ipl-logo

PETA Rhetorical Analysis

423 Words2 Pages

PETA is an acronym for the non profit organization of people for the ethical treatment of animals. The are dedicated to the protecting the rights of animals.

The narrative is told by a small girl saying a blessing at a Thanksgiving table. The story is laden with propaganda and oppositional text . The message the girl is conveying in her blessing is the turkey suffers while being raised to be slaughtered. She then proceeds to explain the slaughter process in graphic detail to shock the viewer. The for an added dose she additional makes comments about chemincal, dirt and feces in the turkey after it killed and ready to cook. The audience of this video is all meat eating people regardless of age. The emotional appeal that is used to sway you …show more content…

The cooked turkey ( the mascot of thanksgiving) is being placed on the table and the man placing the turkey requests the girl to say a blessing. She starts the blessing by shocking the audience with thanking god for the turkey they are about to eat and the turkey farms where they pack the turkeys in dark little sheds for their whole lives. This is clearly propaganda to shock the audience into listening to more of the rhetoric. She then proceeds to tell of mistreatment of turkeys in captivity and the killing of them to prepare for dinner table. And then to add insult to injury she states thank you for the special chemicals, dirt and poop in the turkey which we are about to eat. The faces of the people at the table clearly indicate discomfort and disturbed looks on their faces. Then she states let’s eat and they look among them like who can eat after that blessing. This is total persuavie logic and emotional appeal by giving a negative message on the preparation of the turkey for the table. Her goal is to make the people at the table as well as the audience viewing uncomfortable with facts that are skewed towards peta.

The stereotype here is white American families are participating in Thanksgiving and find some of the facts and persuasive language used in the blessing disturbing. This blessing is an appeal to prejudices of the listeners. The Branding is clear in the last 2 slides of the video by be thank

Show More
Related

  • Chef's Fight For Songbird Analysis

    767 Words  | 4 Pages

    We are all familiar with the notion of “pleasure.” Simple pleasures are ever-present in our lives but complex, extended pleasures are fulfilling yet fleeting. They bring about intense experiences to gratify our desires, although they are not a necessity, in the same way slaughtering and plating an overhunted species is not absolutely imperative. However, despite my own belief that an endangered species is not to be poached upon, I commend Liz Alderman for completing “Chefs Fight for Songbird” in a way in which she successfully set key points from both sides of the arguments while also discreetly and strategically establishing and backing her own position in the feud. For those completely unfamiliar with the topic, Alderman might be able to

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    This short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly

    Read More

  • Foer Eating Animals Analysis

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals is a book about persuasion. Foer seeks to convince his readers to take any step in reducing what he believes is the injustice of harming animals. To achieve this, Foer employs many persuasion techniques and often changes his approach when he targets specific groups. His strategies include establishing himself as an ethical authority and appealing to his readers’ emotions, morals, and reason.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of What's Wrong With Animal Rights By Vicki Hearne

    123 Words  | 1 Pages

    In her work “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights,” Vicki Hearne challenges common beliefs of animal rights, arguing that animal rights groups do very little to actually benefit animals. She argues that natural selection should be allowed to take place for wild animals, and animals such as cats and dogs should not be seen as property. To persuade the audience to support her position, she uses ethos, pathos, and logos. Her credibility as a trainer makes the logic behind her views reliable, her logic reinforces the examples she uses, and she appeals to emotion using her relationship with her Airedale, Drummer, to support everything her argument is saying. Through these strategies, Vicki Hearne effectively counters the current, popular views of the

    Read More

  • Frankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

    743 Words  | 3 Pages

    Discursive Essay (1st Draft) – Kevin Cho I have detested animal testing ever since I watched a document showing orangutan tortured to death during the animal testing. I was physically and mentally sick when I looked into its eyes. Now, while you are reading this essay, perhaps holding a scrumptious apple pie in your hand, hundreds of, thousands of feeble animals are dying by inhumane animal tests.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within Holder’s speech there were instances of multiple fallacies. One specific fallacy is the generalizations Holder makes in his speech, much like the ones that were used for deductive reasoning. These generalizations were often subjective and not backed up with evidence, which leads to hasty generalizations. Holder states that those who are against animal testing are mainly youth, which infers that all youth are against animal testing. However, it is not just youth who are against animal testing and not all youth are not against animal testing.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Food Inc

    1065 Words  | 5 Pages

    Food, Inc. leaks a certain mystery behind, which contains the true secrets about the journey food takes. Food, Inc., a documentary that demonstrates the current and growth method of food production since the 1950’s, is designed to inform Americans about a side of the food industry. Food Inc. also used persuasion to demonstrates some components of pathos, logos, and ethos while uncovering the mysterious side of the food industry in America. Robert Kenner, the director of Food, Inc., made this film for a purpose. Uncovering the hidden facts and secrets behind the food industry in America.

    Read More

  • Jonathan Foer Let Them Eat Dog Rhetorical Analysis

    1521 Words  | 7 Pages

    In fact, within this claim he mentions dogs in a way that forces the reader to reflect on the claims he made about dogs earlier within the piece. Foer argues for the consumption of dog in a logical way in order to draw attention to a bigger issue: the treatment of animals in factory-farmed meat. While Foer might still be pro-eating dog, his entire argument that he presents throughout the essay is, essentially, a different perspective on the issue of factory-farmed meat. He relates this issue to the audience by bringing up a controversial topic, and while he may not convince his audience to eat dog, he at the very least shows that, logically, eating dog could make sense. Once he has made his point clear, he points to hypothetical situations of how dogs would be humanely prepared if they were to be eaten by stating, “we can all agree that if we’re going to eat them, we should kill them quickly and painlessly” (605).

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Silent Spring By Rachel Carson

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson accusingly delivers a powerful argument against aerial pesticides, especially parathion. Carson emphasizes that farmers who eradicate “distasteful” birds with parathion are heartless. She deploys a variety of language to support her central argument: exemplification, rhetorical questions, diction, and emotional appeal. Carson believes poisoning birds--with parathion--is cruel and inhumane.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

    945 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Animal Farm, George Orwell warns how power will often lead to corruption. Napoleon was placed in a position of power after Major died, and he slowly starts to lavish in his power and become addicted to the lush life of a dictator. When Napoleon first becomes a leader, he expresses how everyone will work equally, but as his reign goes on, he shortens the work hours. At the very end of the novel, the observing animals even start to see that pig and man had become the same. The irony present in the above example, illuminates how regardless of how much a ruler promises to maintain equality and fairness, the position of power that they hold, will corrupt them.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of David Wallace's 'Consider The Lobster'

    1736 Words  | 7 Pages

    The consumption of animal meat is highly accepted in today’s society, however, the methods, in which the animals are killed are sometimes questioned for their cruelty. David Wallace, in considering the Lobster, takes the readers to the Maine Lobster Festival, where the consumption of lobsters is exploited, and the festival's attendees celebrate these acts. However, the essay goes furthermore than narrating the lobster’s festival, because through sensory details, and different techniques, he makes the readers question society’s morality. By stressing the cruelty it takes boiling lobsters alive, Wallace is capable of creating a sense of awareness in society decisions that demonstrate their corrupted morality, and how it affects directly others (like lobsters)

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.

    Read More

  • Cruelty To Animals Rhetorical Analysis

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most of us have pets and consider them part of the family. As a result, we could never imagine the horror some animals are forced to endure at the hands of their caretakers. This particular ad depicts a powerful visual of a neglected dog, in poor health, chained to what seems to be a barrel. The copy in the ad, while minimal, is powerful: “Help Us Help them” and the words “Donate Today” (ASPCA). This ad is a public service announcement to bring awareness to the community concerning the horrors of animal abuse, its helpless victims, and to compel the public to make a financial donation to put an end to animal cruelty.

    Read More

  • Steve Cutts Eating Chicken

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    “How many animals had to unnecessarily die for you to eat?” It appears that he is a vegetarian and has firm beliefs in not eating meat, it isn’t just because it can make you fat, he shows that he sincerely cared about their lives lost and that is why he included their tongues hanging out. Their tongues hanging out can also represent a drink of water and water makes plants grow too and you should eat more plants. It was interesting how he drew the restaurants logos upside down, I took this as another implication that we eat everything and are on the top of the food chain, it is an emotional plea as to “How would we feel if roles were reversed and we too were under someone in the food chain?” and “When will our meat eating

    Read More

More about PETA Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document