television companies, ticket and appeal sales also play a role. Because the NCAA is a non-profit organization, ninety six percent of this close to $900 million the NCAA will make goes straight back to the basketball organizations. The money is given to each participating conference and the NCAA urges the conferences to distributed the money to each team in the conference.
Doc 9 shows how in 2002 the Pakistani team is bringing shame to Pakistan because they are not honouring the government and how the teams in the past did. One other document that would be useful to gain more insight into the money part of the olympics is to see a document showing the cost of an olympic game and how it varies per country or
“The figure they are using for Tokyo is about $15 billion” (Document B) The clear cost of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics is a great example of the cost. The sheer amount of money that is needed to run the games can be damaging to an economy. This money could cause taxes to rise, or could be diverting money from other services. This cost is coupled with the cost of postponing, “And another thing that’s there, by the way, is the $3 billion that it costs them to postpone.”
The Olympics almost always cause negative economic effects for cities. Although cities expect to earn revenue through the Olympics, not many cities generate a substantial amount of revenue. Los Angeles, the host city of the 1984 Olympics, is a rare example of a city profiting from the Olympics: “Los Angeles actually profited by $100 million from the 1984 Summer Olympics mostly by using existing stadiums” (Perryman 17). That city did generate money, but cities
Should college athletes be paid, or should they just be happy with the scholarship they are given? In the article “Why College Athletes Should Be Paid”, the author Tyson Hartnett claims that college athletes deserve to be paid. In the article, he states, “A $25,000 scholarship may seem like a lot of money, but it really only covers the basics” (Hartnett par. 5). Hartnett feels that college athletes deserve a salary because they are “typically dead broke” (Hartnett par. 9), even though they bring lots of attention and money to their schools.
For instance, if sports leagues got rid of participation trophies they could save money and buy better safety equipment. According to an article in the New York Times, an Oklahoma Little league had to drop participation trophies because of budget problems. Did you know that three billion dollars are spent on participation trophies each year! If we stopped wasting our money on these pointless
"Running, long jump, shot put, javelin, discus, and equestrian competitions" are some of the many Olympic sports played many centuries ago. While these sports were made for entertainment purposes, they were also helpful for ancient civilizations. The Games had a religious and political significance and helped Greek historians and writers to keep track of time. These games were very important to history and to this very day The Olympics were held in honor of the Greek gods.
similarly, document 7 describes that countries that sponsored the Seoul Olympics of 1988 such as united states and Japan have made tremendous profits, on the other hand, Korean corporations have “failed to avail itself of an opportunity to display its industrial and economic power to a worldwide television” by not sponsoring the Olympics. According to the international Olympic committee statistics, there was also an increase in the economic participation of different nations to pay to the international Olympic committee for international tv and radio broadcast rights. This demonstrated the willingness of countries to contribute to the Olympic games because it benefited them(doc
Getting Paid to Play a Sport in College? College athletes have been playing inter-collegiate sports without pay since 1852 there is no reason to change that now. College athletes should not get paid because the previous college athletes did not get paid, the grind without pay makes you a better person and teaches you not to take anything for granted, and teaches you not to expect an award for everything good you do in life. College athletes should not get paid based on the simple fact that it would be detrimental to college athletics and why they are played.
draw in a big crowd which also brings in more money that people pay to watch. When asked, former NBA player and Hall Of Famer, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar said “It’s a $6 billion a year industry. Last year, CBS and TBS split up a $1 billion just off of March Madness.” In the NBA the average amount of money signed to a player in a contract is at least 5.15 million dollars. With so much money being made these athletes are getting none of this.
The money that can go towards better causes such as donating to the homeless, donating to charities, helping people, etc goes to people playing a game. Do you think that watching a game is more important than helping people that are in poverty? I didn’t think so. Also, athletes didn’t get paid this much before now, In fact, “Athletes were not always paid more than CEOs.
Government spending and expenditure The modern Olympic Games, especially in present times, have been extremely costly. The London 2012 Summer Olympics cost a total of $15 billion (Vaccaro, 2015), the Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics costed at least $40 billion (Riley, 2015), and the Sochi Winter Olympics totaled $55 billion, around four times the amount proposed at the time of bidding at $12.5 billion (Muller, 2014). Most of this money went into development of infrastructure, and building of sports
To gain a better understanding of how the Olympic and Paralympic games affect and are affected by the host nation I am going to compare and contrast the London games to the 2008 Chinese games and the upcoming Brazilian games.