Opinion Essay
Answer the following questions in well-organized answers. These questions want your opinion about the Canadian economy, and while there are no right or wrong answers, you will be graded on how thoughtful and clear your answers are. Your task, after answering them, is to take your responses for each of these questions and turn them into an essay; this will involve some planning on your part in order to make these five questions into one cohesive essay. Your essay will be marked using the rubric at the end of this assignment.
1. In your opinion, what is the most important economic problem facing Canada today? In other words, the one that concerns you the most? Why is this case?
The most important economic problem in Canada is the
…show more content…
Justin Trudeau has been newly elected as the Prime Minister of Canada with his Liberal party. Unlike the former Conservative party, the Liberals are more radical, therefore the results of their actions taken to solve the economic problems will be hard to predict. With the Conservative party, it would take small steps in solving problems, therefore whether the results are successful or not, they would be mild and can be accepted more easily by the government and the people. But with the radical Liberal party, the results will likely be extreme. The Liberal party reduces the annual contribution limit of TFSAs from $10,000 back to $5,500, the reason for this reduction is that it wants to encourage people to spend more money into the market to fight the lack of money circulation in the society which resulted from the downfall of the economy. The Liberal party also accepts huge amounts of refugees which stimulate the anger of many Canadians. The Canadian economy is at its recession now, many local people are still struggling while the government announces that they are going to spend a huge amount of money in improving lives for foreign people. The money could have been used to help ourselves to boost our economy but the government does not seem to be concerned about our own …show more content…
First of all, Canada and the United States are two independent countries, they each have their own unique and fully developed system. The people in Canada and the United States would likely be resistant to the merging as well. More importantly, to think in an economic perspective, the biggest reason for not joining the United States is that Canada and the United States have very different ways of handling money, in terms of spending. Before the election of the new Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, Canada was led by the Conservative Party under Stephen Harper. So Canada and its people are still fairly conservative. Canada do not borrow a huge amount of money from foreign countries, and therefore do not have a huge amount of debts. It wants people to save some money for future uses. However, the United States has the opposite idea. The United States borrows heavily from other countries and has heavy debts. It encourages people to spend money, and in some senses, spend “future money”—the idea that is similar to using a credit card: buy first, pay later. If Canada and the United States are joined together, this difference would not only create disorders in the functioning of the economic system, but also result in separations between citizens with different views in the ways of spending money. In this case, Canadians and Americans would not be able to accept each other anyway, even though the two
The article “The Liberals’ taxing policies: What they will mean to you and when” by Jamie Golombek, basically summarizes some aspects of the taxing policies campaigned by the liberals in the 2015 election. This article talks about how the liberal party, if elected, plan to cut the tax rate for the middle income tax bracket best known as the middle class. The party plans to cut the tax rate from the current 22% to 20.5% for Canadians with taxable annual income between $44 700- $89 400.To make of for this middle class tax cut, the party also plans to increse the tax rate from 29% to 33% for the wealthiest one percent of Canada who have an anual income of over $200 00. The liberal party also intends to cancel income splitting due to how it does
While Laurier argued that Canada could complete effectively compete against the United States, popular opinion in either eastern or western Canada was not supportive of entering into free trade with the United States and its larger industrial capacity. As a result support for the Liberals was not as strong as what the Liberals might expect due to the fact that for many Western Canadians the fear of being assimilated into, or overrun by, the greater American population and America's greater industrial base was greater than potentially seeing some economic benefit offered from either reciprocity or a Commercial Union or free trade in any format. According to Baker this played into the Conservatives' hands due to the Liberals' making this the election's central issue because it formed a stark contrast between the Liberals and the Conservatives. The Liberal policy made many Canadians anxious about their political, social and economic futures while the Conservatives offered a clear alternative through allowing Canadians to stay on the same economic policy, and by extension guaranteeing the social and political futures of those who were concerned about the Liberal policy which turned out to be the sizeable majority of the Canadian
Stephen Harper Essay Rough Draft Stephen Harper positively change Canada many ways. Harper cut GST from 7% to 5% over the course of his terms. Harbour conducted many free-trade agreements especially with the European Union Union. Launching consultations for the Canada job grant which would help ensure that Canadians are able to to obtain skills and qualities that are needed to get jobs in high demand fields. What Harpers cut taxes for many Canadians.
By becoming a member of Confederation, Ontario will have access to the facilities and resources of the entire country, enabling them to grow into the West and integrate themselves into the
From 1867 to today, Canada has had twenty-three prime ministers, each of whom helped build and improve Canada. An analysis of former prime ministers William Lyon Mackenzie King, Lester Bowles Pearson, and Pierre Elliott Trudeau of Canada during the WWII, the fifties and sixties, and contemporary Canada, respectively, shows that Canadians should be proud of their nation and the people who led and shaped Canada to what it is today. During WWII, the leader seen as the greatest Canadian prime minister by scholars and academics in Maclean’s surveys guided Canada through the turbulent time. William Lyon Mackenzie King made many accomplishments during his time as the longest-serving prime minister, from 1921-1926, 1926-1930, and 1935-1948, and
He also does an excellent job in discussing and analyzing how the two separate views lead to two separate and distinct end goals, which gives the reader an in depth ability to truly understand the complexity of the situation, and the bottleneck that it places on federal-provincial institutions. Although there are multiple points of agreement with the author's argument, there are also points of disagreement, for example he is arguing that both sides of the argument do not allow for people to make a normative judgement on the issues at hand, but downplays the problem as a whole by stating that Canadian citizens only care about policy outcomes, and not whether or not federal-provincial conflict can be balanced. In order to be more efficient in problem solving, as well as incorporate a wider range of potential solutions, the betterment of federal-provincial institutions should be made a pressing issue, and not downplayed
The development in Canada are between the understandings of Europe and the United States.
He states that the Canada’s current economy unfairly treats the middle and working classes, as they work more than before and yet make less . Since Harper is the Prime Minister it is then his fault. Thus, Trudeau has us feel anger towards Harper, as the failed economy is due to Harper. How effective was this appeal.
“ Their policies [ the Conservative party’s] appeared confused and impractical. “ (Fellows and Wells, 2013). This is perhaps most appearant in Diefenbaker’s ambitions to make Canada less dependent on the U.S. economically. Diefenbaker announced an ambitious plan that would allow Canada to move 15% of it’s trade from the U.S. to Britain. Ideally the plan addresses the growing discomfort that Canadian citizens had with the U.S.’s increasing role in their country.
70% of Canadians claim to have done a favor for their neighbor. Over 50% of Canadians believe that most of their fellow citizens can be trusted (Turcotte). And it’s no surprise because Canada has a certain reputation: it is harmless, void of all the unkindness that has claimed the United States since its creation.
Quebec also has a major divide in the nation, which is also a pressing issue. Some Quebecois want to be remain in Canada, but others want their own sovereignty, separate from Canada.
Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.
Historically, the United States influenced Canadian development as new technology became available to the citizens of both countries. Radios became available for anyone to own in the 1920’s. The signals carried for long distances, and a number of American stations could easily be received in
The provincial and federal governments heavily tax the Canadians’ revenue, interest earned on savings, and dividends in order to raise tax revenues to maintain their governments. Saving is the source of the supply of loanable funds (178); when the interest rates are high, people have higher incentives to save more money because of the high return on their investments and save less when the return on their savings is not very attractive (182). Because of government tax regulations in Canada that tax the returns on investments so heavily, savings become less attractive for Canadians; in consequence, Canadian spending habits increases in areas that do not totally support the overall economic well beings of the nation. (Chapter
For a long time the debates had been going about how was the better prime minister of Canada. On the the top of most lists of best prime ministers are Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald. For example, according to the Expert Survey that was made in 2013 “Laurier came first, Macdonald second, and King third, but the difference in their overall scores was negligible”. Both prime ministers had a strong vision of the country that helped shaped Canada to become the country it is today(in 2015). Thesis: Sir John A.Macdonald was one of the founding fathers, but William Lyon Mackenzie King had to lead the country through the part of Depression and WWII, and they both have made different positive contributions to Canada and are highly respected