Ordinary Law Abiding Citizens Analysis

627 Words3 Pages
Attention ! I am a criminal who likes to break the law. Yes indeed, I have jaywalked, and I have played music out loud at home past the provisioned time of acceptance. Notably, I have never stolen from anyone, killed anyone or any entity, and have never been arrested for public indecency. Yet, I am a criminal. Well, in the legal sense. In his passage, Frank Trippett remarks against the rise of, “ ordinary law-abiding citizens” who take to “skirting the law.” Under Tippett 's statements, I am a just a plain criminal. Trippett explains that it is apparent that millions of Americans are becoming more lenient with breaking the law, in cases where is at utmost convenient for them. Trippett establishes his perspective of these anti-law abiding citizens by saying; “When it comes to tax codes, or laws against littering or speeding or noise pollution, more and more ordinary people become scofflaws.” Trippett’s theory on the bust of our societal foundation and structure is the most perceptible aspect of information in his stance on the deteriorating strength of constructional law that is expressed in his passage. Trippett carefully exposes the source of this phenonem, it’s actually those who blame the failing reigns of law-and-order by the violence of others, and yet choose to break the law then most convenient to them.…show more content…
Trippett explains; “ the foundations of social order are more profoundly shaken when ordinary law-abiding citizens take to skirting the law.” Trippett punctuates his stance by stating that the ‘minor ‘ laws we come to break are placed upon us for a reason, to nourish
Open Document