Modern warfare is a multifaceted adventure that is successful by a combination of forces working in unison to achieve a common mission. The Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP) is a critical element that is established through all levels. It encompasses a large range of military operations, which includes other military forces (Navy, Marines, Air Force, etc.) and allies to the United States. Within this planning process, course of actions (COA’s) are developed, analyzed then checked against alternate COA’s to produce the order or plan. During the planning process, using multiple U.S. forces or other national forces, Unity of Command must be established, especially at the tactical and operational levels. Operation Anaconda is a modern-day …show more content…
When the dust cleared, what we found was an overall victory for Joint Forces and the first major blow to Al-Qaeda. “Eight U.S. Troops lost their lives in Operation Anaconda and 82 were wounded. Few parts of the battle went as planned, but the effect was devastating to Al-Qaeda. Estimates are about 200 enemy killed, and double that number fled over the border to Pakistan.” (Lambert) Prior to Operation Anaconda mission were small and ran by the Special Operations Forces (SOF). Operation Anaconda was the first major victory for the Joint Operation Forces (JOF) in the Afghan …show more content…
Operational intelligence is one of the most important allies we have to defeat the enemy. Intelligence needs to be gather, analyzed and reanalyzed. The accuracy of intelligence plays a pivotal role in the success of the mission. The intelligence gather in support of Operation Anaconda, although analyzed was not accurate. Intelligence reports projected 50 to 200 Al-Qaeda fighters with small arms to be encountered. When the attach began, US troops encountered nearly 10 times as many Al-Qaeda fighters dug into fortified positions and heavily
The ROMO looks at a wide variety military operations that ranges from security cooperation, crisis response, and major operations and campaigns. Operational reach is the distance that a military force can employ their military capabilities into combat operation. The majority U.S. Army forces will have to conduct Reception, Staging, Onward movement, and Integration operations before a major operation. The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy operational reach extended further than the U.S. Army. It was important to understand the capabilities of our Sisters Services and Special Operation Forces.
On July 30, 2008, a bloody battle involving Coalition forces took place in the mountainous eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. This was the Battle of Wanat and the devastating amount of Coalition casualties began a vigorous investigation by the United States Army. The village of Wanat, defended by Second Platoon, Chosen Company, Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team would fall victim to numerous bad decision made by higher command. Although the men of Chosen Company fought hard, they ended up surrounded, vastly outnumbered, and without any Battalion assets. This paper will argue the reasons for the disastrous outcome of the Battle of Wanat; examining the effective company leadership exploiting effective
Analyzing the mission command principles and the commanding officer’s actions will also be discussed. Specifically, as it relates to building a cohesive team through mutual trust, providing a clear commander’s intent, and accepting prudent risk. While the battle of Fort Riviere and the resulting occupation of Haiti occurred over a century ago, it provides us with an example of American foreign policy during this period and bares resemblance to future American military
This battle, which lasted for two weeks and involved US and Afghan forces engaging with members of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, is seen as a turning point in the war, with the US-led coalition ultimately driving the enemy forces out of the valley (Kugler, 2007). The battle was significant in that it demonstrated the effectiveness of US-led coalition forces in a mountainous terrain and against a determined enemy. The coalition forces employed air strikes and ground troops to drive out the enemy, and the success of this strategy was evident in the outcome of the battle. Furthermore, Operation Anaconda demonstrated the importance of collaboration between US and Afghan forces, with the latter playing an important role in the battle. The battle also highlighted the need for US and Afghan forces to carefully consider the terrain and environment when engaging with the enemy.
This complicated any effort to bring massive of amounts of fire power without causing numerous unintended civilian casualties. Because of the possibility of the high number civilian casualties a close air support effort was considered unnecessary due to the lack of enemy personnel in this area. The plan for Operation Anaconda employed many of the same concepts that were successful in earlier experiences in Afghanistan. The battle was planned to be mainly a ground operation, although the task force did plan for a limited number of strikes by fighters and bombers just before the U.S. ground forces were supposed to enter the valley.
Therefore, he dispatched his 2nd Brigade Commander, Colonel Anderson, to gather as much information as possible, assess the situation, then report back describing the conditions in order for Major General Petraeus to lead, and direct his units in Mosul. This paper explores the aspects he used to lead, direct, and assess the 101st Airborne Division in Mosul. Moreover, how General Petraeus was able to utilize artful
The adopted standard joint force concept of operations during Operation Anaconda was not used. Operation Anaconda had multiple commands instead of having one unified command structure. The Command Structure of Operation Anaconda
Direct Mission Command Introduction General David Petraeus utilized prudent risk to combat the enemies in Iraq through the mission command process. He led soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division from Fort Campbell, Kentucky into Kuwait, with further onward movement to Iraq. The division had minimal knowledge on what to expect in a foreign country. General Petraeus knew that he would need assistance from his staff as well as the elements of combat power. The six-warfighting functions that empowered General Petraeus to remain agile and adaptive during his operations in Iraq were mission command, movement and maneuver, intelligence, fires, sustainment, and protection (ADRP6-0, 2012).
Even with great loss of live for the Allies on Juno beach, the Canadian’s were still able to take the beach and pave a way for more troops to be
In March 2002, the infamous first extensive Army combat operation during Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Anaconda took place. Operation Anaconda initially was planned as a light combat mission to occur over the course of three-days with the intent of finally locating and defeating the enemy (Taliban and al Qaeda forces). However, as the operation was set into motion planning and execution issues began to arise, and last-minute adjustments had to be made (Headquarters, Dept. of the Army , 2012). The mission that was expected to last for a total of three days turned into a triumphant yet intense seven-day battle despite the numerous downfalls and was officially declared complete seventeen days from the from the beginning of the battle (March
As planners work at increasingly higher levels of responsibility including at a geographic Combatant Command the last criteria becomes the hardest
outpost base was taken over and raided by heavy taliban forces. It was in the middle of they day when the Taliban surprised attacked the U.S. outpost. The Taliban were firing everything they had at the outpost. One man who had survived the attack said “We were never shot at within 2 weeks. So we knew the next time they hit us it’s going to be hard.”
Fourteen soldiers from The U.S. forces were killed in action between August 1st and August 15th of 1993. The U.S. mourned for the losses. Moreover, the American public could not handle these losses mostly after the successful missions in “Operation Desert Storm” and “Operation Desert Shield.” The American people demanded revenge which led to the activation of Task Force Ranger in late August of 1993. The Task Force Ranger consisted of about four hundred and forty special forces including Soldiers, Seamen, and Airmen.
By definition, “mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations,” according to ADRP 5-0. Mission command is about knowing when to change the task to fit the purpose. This paper is intended to analyze the mission command of one side of the battle, focusing on the commander’s role in the operations process. The Battle of Bunker Hill was the most important battle of the American Revolution because of Colonel Prescott’s superior command and control.
These aspects of equipment and record keeping also affect the functional planning of the U.S. Army. Using a wartime scenario, a Commanding Officer needs to know precisely the amount of equipment on hand, including weapons and ammunition, in order to properly plan an operation. Proper planning, in this sense, ensures that the operation is conducted sufficiently and no lives are