P alleges false arrest. P alleges he was visiting his grandmother in a NYCHA building when MOS approached him and arrested him for trespassing. P alleges that a trespass notice was issued to him by NYCHA which prohibited him entering NYCHA property which is not his residence. P alleges that he was removed from the excluded people list and he showed the MOS paperwork showing that he was removed from the list. P alleges at the precinct he suffered an asthma an attack and was taken to the hospital. MOS Wesolowski was driving MOS Diana Pichardo and observed P in the outside courtyard. MOS Wesolowski had previously arrested P for trespass at the location and had knowledge that P was issued a NYCHA Trespass Notice. MOS Wesolowski states that he called
On 09/18/2016, at approximately 2148 hours, at the Durango Jail located at3225 W Gibson Ln Phoenix, AZ 85009 an Inmate/Inmate fight had occurred in Durango 3 B Pod between Inmate Moothery, Naz T303229 and Inmate Sams, Worine T284566. Upon entering Durango 3 B Pod, Inmate Sams approached Inmate Moothery and begun fighting by Durango 3 B Pod door. Multiple strikes were thrown by both inmates until Inmate Moothery had fallen to the Pod floor. At that time Officer Serrano approached the pod door and gave both inmates commands to stop fighting. No radio call was made due to both inmates complying with the orders given.
• P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P claims he was at his former girlfriend’s apartment when two MOS arrested. P claims that he was placed in RMP and taken to PSA 6 precinct. P claims that at the precinct several MOS assaulted him causing him to lose vision in one eye. MOS Carlos Sierra was not present at the precinct for the incident.
P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that she was in her kitchen when MOS broke her front door and entered the apartment and pushed her against the wall. P alleges that MOS handcuffed her and Noel Tartlaon, Noel Tartlaon, Jr. and Farrow Wright (non-parties). Defendant MOS Jose Peinan states that MOS were executing a search warrant obtain after confidential informant bought drugs form Jumaane, (non-party). MOS Peinan states that Jumane was arrested in the lobby and narcotics were recovered from him.
Stark noticed the Officer Safety issue with interviewing the Victim in front of the door, and asked him to move to the side away from the flow of pedestrian traffic. Stark spoke with the Officer that had responded prior to our arrival and got the information that the Officer had already obtained. Stark re-interviewed the Victim, and come to the conclusion that the crime elements of PC211 were not met. I asked Stark what he believed the crime was, he stated PC 484 - petty theft. Stark gave the Victim a business card with the report number.
PRELIMINARY COMMENTS Subject: Defendants Stockton Police Department, Chief Eric Jones, Sgt. Mathew Garlick, and Officer Lucas Woodward Motion for Summary Judgment Defendants Stockton Police Department, Chief Eric Jones, Sgt. Mathew Garlick and Officer Lucas Woodward Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FACTS A. Hiring of Officer Woodward by Chief Eric Jones On January 31, 2012, Sergeant Meyers told the San Diego Police Department that Officer Woodward conducted a probation search and misled him.
On Wednesday 10-14-15 at approximately 1700 hours I Officer Hildebrand and Sgt. Hard were advised by dispatch that Debra Vanblaricom was at the station asking to talk to an officer. Debra wished to report an assault on her granddaughter. We met with Debra in the Police Department to speak with her. Debra stated that she feared for her granddaughter 's safety.
P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was giving his friend a cane when MOS arrested him. P alleges that he did not have any drugs instead his friend (non-party) had Xanax pills. MOS state that UC observed P in hand to hand drug transaction. P was unable to make bail and remained incarcerated for 6 days.
United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) Capsule Summary: Seizing a person’s luggage for an extended period until a warrant is obtained violates the Fourth Amendment as beyond the limits of a Terry stop, but, a sniff by a narcotics dog does not constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. Facts: The respondent Raymond Place was stopped by Federal Agents (DEA) upon his arrival into LaGuardia Airport on a Friday afternoon. The respondent refused to consent to the search of his luggage. His luggage was seized by the agents under suspicion they contained narcotics. The respondent was informed the agents would be obtaining a search warrant from a judge.
In summary, on 06/05/16 at 2254 hours Ofc. E. Vera #289 and I were patrolling the area of 5900 W Roosevelt Rd. , at which time I observed a vehicle (03 ' silver Volkswagen IL Y804576) disregard the stop light located at 59th Ave./Roosevelt Road. A traffic stop was conducted on the vehicle.
So, officer Sultemeier and I ended our search and made our way to the Recreation yard to find inmates CORPUS, CAITLYN DIANE #6904 MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN #7077 arguing. We then separated the two inmates and pulled out MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN and talked to her about why were they were fighting. MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN stated that “CORPUS, CAITLYN DIANE #6904 is picking on VANN, RACHAEL MICHELE #6737 and how if they were on the streets somebody would’ve checked that bitch”. I officer Zagada then felt the need to remove MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN
Good Afternoon your honor, I am filing a motion for the admissibility of Cameron Awbrey’s statement because there is clear signs of attenuation between the statement given and the arrest. I will prove my case by providing examples of precedent cases similar to the laws involved in Cameron's case. In the precedent case Utah v. Strieff, the accused was survallinced over a short period of time, was subjected to an unlawful stop and arrest but later received a lawful arrest. The question was whether or not the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine applied, which excludes evidence that is gained from an unlawful search or seizure.
On 04-20-2017 I responded to the wooded area West of Walmart. I was called to the scene by the Port Richey Code Enforcement officers. I was advised that defendant and her boyfriend, identified as, Thomas Blow, were trespassing on private property. I recognized both the defendant and Blow from their D.A.V.I.D. photos and previous encounters. The defendant also identified herself as, Stephanie Trost.
After I terminated the relationship with the Chief of Police’s niece he approached me several times and spoke about the relationship. He advised me on more than one occasion that his family wants me to be fired from my position as a police officer because of breaking up with her. Shortly thereafter the Chief attempted to discipline me for violations of the department that either did not occur or were not rules or enforced. The Mount Carmel Township Police Officer’s Union and I were forced to argue the decision he made.
On 04-09-2016 at 0315 hours I noticed a pickup stopped on Main Street about Mulberry Street with the passenger door open. The vehicle then turned onto Mulberry Street and pulled to the side of the road. I made contact with the occupants of the vehicle and was advised by dispatch Jenae Sisson had an active warrant for her arrest. Sisson was placed under arrest and placed into hand restraints which were properly fitting and double locked.
MOS had called for backup. A few minutes later, MOS located Mr. Wilson’s vehicle however Mr. Wilson and P were not inside the vehicle. Then, an individual informed MOS that P was sitting at the individual’s steps. MOS approached P and P fought MOS and refused to be handcuffed. P was yelling, screaming and attempted to kick out a window in the RMP.