The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events. This act prematurely pushed Osage Indians from their land by encroaching white settlers and it had a very negative effect on them. Which is why I believe Osage Tribe would have never been in favor of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. …show more content…
(Louis F. Burns, 2004). The Osage Indians are a seminomadic tribe. They were known for their hunting, gardening and foraging (Louis F. Burns, 2004). They would hunt buffalo, deer, rabbit and other wild animals in the central and eastern parts of their domain (James O. Dorsey, 1888). While the men of the Osage tribe were responsible for the hunting, the women were known to butcher and prepare the meat by drying or smoking methods and they also gathered and grew plants in that area (Burns, L. F, 2004). Seeing as The Kansas-Nebraska Act did reduce the size of their territory and also lead to the arrival of white settlers on their land. It was the epidemic that cost them the most. The size of their tribe declined from 8000 in 1850 to 3500 in 1860 (Robertson R. G,
Indians were removed from their homeland and killed. This was directly attributed to the Lewis and Clark expedition which spurred the movement. Although it most likely was not the intentions of the group, their effects on Westward Expansion was the beginning to an end for Native Americans, and has left impressions on history that are still present
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union
It opened the path for many court cases to reserve space for the Native Americans and created a tension between the Native Americans who did
People in the North wanted the land to be open to Americans to farm and to live. People in the South wanted the land for themselves to expand their slave dominion. Neither the North nor the South worry or think about the Indian lands that would cross paths with them. The Indians were either forced up into the Dakotas or they were forced down into Oklahoma. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was then passed, but Stephen Douglas, who was the man responsible for the act, was deeply criticized.
The act almost cost the natives to lose the 44 acres of land, but the native people were getting Amendments from the ANCSA to protect the land. In the end, the United States started as mean people because Alaskan natives were new to them, but then they started to give them
By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi.
Prior to the 20th Century, the United States of America had yet to become a well-established global power; the United States was undergoing major developments in technology, refinement and overhaul of governing policies, and development of urban centers. In addition to the previously mentioned developments in the United States, there were various new job opportunities, as a result of the rapid urbanization and the need to develop infrastructure, and cheap land offered by the US Government enticed individuals to move from the East Coast and head westwards in hopes of prosperity. Conflict between the free states and the slave states had resulted in an additional increased demand for the settling and statehood of sections of the territories west of the Mississippi River. It would be this conflict for land expansion that would lead to the historical event known as Bleeding Kansas, wherein conflict between activists from both the free and slave states would be so violent that it resulted in a total of more than
Most officials believed that the federal government should persuade or force the Plains Indians to surrender most of their land and to exchange their religion, communal property, nomadic way of life, and gender relations for Christian worship, private ownership, and small farming on reservations. in 1887the Dawes Act broke up the land of nearly all tribes into small parcels to be distributed to Indian families, with the remainder auctioned off to American buyers. Indians who accepted the farms and adopted the habits of civilized life would become full-fledged American citizens. The policy proved to be a disaster, leading to the loss of much tribal land and the erosion of Indian cultural traditions. Americans, however, benefited greatly.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The Kansas-Nebraska let to Bleeding Kansas. Monroe Doctrine 1823 which created separate spheres of European and American influence.
Conflict with the Courts falls under the AP theme: Politics and Power. Madison’s midnight appointed judges did not have the chance to be given their commission letters and future judge Marbury called upon the Supreme Court to force Secretary Madison to give over his commission. Their legendary decision to not force an executive official to act was a win for the current administration because it kept more Federalists from gaining power in the judiciary system. Their overturning of Congress’s Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional was of more significance than their lack of action in commanding Madison to deliver letters. The Supreme Court overturning the Judiciary Act was caused by their realization that the judiciary branch should not have
It also took away the tribal ownership of most tribes. The act moved Indian families onto their own land, and took away Indian children away from their families and sent them to boarding
Thousands of Indians were killed by this act, and it was known as the “Trail where they Cried”, which is how the Trail of Tears got its name. Though the Trail of Tears greatly impacted Westward Expansion by opening up new lands to white settlers, it killed thousands of Natives by forcing them off the land. Problem Even before the Indians were legally forced off their
The dispersing of the Indians, particularly the five civilized tribes of the southwest: Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole fairly began before the approval of the Indian Removal Act. As the European-Americans were progressing the procedure of passing the Act was bound to happen. They were once a secluded society and now forced to a loss of war. The Indian Removal Act was signed on 1830 by President Andrew Jackson. The act allowed President Andrew Jackson to provide the states with federal funds to remove the civilized tribes and reject the Indians from letting them to be part of the European-American society.
minimum of 640 acres of land and one share of oil. With the discovery of oil on the land this meant each Osage was entitled to and would receive royalty payments for the oil (Gross). The discovery of oil and the royalty payments that came along with it were going to introduce the Osage to a whole new world, a world of wealth. In Christopher Klein’s historical article “The FBI’s First Big Case: The Osage Murders”, he describes for us in detail the wealth the Osage people received. Klein says “Each member of the Osage tribe received quarterly royalty payments, and as the years progressed, so did the number of digits on their check, growing into the hundreds and then the thousands of dollars.
This article states that “In 1956, the U.S. government passed the Indian Relocation Act. The intention of the legislation was to assimilate members of tribal nations into the dominant, white culture, which amounted to immeasurable cultural genocide” (“American Indian