The two myths, Phaethon and Daedalus and Icarus, describe two foolishly ambitious young boys. Throughout the myths of Phaethon and Daedalus and Icarus the boys cause conflict that leads to consequences. Their foolishness in the myths easily depicts their thoughtless and stubborn character as they make huge mistakes as a verdict of their behavior. Through the use of conflict and characterisation both mythical protagonists, Phaethon and Icarus, demonstrate a shared lesson that a prideful disregard of the warnings from those who are older and wiser can quickly lead to disastrous consequences. First, the conflict of both stories unequivocally show Phaethon and Icarus neglect the warnings of consequences from older and wiser people. In both stories, …show more content…
After Phaethon and Epaphus race, Epaphus loses and becomes angry. Epaphus challenges Phaethon that Phaethon has never seen his father, and Phaethon is to stuck-up to decline. This conflict is character vs. character because of Epaphus challenging Phaethon. This is the inciting incident to the plot which puts the myth in motion. Later in the story, the type of conflict stays the same but the characters change. Next, Phaethon and his father Apollo are arguing about Phaethon riding the sun chariot across the sky, a difficult and dangerous quest for even Apollo himself. This can be put in the category of conflict because Phaethon argues with his father about whether he should ride the sun chariot. Secondly, in the myth Daedalus and Icarus the story begins with the idea, “King Minos wanted…”(59). In this section, Daedalus was asked to build a palace for a wicked king, who was named King Minos. Daedalus excepted and did so but was not allowed to leave. Daedalus built a maze underneath the palace just as he had been told to do but was horrified about what it was to be used for, and the maze was to house and evil creature that fed upon humans! King Minos horribly did not let him leave because he was the only one that
he was brave enough to go, and find the Minotaur to kill him the people would rather be lost in a maze and be completely lost then to see minotaur. The Minotaur very powerful and he ate humans who had been shut into the labyrinth by King Minos. In the text it states that “It was powerful and savage, and it loved to eat the flesh of the humans who had been shut into the labyrinth by King Minos. They acted similar because they were all brave and took risks for other
Much of Athenian life and politics was based on stories of Athenian history. These historical events shaped the way and life of Athenian actions. Yet what happens when the histories that become integral aspects of Athens are based on inaccuracies? The history of Harmodius and Aristogeiton and the impact that it had on Athens was so deep that it led to the catastrophe that was the trials surrounding the defacement of the statues of Hermes. However, Athenian misunderstanding of the situation brings into question the legitimacy of Athenian democracy as a whole, something Thucydides uses his retelling of Harmodius and Aristogeiton to convey.
In The Odyssey by Homer, Homer introduces the epic with a struggle between Odysseus’ son, Telemachus, and the suitors. Suitors plague the household, once inhabited by the missing Odyssey, devour all of its food, and amuse themselves within its vast halls. There, they try to wed Penelope, Odysseus’ wife, yet she refuses to do so. Telemachus and the suitors engage in a grand debate over the suitors’ use of the palace. Telemachus argues for their removal and the suitors argue to stay until Penelope agrees to marry.
In Phaethon, the author promotes Phaethon’s bravery. As the story begins the author uses diction to describe the climb to the Sun God’s palace. He says, “A mortal dared to approach. ”(1) As the story continues the author shows bravery through Phaethon’s actions.
There are some major conflicts in the Odyssey. In the story Odysseus comes across situations that he thinks he can take advantage of because he thinks he can get away with doing things. Because he thinks so highly of himself and he is useduse to others thinking highly of himself, he gets into some major conflicts. In the Odyssey it states, “Ah how shameless- the way these mortals blame the gods. From us alone, they say, come all their miseries, yes, but they themselves, with their own reckless ways, compound their pains beyond their proper share” (Homer 32-35).
Sundiata and The Odyssey are two out of the many great great orally told tales in all of mankind history. In writing, comparing your work to another similar text is extremely important for making your paper understandable to any audience. In this case, I will be comparing the two similar texts, The Odyssey and Sundiata: An Epic of Old Mali. Both of these two tables show the characters, Sundiata and Odysseus, long quests of pursuing and accomplishing a certain objective. To reach their goal, both characters encounter obstacles and enemies who want to stop them on their prolonged journey.
Both stories have similar settings
The stories also had some differences, though they are
However, in both stories, the exact same thing happened.
The theme “pitfalls of temptation” are demonstrated in The Odyssey by Homer as well as in real life. And, no, this paper is not about how to make bear traps. First, the “pitfalls of temptation” are demonstrated several times in the Odyssey. One example of this is when Odysseus’ men
Daedalus had been commissioned by King Minos to build an impossible maze to imprison the mighty Minotaur. However, Daedalus and Icarus were sentenced to the impossible-to-crack maze, after Daedalus had fallen out of favor with the King. Icarus knew the maze like the back of his hand - he had helped his father build it, afterall. The labyrinth was a series of intricate dark corridors, endlessly meandering, which kept the Minotaur at its center. The beast still lay there, a pile of dust.
Summary King Minos was a powerful man. He had a great palace. Inside his palace he had a maze. In the middle of the maze was a creature called the Minotaur. Minos demanded that every single year he send him seven young women and seven young men.
In the epic poem, the Iliad written by Homer, several characters taking part in the warfare between the Achaeans and the Trojans are portrayed as embodying the heroic code of courage, physical strength, leadership, arete of value of honour, and the acceptance of fate. The heroic code is illustrated by the actions of the Trojan prince, Hector and the Achaeans strongest warrior, Achilles. Both of these characters display the Greek’s image of a hero, and can also let the reader discern what the society admires, looks up to and aspires to in its heroes. There are also characters who fail to be heroic, such as the Trojan “vivid and beautiful” prince, Paris. These characters in the Iliad illustrate the qualities that Ancient Greek society values.
It can be seen as a trend throughout history that stories reflect a society’s culture and values. One of the most memorable and inspirational civilization that made a substantial contribution to literature was Greece. Sophocles, a renowned Greek playwright, is beloved for his dramatic and action-filled plays that effectively satisfied the ancient audience. In Sophocles’ tragic play, Oedipus the King, the main character, Oedipus finds difficulty proclaiming his purpose against the fate bestowed upon him by the gods. Alongside his struggling, the values and cultural aspects of the Greeks emerge, reflecting their views on society during that time period at which the play was produced.
Pride often leads to someone’s downfall - this idea has been developed from the playwright “Oedipus the king” through Rey’s interactive oral presentation. He discussed that Oedipus’ excessive pride over his knowledge due to solving riddles allows him to not listen to others including the respected Prophet , his dear relative Kreon - he seldom pays heed to them and decides to pursue further for searching the predecessor’s murderer . His own path opens up hidden , dark truth about his life. From the presentation it has been evident that Oedipus was not smart enough to realize that the path he set for himself, will eventually bring nothing but pain.