Ryan came to school on 08/26/15 with bruises and scratches on his face area. There is a 1 ½ inch scrap on Ryan’s arm, blue and green bruises on both sides of his cheeks, and a bruise on the left side of his face. Ryan’s scratches are not bleeding and there is not any open skin; Ryan doesn’t require any medical care or treatment. Ryan’s mother’s boyfriend hit the child with his fist because he wants to toughen him up. Ms. Arnold was present when the abuse occurred and did nothing to stop the abuse; Ms. Arnold gave Ryan make-up to cover his bruises. Ryan has not missed any school because of the incident and was able to hide the bruises on 08/25/15 by covering his face with his hand and a hoodie all day; the bruises were not noticed by Ryan’s
On 11/07/2017, the agent received a Law Enforcement Contact form indicating offender Joe A. Slugger was at the K&D Tap on 11/06/2017 having unauthorized contact with Sandra Williams. It was stated in the LEC form that Joe Slugger was drinking alcohol and will be referred for the charge of felony Substantial Battery by Badger Police Department after he was witnessed to hit Sandra Williams with his open right hand to Sandra William’s left side of her face and then grab Sandra Williams by the back of her head and slamming her head onto the bar counter where she was seated. Sandra Williams was observed having a visible red mark on her face and a laceration on her forehead that later required eight stitches. On 11/08/2017, the agent received a police report from Badger Police Department Officer Konkol (Case number 1-98-00456723) stating Officer Konkol and Officer Sandner were dispatched to the K&D Tap (223 W. main Street, Badger WI) where they made contact with Joe Slugger.
On December 22, 1978, the plaintiff’s, Mark Congini’s parents, son was injured in a car collision while he was driving home intoxicated. Mark Congini was driving home from his employee, Portersville Valve Company, Christmas party where Congini was served alcoholic beverages at the party leading him to the point of intoxication. When he requested for his keys, though the company’s agent who Mark requested the keys from knew he was intoxicated, they were given to him with full knowledge that Mark had the intent to drive home from the party. Congini was eighteen years of age at this time and his injuries consisted of numerous fractures in addition to brain damage leaving him entirely disabled for the remainder of his life. The defendant in this
Suspect Pedersen was identified by her own admission. The victim has been recovering from a recent surgery for an aneurysm. Suspect Pedersen hit the victim across the head with a two liter bottle of soda, which was two thirds full. The victim became light headed and the assault caused her wound to open and began bleeding. The victim was transported to Huntington Memorial Hospital for her injuries.
On 04/14/17, at 4:30pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to the area of Carnation Drive and Blue Bonnett Drive on an injury-possible dangerous or vicious dog to a minor. I arrived at the location and was met by dog owner Christine Belcher and Blendon Township Police Department (BTPD) Detective Sergeant E. Moynihan. I asked what happen, Ms. Belcher stated that her daughter Daisha Decree were walking their Rottweiler name Bolt when victim Victor Schuetz asked to pet the dog, Ms. Decree give permission. Mr. V Schuetz started petting Bolt on the underside of his neck and move to the top of his head where he was bit.
The trial that was held two days ago included an innocent man, Mr. Tom Robinson, being tried in court for rape and abuse. Miss Mayella was badly beaten on the right side of her face. For Mr. Robinson to beat Ms. Ewell on the right side of her face it would require him using his left hand. When Tom was a boy, he got his arm caught in a cotton gin while working for Mr. Dolphin Raymond. When his arm got caught in the gin, it made his left arm twelve inches shorter than his right.
3d 4 (2012), it states that the elements of a prima facie case for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. Browning’s actions were examples of extreme and outrageous conduct with the intent of causing emotional distress as they directly called La Pierre names and followed her for blocks. The doctors have diagnosed LaPierre with severe trauma after the incident which meets the second element, and finally, La Pierre would not have suffered any trauma if it were not for Browning inflicting severe emotional distress towards her which means his conduct is the actual and proximate cause of her
Plaintiff states that MOS kicked his legs causing plaintiff to fell on his face into a puddle of urine, rock salt, and gravel. Plaintiff states that he was taken to hospital for treatment. Plaintiff accepted an
Case Identification: DONNA BUSHONG and GARY BUSHONG, (Parents of JONATHAN BUSHONG)Appellants-Plaintiffs vs. DAVID WILLIAMSON Appellee-Defendant. No. 54A01-0103-CV-100 Facts: David Williamson was a P.E. teacher for the South Montgomery School Corporation (School) in New Market, Indiana. On March 20, 1998, he was involved in an incident with two students in his physical education class. While playing kickball with his fifth grade physical education class, he tagged Jonathan Bushong out.
Peter Plaintiff was dressed in very dark attire and wearing a black baseball cap. Peter Plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk of this dark street and texting at the same time. Without looking up from his phone Peter Plaintiff stepped off of the sidewalk, into the bike path, with the intentions of crossing the street. Peter Plaintiff, also a student at UCSB, knows how many people bike in Isla Vista on a daily basis. Peter Plaintiff was not paying attention when he stepped into the bike path and Jack was unable to avoid the collision at that point.
On September 4th, an injury happened to the child (Jesslynn). There was word that the mom and dad were fighting. All the kids were there when the parents were fighting. The mom threw a plate at the dad. The mom missed and stuck the child (Jesslynn) in the forehead.
On Wednesday May 13, 2014 a 6 year old kindergarten, Ian, was grabbed by his teacher. Not only was he picked up, but Ian’s mother states that there was a bruise on the back of his head. Video evidence shows the young kindergartner trapped between a wall and a furious teacher. We are not quite sure what Barb WIlliam’s motive was. Possibly the mental stress and the pressure the end of the school year, or possibly the fact that it was the middle of the week.
Hello. I have a concern in regards to an ongoing situation that includes a specific incident today. Today on the playground during lunch recess Jacoby was pushed and his face hit something, sounds like it may have been another boy's head. Jacoby's cheekbone is bruised up and so is around the top of his left eye's orbital bone.
In this case the youth should be tried as adults because of the severity of the incident and the emotional and physical effect that it had on the victim
Since Richard was only sixteen years when the incident occurred. At this age, adolescents are still developing their cognitive and emotional skills, and charging them as adults may not be appropriate. The justice system should take into account their age and consider the possibility of rehabilitation, rather than punitive measures. Furthermore, Richard had no previous incidents this severe, and it would be unfair to judge him based on one mistake he made as a teenager. Slater further informs us about how when you are young your brain is still developing and during that time your body is
You Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.