The allegation in this complaint is inappropriate prescribing of pain medication by Dr. Warbritton, to patient Paul Faulconer. A medical review of the case was performed by Dr. Cupp who submitted several follow-up questions. Dr. Warbritton also responded to the Board in writing, saying Faulconer’s healthcare has been complicated and pain management is essential.
Kay Pratt (complainant) felt Dr. Warbritton prescribed Paul OxyContin, but Dr. Warbritton said he never prescribed OxyContin to Faulconer, only Oxycodone. Paul did receive OxyContin for pain management, but it was from the hospital following his surgery. Warbritton said Kay has not had much, if any, dealings with Paul’s medical issues. He assumed that Kay would want to discuss Paul's medical issues in order to better understand what type of pain therapy was being used. Dr. Warbritton felt an open dialogue would circumvent a lot of inaccurate conclusions Kay has made about her brother’s care.
The complainant said she took photos of medication prescribed by Dr. Warbritton, Attachment 1.
____________________________________________________________
DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION
…show more content…
Warbritton, to patient Paul Faulconer. A medical review of the case was performed by Dr. Cupp who submitted several follow-up questions. Dr. Warbritton also responded to this complaint in writing, indicating that Mr. Faulconer's healthcare has obviously been very complicated. He has had multiple reasons for pain, and that pain medication has proven to be essential to Faulconer's care. Warbritton denied prescribing Oxycodone to Faulconer, even though this was suggested by the complainant who he claims has not had much, if any, dealings with Faulconer’s medical
Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed.
The following is a summary of a case review addressed in a meeting held on August 14, 2015. After reviewing several applications for licensure, Dr. Weschler, the
The issue is whether the Wyeth held responsible or not for the Levine injury? Congress did not explicitly expect for the FDCA to preempt state common law tort claims, and as for prescription drugs, state tort law cases proposal an extra imperative layer of consumer assurance that matches, and does not hinder, FDA regulation. The resolution of this issue relies on whether the Wyeth held responsible for the Levine injury. Levine claims that Wyeth drug’s labeling specified many warnings about IV push, but did not contraindicate the technique.
Arrested after 36 patients died, Narendra Nagareddy had been held at his office following a raid from DEA agent. Around 12 of the 36 patients died from an overdose. Almost 40 federal and local agents raided his Jonesboro office as they seized even more assets at his home. As a psychiatrist of Jonesboro, Nagareddy has been over prescribing benzodiazepine and opiates for the last several years, which has led to multiple overdoses and deaths. People have come to Nagareddy for help, but instead of receiving help, they are met with deadly consequences.
Fifteen year old Lewis Blackman died after a minimally invasive surgery. The cause of death was due to perforated bowel caused by ketorolac, a highly potent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory to treat pain and inflammation and for its potential for stomach ulceration. As I read the case, I noticed the following system failures that lead to this sentinel event. First, ketorolac has a black box warning “not to be used in pediatric patients.” 1 A black box warning is the strictest warning put in the labeling of prescription drugs by the Food and Drug Administration when there is reasonable evidence of an association of a serious hazard with the drug.
DOI: 08/29/2006. Patient is a 57-year-old male bookbinding operator/route salesman who sustained injury when he was startled by a cat while making a delivery and fell. Per OMNI, he was initially diagnosed with lumbar herniated disk. The patient is currently temporary totally disabled due to knee surgery in April 2013. Based on the progress report dated 03/21/16, the patient reports that his low back pain tweaked again, after making the bed.
On December 17, 2014, Plaintiff Howard Rote Jr., an inmate housed at the Western Correction Institution brought suit arising from various incidents during his incarceration at various institution within the Department of Public and Correctional Services. ECF Document 1. Mr. Rote’s complaint alleged a myriad of allegations but listed no time frames or dates for any of the allegations. In an effort to gain clarity regarding Mr. Rote’s complaint, undersigned counsel (herein after “State Defendant’s Counsel”) filed a Motion for More Definite Statement. ECF Document 10.
On addition, had to pay the ACCC’s costs. Primary stakeholders: o Health professionals and buyers who have been informing and guiding parents and children on responsible use of the medication would affected the most. The Specific pain case would have resulted in losing trustworthiness and honesty between the health professionals and the patients. The buyers in situation would have lost faith in the company and might prefer choosing another brand.
Because there would be no way to to prove that the patient was in pain or not because pain is not what something others can feel too since one pain for one person can feel almost like nothing while it is the worst pain for someone else. The next question that arose was what if the patient was truly in pain, but the doctors neglected to give him the medication necessary because he was black and seemed like he was a drug addict. If medications were not given to the patient while they were truly in pain, Dr. Davis would have been sued. When Dr. Davis thought these, it completely slipped my mind that patients are able to come to hospitals constantly because of their disorder to get drugs even if they fake the
In order for hospital staff to prevent him from becoming harmful to him and others, the treatment team would give him Proxlin Decanoate, an injectable long-acting drug to help him calm down. Rennie went to federal district court to prevent the hospital from giving him any psychotropic medications in the absence of an emergency. Contention of the Parties: The district court denied the violation of the petitioner’s constitutional right to refuse treatment. The court also issued a preliminary injunction directing New Jersey to establish an independent review process that went beyond the procedures that were already put into place by the state. Rennie’s complaint charged the defendants with violating a number of his constitutional rights.
The court found the “Defendant's care of Claimant fell below acceptable standards of practice” (Stashenko, 2015). In 2009 a former inmate of the Hawaii corrections department was awarded close to $1 million in damages for an incident in 2003, in which the physician’s failure to give the correct type and dosage of antibiotic for an infection in his scrotum. This resulted in 6 subsequent surgeries and the removal of his scrotum, rendering him
This patient was not treated with the ethical respectany patient should receive when seeking help/treatment. It is very alarming that a physician whose job is to take care of other humans would disregard giving a proper
On the final visit, the Complaint says, he was given 120 pills of Oxycodone, even though had been discharged from a mental health and addiction treatment facility three days before. He had spent a week as an inpatient for anxiety and panic
It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.
Missed identification of shock symptoms in Ms. Gadner 2. IV infiltration being missed resulting in her not receiving fluid ordered 3. “Scanty documentation” depriving the physician of information on Ms. Gadner’s current condition 4. Administration of valium and morphine, contraindicated in shock, nursing not questioning the order 5. Didn’t communicate need for transfer to Dr. Dick.