The Missouri Approach was formed by the Missouri Division of Youth Services in the Department of Social Services in Missouri. This department oversees the treatment of delinquent youths. 86% of the delinquents are male while 14% of them are female. Most of them are minorities and from urban areas. More than half of these crimes committed by the delinquents are felonies. The goal of this program is to prevent teenagers from reoffending or getting into the system (The missouri approach - about the Missouri approach). Missouri has created a juvenile system that was successful. This is because it is made of several smaller facilities to keep these kids closer to their homes. Each facility houses 10-30 youths. Few of these facilities contain isolation …show more content…
Compared to other states, Missouri has the lowest percentage of recidivism among juvenile offenders. The juveniles also get a second chance at education and to further pursue it. The youths begin to make progress within a year. Then there is money being saved for taxpayers because billions of dollars are spent on correctional systems annually. The Missouri model has saved their state millions of dollars due to the reduced recidivism. The kids in the juvenile facilities often suffer from physical or sexual abuse and the staff provide them with a safe environment. They will form meaningful relationships with these juveniles and then they become willing to change their behaviors. In addition, these systems are built like homes and close to families. They will never be far away from their families. This system implements a group treatment model instead of isolating them and leaving them defenseless to other delinquents. They teach and practice safety through relationships and supervision. They emphasize the importance of safety from abuse and humiliation. The staff aid youths in building their academic and communication skills, so they are prepared when they are released. They even reach out to their families to aid in their rehabilitation, seeing family members can give them the desire to change …show more content…
I think building new local facilities would reunite families and bring them closer to their homes. That way staff can connect with their families to assist in the juvenile’s rehabilitation. The staff could learn more about the inmate through their families to better their techniques and strengthen their bond. Because they practice safety and trust within these facilities. The only issues with these new facilities would be property taxes but this project is worth it due to the high success rate in Missouri. Although not all locations are the same, I believe the results can be universal if they utilize the same techniques as Missouri. Every state has urban and rural towns, the difference is just the
The reason this is one of my choices is that I believe a range of community-based alternatives are very beneficial to the needs of most juveniles and is also less costly. By having different community-based alternatives many juveniles can be sentenced to home confinement, community service, counseling, etc. which will keep the juvenile offender out of a detention center or from being incarcerated. I truly believe that juveniles should be given different alternatives, especially if it keeps the juvenile from being
Essentially, it is obvious St. Louis City juvenile justice has taken great strides in ensuring their clients partake in juvenile justice reform. Certainly, over the years this has been the center piece of the institution in providing a plethora of services, which compassionately meets many of the needs of its youth. However, despite the history and longevity associated with the St. Louis City’s juvenile system, including the uniqueness of the services they provide within the institution today. The need to further develop facility resources, which provides adequate programming and additional tools for its detainees and staff is continual. Clearly, the institution has undoubtedly exceeded many of its own expectations over the years, impressively
According to the book, Lost Angeles County is the largest juvenile justice system in America; yet, the home for most of the youths who have committed grievous crimes. Home for those who seems to have a chance at rehabilitation but are sentenced to adult prison for no logical reason while some youth are freed with little consequences after committing a violent crimes. This is a shameful thing that needs to be corrected in the juvenile justice system. Two and half million children under eighteen are being arrested in the United States in a year, three out of four will be released as if nothing happened, their cases will be dismissed because they are too minor for the system to break-down or too difficult to try. The repeated offenders will receive a meaningful punishment when their offenses have progressed to a more serious level.
The data that was assembled from the program was found inconclusive and conflicting (Gould, p.5). Recidivism rates seemed to remain the same while the perception that the youth had of their treatment improved but those results didn’t appeal to the public (Gould,
There are indication that most criminals have a juvenile records in the US, indicating that crime manifests from a tender age. Therefore, to reverse the incidence of crime, it follows that the best strategy is to reduce the criminal orientation in the juvenile offenders as opposed to hardening them and preparing them for criminal careers. The case of the Crossroads Juvenile Center demonstrates the willingness of the juvenile justice systems to make these changes on the children. References Day, S. (2014). Runaway Man: A Journey Back to Hope.
This program promotes a positive collaboration between offending youths, the justice system, and the community through the acceptance of responsibility, compliance with the disposition, and the completion of sanctions without a formal juvenile record. The intended outcome of this program is to reduce court backlogs, improve timeliness of case adjudication, cost savings, and accountability for first time, in some cases, second chances for misdemeanor offenders within the local community. Social learning theory proposes that youths learn deviance through imitation, cognitive definitions, differential reinforcement and association (Akers & Lee, 1996). Social influence theory contains conceptual elements of peer pressure, normative influence, and modeling (Maxwell, 2002).
The United States boasts their juvenile justice system as one which rehabilitates youth and focuses on keeping juvenile delinquents out of the system in their future. However, it is apparent through the president’s statement that America could make far more advancements in the functions of the juvenile justice system. While many great reforms have taken place in
Education will be provided to the juveniles to explain the repercussions of their actions and the results of another offence. Education will also be proved to the parents/guardians to improve the home situation and how to help the juvenile take on the restorative justice program in full force. Pre-program assessments must be completed for every juvenile to be place in this restorative justice program. Assessments will be taken often during and after the programs completion. The initial assessment will be a set in place to gather background information on the juveniles family/community situation, and continuous mental, physical and
Financial feasibility: With both state and federal budgets being tight the cost of housing a juvenile in a detention center is “at an average cost of $240.99 per day per youth” (Justice Policy, 2009 p. 1) this can lead to billions a year for taxpayers even though “majority are held for nonviolent offenses and could be managed safely in the community” (Justice Policy Institute, 2009 p 1) and that is more financially feasible than incarcerating
The balanced and restorative approach provides a significant change in toles and image of the juvenile justice system from a revolving door to a resource. The resource makes juvenile offenders accountable and enhances the quality of life within communities by community restoration using preventive services to help improve the safety of the community. 2-Compare and contrast the different types of restorative justice (i.e., VOM, FGC, NRB, peacemaking/sentencing circles)
This means that while those in the program followed their parole they reoffended on different charges at the same rate as those who were not engaged in the program one year after release. The program decrease recidivism within the short term but more needed to be done program wise in the long term. Overall the program was successful. Under the guidelines offenders recidivism dropped, and cost decreased when compared to more traditional forms of treatment (Malmut, Burke
This can be seen in the growing number of court-involved status offenders who were being detained and placed outside of their homes for noncriminal behavior (Shubik & Kendall, 2007). Following multiple studies and research, the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice recommended that the juvenile court be the agency of last resort and that community-based organizations, not penal institutions, should be responsible for these youths (Shubik & Kendall, 2007; Farrington,
The main goal was to be able to prevent delinquency and improve juvenile justice system by providing local and state efforts with discretionary and block grants that supplied support to youth programs developed by public and private youth agencies. Each state has four requirements they must achieve and maintain to receive the formula grants program which are “deinstitutionalization of status offenders, separation of youth from adults in secure facilities, removal of youths from adult jails and lockups, and addressing disproportionate minority contact with the juvenile justice systems.” Failure to acheive and maintain these four requirements will result in a decrease which isn’t effective for the youth who are entering the juvenile justice system since their goal is to prevent and provide services that will change and shape their future. The main type of facilities that are provided by this act are juvenile detention centers, long-term secure facility, reception center, and diagnostic center. These facilities were provided to give the children a sense of how the adult system operates, but provide many inside resources that work toward helping them return to their life in a safe and healthy way so they will not
The cost of creating and maintain juvenile detention centers is insane. During the 1990s “the juvenile justice system saw a 43% increase in spending, mainly as a response to the expenditures that accompanied the increased confinement of juvenile offenders” (Gaudio, 2010). It has been proven that juvenile’s brains are not as developed as adults and the threat of detention does not affect them as much as it would in an adult so it would not be as affective at deterring crime. Being incarcerated also may make a juvenile more likely to reoffend once they are released.
(1994). JUVENILE OFFENDERS: WHAT WORKS? A Summary of Research