Oscar Wilde, Irish writer, theatrically said in 1891 that “progress has been made” because of “disobedience and... rebellion.” Furthermore, Wilde argues that disobedience is man's original virtue. Disobedience of law led to the American Revolution, desegregation, and improved civil rights across the board, proving that Wilde is correct. However, Wilde's claim ignores disobedience or the law that is regressive and detrimental to the health of the public, such as the Confederacy seceding for slavery, school districts that refused to desegregate, shootings that kill dozens of people. Additionally, in early human life, obedience was important for survival, leading me to believe that disobedience is “man's original virtue” if motivated by greed, …show more content…
The creation of countries, end of segregation, women's suffrage, etc. can be credited to disobedience. America was created because we disobeyed England; we thought that taxation without representation was unfair. Our motive was freedom and justice; the outcome was American people with more rights. In the 50s and 60s, people of color and allies protested segregation with “sit ins”. They disobeyed the laws of segregation and sat in restaurants or other locations designated for white people. Their motive was to end immoral segregation; the outcome was more rights for people of color, and a step towards equality. Moreover, women's suffrage was achieved through protests and sacrifice. They were put in asylums and had their children taken away. The motive: the right for women to vote; the outcome: a more fair and equal society. Examples of the benefits of disobedience do well to prove Wilde's point that “disobedience is a valuable human trait” that “promotes social progress,” because disobedience is found throughout human history and has led to many revolutions and movements that advance human connection, science, arts, etc, but disobedience is not one
Throughout all of time, people have needed to live according to their own agendas. Being forced to live a certain way has only caused trouble. That is why Henry David Thoreau supported civil disobedience to help people live according to their own beliefs. In the essay “On Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, the author defined and explained the effect of civil disobedience. Thoreau defined it as, civil disobedience is any peaceful action that demonstrates the disagreement of a person or persons with their government.
As Oscar Wilde said, “ It is through disobedience that progress has been made-- disobedience and rebellion.” Disobedience during the American Revolution was originally peaceful, but as grievances grew and British rule became harsher, Americans could no longer sit idly by. Radical disobedience to the law was necessary in order to promote change for American society. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s, a drastic nonviolent movement was necessary to counteract the expectation of violence, reiterating to Americans that peaceful resistance to laws can positively affect a free society. The Civil Rights movement was split by two factions: one was a violent resistance named The Black Panthers and the other was a nonviolent protest led by Martin Luther King Jr.
There were two main leaders of this rebellion of sorts, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. These two men had different methods of disobedience, but all sorts of disobedience yearned for the same goal: to establish equal rights for African- Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. used a method of civil disobedience where they would peacefully protest without violence. Sit-ins, marches and other forms of civil disobedience along with many other factors led eventually to the desegregation of America. Without this disobedience, America may still be segregated today and African- Americans wouldn’t have equal rights.
They didn't try to fight or overrule the government, they just informed them what they were doing, and they protested without using violence. In conclusion, civil disobedience is a peaceful, nonviolent, political protest and it has been used by Thomas Jefferson, Thoreau, and Gandhi in their essays “The Declaration of Independence,” “Civil Disobedience,” and “On Nonviolent Resistance.” Civil disobedience is a peaceful, successful way to getting something that you need. For Gandhi, MLK Jr., and Jefferson it worked out well for them and they had much success using civil
Diversity is shown throughout the world in matter such as race, food, religion, and thoughts. Disobedience develops people to break through the standard of the normal and form a contrasting opinion. Just like we see today in the United States, we see 2 different parties running for government positions that have differing beliefs based on past historical figures disagreeing on how the country should be ran. Republicans usually stick to a more conservative opinion while Democrats tend to rebel and have a more liberal opinion. Without someone going against the crowd and being disobedient, we would not have certain religions as well.
Civil Disobedience in the 1920’s and 1930’s Throughout the entirety of the world’s history, civil disobedience can be viewed in many forms and styles. During the 1920’s leading to the Second Great War, which is also known as World War II, one country stood out above the rest in terms of doing what’s best for the nation. I adamantly believe Wilde’s claims of civil disobedience as a valuable human trait to be true.
Disobedience can be defined as failure or refusal to obey rules or someone in authority. Disobedience can also be defined as causing a disarray within society and causing a shift in social normals to more perfectly suit the conditions of a community at a given time, in the sense that it promotes the questions of poor social norms, and the change in our mortal standards and by the progressive though of one’s own mind. Oscar Wilde argues that it can allow society to progress and to allow science about different or certain topics to be broken or misplaced, and the way that it counter our social norms instead of disobedience leading to be a negative human and societal trait in our very way of life. He also argues about how disobedience can lead
Irish author Oscar Wilde claimed that disobedience is a valuable human trait, and that it promotes social progress; thus, without it, social progress would not be made. Civil disobedience is to social progress as hard work is to academic success. With hard work comes academic success, and with civil disobedience comes social progress. Though some see disobedience as a negative trait, it is what has promoted social progress in history by challenging social standards and requiring new social rules to be made. Civil disobedience challenges social standards by expanding views on the current guidelines.
There are times when people must rebel to make a change. It has happened throughout different movements to change unjust laws, and go against unjust people. One big example of civil disobedience during the civil rights movement were sit-ins. Sit-ins were when people continued to peacefully sit in on a restaurant when they were denied service. It was almost a way of life for many people.
Oscar Wilde claims that disobedience is a valuable human trait when it comes to rebellion and social progress. While I agree with the fact that disobedience is a human trait, I don’t think it should be referred to as a valuable one. Disobedience in the form of rebellion can lead to social progress, as showcased in the Industrial Revolution, or it can lead to catastrophe, as depicted in the recent storming of the Capitol. There are thousands of cases where disobedience has made a significant impact on society.
Individuals lay the foundation of America. The Founding Fathers of this unique nation broke their allegiance with Great Britain to create an improved governing body. They desired an individual-centered authority as opposed to Britain’s monarchy, which ruled with tyranny. These Founding Fathers experienced a neglectful democratic monarchy that cared little about the ethical treatment of its people. The domineering actions of Britain challenged these historic individuals to form a new cultural identity.
As kids people get taught what is wrong and right from a parental figure or experiences of life teach us how to react to different situations. When we finally turn adults no one is there to remind us of what’s good and what's bad so we have to use our past experiences and our knowledge to help guide us. Each adult shapes their societies for their generation and many more generations to come. Mohandas k. Gandhi and Susan B Anthony’s speech along with the article Selma to Montgomery March on history show that civil disobedience is a moral responsibility.
People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from
Disobedience – the refusal to obey rules or someone in authority - inspires social progress by the use of boycotts and stories specifically in my own life because by doing the wrong action will improve our knowledge for the future. Disobedience shapes our society into the way it is. Some may disagree that acts of disobedience have no purpose but I tend to agree that disobedience has played a huge role in our world. Wilde claims that disobedience is man’s original virtue and is a valuable human trait. Disobedience can be a good thing and a bad thing depending on the situation.
Disobedience is highly praised by Oscar Wilde as he observed the human species living in their natural habitat. In 1891, Wilde observed that it is through disobedience that progress has been made. It is through disobedience such as rebellions that has made become the free and prosperous nation that many want to live in. For example, Rosa Parks an African American who lived during the 1950s barely expressed any rights.