Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation Possibly the most important case dealing with indecency, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation called attention to the radio broadcasting use of indecent language. A comedian named George Carlin recorded a satirical monologue about the way society views language in a routine called “Seven Words You Can Never Use on Television” (Ray, 1990, pg.83). WBAI, a radio station belonging to the Pacifica Foundation, aired the monologue one afternoon after warning audiences before hand that the segment would include graphic language. According to William B. Ray, in the bit, Carlin mentioned the seven words multiple times, “shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits,” using them in non-sexual sentences (p. 83). However, a father riding in a car with his teenage son tuned in to the broadcast after the content warning, heard Carlin’s use of these words, and filed an …show more content…
The FCC claimed that two of Fox’s previous on-air broadcasts of the Billboard Music Awards were in violation of the new indecency policy (Zelezny, 2010). The first incident referenced was at the 2002 Billboard Music Awards when Cher said “I’ve also had critics for the last 40 years saying that I was on my way out every year. Right. So fuck ‘em” when accepting her award (Zelezny, 2010, p.481). The second Notice was issued for the Billboard Music Awards broadcast from the following year where presenter Nichole Richie said in reference to her reality TV show, “have you ever tried to get cow shit out of a Prada purse? It’s not so fucking simple” (Zelezny, 2010, pg. 481). Fox challenged the FCC’s policy claiming that it violated the station’s First Amendment rights and fell under the category of “arbitrary and capricious“ outlined in the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §702). (Denniston, 2009; Zelezny,
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell Oral Argument Summary The oral argument in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell consists of Isaacman’s arguments along with the justices’ questioning of both attorneys. Isaacman argued that parody, specifically the Campari Ad which contained a fake interview about Jerry Falwell’s incestuous relationship with his mother, should be protected by the First Amendment. On the other side of the argument, Grutman who represented Jerry Falwell argued that the speech should be held liable because it caused emotional distress.
Case name and Citation Costanza v. Seinfeld 181 Misc. 2d 562, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County 1999) Parties Michael Costanza, Plaintiff, Jerry Seinfeld, Defendant, Larry David, Defendant, National Broadcasting Company, Defendant, Production companies, Defendant FACTS
The Constitution limits power on Government through Checks and Balances. In a 1944 case between Korematsu and the United States during World War II, a presidential executive order gave the military authority to exclude citizens of Japanese descent from areas deemed critical to national defense and potentially vulnerable to espionage. Along with this they also arrested Japanese Americans and forced them into internment camps. Korematsu however, a US citizen from ancestry descent, refused to leave his home in San Leandro, California. Korematsu appealed, and in 1944 the case reached the Supreme Court.
As Holmes had stated there are other forms that are not protected which are known as lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and insulting words. The case Chaplinsky v New Hampshire in 1942 determined that fighting words and other forms of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. Chaplinsky had argued that the New Hampshire law violated his Fourteenth Amendment which prohibits states from infringing on citizens’ fundamental freedoms and as a result, kept him from exercising his First Amendment rights of free speech. While states are not allowed to inhibit expression of ideas, the Court did not convict him for the expression of his ideas but because his words (calling religion a ‘racket’ and a city marshal ‘damned racketeer’ and ‘damned fascist’)
The Supreme Court concluded that the parody contained no statement of fact and thusly established that if that element was not present, there could be no recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress for public figures. The court ruled that the ad was protected under the First Amendment and was an obvious satire, which does not meet the standard of actual malice. Hustler Magazine v. Falwell established that a public figure may not recover for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress without showing that the publication contains a false statement of fact made with actual
Response to Freda I am in total agreement with you Freda about using graphic organizers which helps construct meaning. Likewise, I am a visual learner and this organizer is awesome and is very beneficial when researching articles and collecting information. Therefore, it will improve communication more effectively when writing my literature review. Reference freeology.com/graphicorgs/
Issues of Social and Economic Justice Throughout my experience in the Panhandle Promise Project, I had the opportunity to closely examine the injustice many of the clients experience based on their race, economic status, or in the criminal justice system. Since the starting of America’s war on drugs longer sentencing for drug offences that in violent crimes, there has been an increase of the number of minorities who are currently in prison (Wormer, Kaplan, and Juby (2012). For the children having a parent incarcerated affects them in several different ways, such as having a higher risk of being place in foster care (Andersen and Wildeman, 2014) , poor school performance (Eddy et al., 2014), food insecurity (Turney, 2014c), antisocial behavioral problems (Jarjoura et al., 2011f). For women who have been release from prison new barriers limit the assistance they will received, the ineligibility for food stamps (Travis, 2002), and in some cases the loss of their children custody (Welsh, 2014b).
Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language. For example, sexually explicit, material that contains offensive language, and often times material that is unsuited to any age group.
Overall, perhaps one of George Carlin’s most endearing traits is the value he placed on individuality and free thought. Throughout his long and esteemed career, he made an impact by being unashamedly himself. He didn’t bend to anyone’s will, and believed it was his duty to challenge, criticize, and blaspheme that which was considered sacred. George Carlin, through his love of the individual and his contempt of the institution, solidified his place as one of the most distinct voices of all time, and will continue to impact those who hear his message and decide that they
The Terry Fox Foundation (TFF) is an organization founded in 1980 after Terry Fox, a 20-year old patient with bone cancer, ran his Marathon of Hope 5300 km across Canada to raise awareness and money for cancer research. Terry ran “simply to remind Canadians of the importance of finding a cure” (The Terry Fox Foundation ) The TFF holds an annual run in Terry’s name to fundraise for cancer research and bring the visions/values of their organization to life. The TFF believes it is important to tell Terry’s story, and show how one hard working Canadian can make a difference by standing up and doing what they believe in. Since 1980, the TFF has raised over $700 million in Terry’s name and has generously donated it all to cancer research.
The fighting words category also states that a protesters are not allowed to partake in name calling or use derogatory terms toward the directed audience. This was put in place after Chaplinsky v New Hampshire, 1942. This trail took place because the actions of Chaplinsky. Chaplinsky Was passing out pamphlets when the city marshal confronted him. Chaplinsky said some choice words
In her article, “Censorship 101,” West crafts her text through numerous court case experience and skill in rhetorical devices as her background expertise is used to her advantage. Sonja West begins her argument with the use of exemplification in a previous court case. The scene is set in 1962, and West garments the introduction with excessive details and biased language as readers quickly root for the victory of the Tinker case and share the celebratory state of their
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978) describe a scenario about them driving in their car and some profanity came on air. He then complained to the FCC and gave him a response which was not anything formal but an advice to "associated with the station 's license file, and, in the event subsequent complaints are received, the Commission will then decide whether it should utilize any of the available sanctions it has been granted by Congress (1978). " Which means there is limited sanction they can take because based on the constitution restrain must be substantial and poses a threat, false, misleading
I would like to congratulate the Woodson Foundation, the schools district, and the NCPIE for attempting to address this problem in the Washington, D.C school district. This is a very important issue and need the upmost effort put forward. This group is past the first stage which is forming stage, the purpose of the group has been established. In this respect the group should know this and not revisit the purpose of the task they agreed to take on.
Almost every modern, successful female pop musician has succumbed to this sexist ideal in order to be able to play their music on the greatest stages. In 2014, P!nk put on an acrobatic, Cirque-like performance at the Grammy’s (Ng). Miley Cyrus is widely known for employing twerking and explicit gestures within her performances as a way to shock her audience. At the 2004 SuperBowl, Janet Jackson’s revealing costume and promiscuous performance with Justin Timberlake resulted in the unintentional exposing of her