Organic crops contain no GMOs and organic meat comes from animals is fed with GMO-free or organic feed. Organic practices also protect animal cruelty as they are not given antibiotics, growth hormones, or fed animal by-products. This is beneficial to the consumers as the use of antibiotics in conventional meat creates antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, which means that the person will be less responsive to antibiotic treatment, and it also reduces the risk of mad cow disease. Organic farming is also better for the environment as it reduces the pollution in the air, water and soil and water is conserved. They also use less energy, increase soil fertility and reduce soil
According to a State of Science Review done in 2008, organic food is more nutritious than inorganic as there are no chemicals or additives going into your body. This means less risk of disease and illness and overall better health, which will be cheaper in the long run as you will save money on health care costs. People with illnesses like Cancer and diabetes, claim that there is a definite improvement in their health after changing their diet to organic
With the many advantages and disadvantages, which is better; GMO or Organic Food? Genetically modified organisms as we know it today is considered to have only negatives, but GMOs actually contain many positives. Such properties with crops like the conservervation of land and water resources are all possible because of genetic modifications. Crops today can be engineered to produce higher harvests from the same croplands. In some cases, the crop can double its production when the transition from traditional crops to GMO crops is completed by local farmers.
Rhetorical Analysis: Organic Farming In his article, “Organic Farming Healthier, More Efficient than Status Quo”, Anurag Muthyam, argues organic farming is a better farming method than conventional farming. He does so by first asking the audience where their food comes from drawing their interest into the topic. Throughout the article, Muthyam tells his audience about the potential good that can arise with choosing organic farming over conventional farming. Muthyam also explains the general concept of what is organic farming in the third paragraph after hooking the audience by telling them where their food comes from and how it is produced. After introducing the concept of organic farming, the author goes on to compare and contrast organic farming versus conventional farming.
Buying organic food can be sometimes expensive but at Trader Joe 's promises that their price is reasonable than other organic markets. So what’s Trader Joe 's Mission, Value and Vision? In this paper I will compare Trader Joe 's mission, value and vision against the criteria of robust statements. I will also discuss Trader Joe 's core
What is also speaking for consumption of organic food is the fact that this kind of foods does not contain genetically modified organisms, which is nowadays an important concern for many people who would like to stay healthy for longer. The organic food appeared as a result of Green
The advantages include a decrease in food prices. This is because crops will be easier, more advanced and less costly to produce therefore decreasing the cost of the final product. It is more economically efficient as it does not require pesticides or other costly enhancements therefore saving on production cost of the crops and because of this and added factors such as not producing poor quality or failure of crops; it allows for farmers to generate greater profits. Crops can be altered to withstand different environments and climates which mean crops can be grown worldwide and this in turn means more production which results in lower costs and more food to go around. These genetically
However, we must learn to combine the benefits of both and fix the fix the hole we dug ourselves. Despite casing groundwater depletion, monocropping, and costing too much money, GMO farming is an efficient way to produce crops on a massive scale. Organic farming may be more susceptible to diseases and pest damage, but it is cheap and healthy which allows poor farmers to grow subsistence crops. It is hard to determine which type of farming is a better way of agriculture. Nonetheless, it is not hard to see the negative effects on the world that both types of agriculture leave.
In 1945 a strange push towards an economically friendly diet, by G. Stigler in “The Cost of Subsistence”, made waves in agricultural and economic studies.” Now we see a push towards economic and environmental conscientious diets. Food scientists are examining questions of what common diet is best for a majority to adopt to aid the earth; however, there is also a struggle to understand if there is a common diet to best serve the population. Other notions to consider are, economic stress people may face to adopt an environmentally appropriate diet, and the ways to fit both needs. A third opinion to consider is the true need to adopt an environmentally
Knowing that: farmers are being manipulated; fast food is being supported by the government and consumers always have the choice of living healthy people need to take a decision that will change their life. What consumers do not realize is that they pay a small price for this unhealthy food now and will end up paying with the price of their own lives later. This is no longer an issue of cost as eventually people who suffer from sickness or disease may end up spending more. Furthermore, there is no price tag to living a healthy