Usually paper is not very important in ones life, but it is a main role in Dirt Road Home for many reasons. The main reasons paper played such a big role is that it represented lies, reality, and freedom. These three things were emphasized throughout the book to show the importance of paper. In many ways the guards and Mr. Fraley lied about the boys in hellenwieler by wrighting down things that were not proven true. "He set the shiv on his desk and opened my jacket and wrote something on it,"(125) Mr. Fraley said to Hal while he was denying everything Mr. Fraley said. This proves that the people at Hellenwieler didn't care what really happened to them , but they did care about keeping the boys off of the streets. Also lies were put down about the boys medical records by the guards signed by Mr. Fraley. These are examples of the many lies written down on paper by the people that worked at hellenwieler. …show more content…
This was the only reality Hal faced because he was stuck inside walls with all kinds of bad people that he didn't even know. When he was in his sell he grabbed his paper and pencil and started wrighting, " Dear Carla,"(47) because that was the only thing he wanted to do. He just wanted to stay in touch with Carla and his dad. The whole story includes people always getting into fights and getting hurt, while Hal was in there he encountered a fight against Leroy. Though it was not much of a fight because Hal didn't fight back, Hal was hurt pretty bad and had to go into the infirmary. " I lay there while she changed the bandages on my face and made notes on a clipboard."(57) This makes Hal think of a way out of Hellenwieler because of the clipboard the nurse filled out about him. Without the paper on Paco's injuries Hal would've never been freed from the kids
" Someone who survived such an attack would be able to provide some sort of witness testimony. When the Sergeant doesn 't seem to be frightened by these details and remains on watch, the Man tries another rhetorical route.
The paper thin book was about a 12 year old boy, Mick Harte, who lived to the fullest as his older sister Phoebe would say, but unfortunately died because of a bicycle accident. Living life to the fullest meant not wearing a helmet, and which could of prevented him from dying so now Phoebe, our
Meyer witnessed a Nazi guard kill his brother by striking him with a wooden plank repeatedly. Meyer lied to the Nazi guards at Auschwitz and told them that he was a tailor and he was then moved to the clothing chamber. There he had access to all the jewelry and belongings that the Nazis confiscated from the prisoners. He took the jewelry with him on death marches to the Dachau camp, where he escaped into the forest until
However they chose to believe that it was simply a lie that was being told with someone that had lost their mind. Soon after, they realized the mistake that they had made. They were packed up into carts and taken to concentration camps, where some were killed and others were worked to death. The conditions of the cart were awful, there were barely any room to stand, let alone sleep and many of the Jews were losing their minds. They had no clue how much worse it would get once they arrived to the camps.
“The way the sunlight came around him and lifted him up and sucked him high into a tree full of moss and vines and white blossoms [67]” The way he said that made the readers think if it was true or more of “it happened so fast and I don’t want to remember it so I’m going to make up things “or more of an exaggeration. ‘’ in many cases a true war story cannot be believed if you believe it be skeptical. It’s a question of credibility. Often the crazy stuff is true and the normal stuff isn’t because the normal is necessary to make you believe the truly
Terms such as “The Guilty, Guilty, murd’rer walks abroad… MURD’RER !” (Frederick 4.2). The soldiers involved were tried and convicted; however, only given token punishments (Brinkley 97). This propaganda did not address the rational or evaluate the justification for the killing of the five that perished in the event. The purpose of this article was to incite the masses and further shift the opinions of the populous.
Readers have to read the whole selection to get to it and in the end it leaves them with a challenge. Good Old Dirt by David Montgomery appeals to most readers. He sets up this selection to relate to both a reader’s pathos and logos. As well as calls the reader to take action and trys to get them involved.
The despicable actions that occurred in concentration camps heavily influence how readers interpret their
The husband of one of the Hoss children says that, “She was as much a victim as anybody else. She was just a child when this happened” (Harding 15). The Hoss children were all young when their father was a Nazi, and they were not given the full story. One of the children says that she always thought that her father was an excellent person, and he gave no indication of being capable of the horrible crimes he committed. Even after the war, their mother stayed silent about their father’s crimes, and would not tell the British army where he was.
Hannah and her Heinrich Blücher husband were both escapees and survivors; she had traveled to Jerusalem to witness the Eichmann trials for the New Yorker in 1961. Two factors connect these men and their actions aside from joining the SS. The first factor, both Eichmann and Karl make no excuse their actions and both willing admit to their crimes. The second factor, both said they were following orders, “Eichmann not only followed orders, he obeyed the law” (Arendt, 1963, p. 135) and thus had nothing to do with their personal beliefs, but had a duty to fulfill. Eichmann was an established SS whose only regret in life was that he did not finish his job; Eichmann was in charge of deportation to Auschwitz (Arendt, 1963).
Hitler was a horrible person for the things he did to the Jews and it shouldn’t be forgotten. Then the entire camp, block after block, filed past the hanged boy and stared at his extinguished eyes, the tongue hanging from his gaping mouth. (page 62 and 63) This is crazy Hitler made young innocent teens and older men stare at the young teen being hanged. Then they had to go back to work like it wasn’t that big of a deal and just acted like nothing really happened.
The novel tells a story of an unnamed man and his son in who struggle to survive in this horrific environment. I feel that the language in the novel is verbose. McCarthy is blunt in his descriptions. He uses repeated struggles and similar scenes forcing the reader to share the tough experience of the characters. I agree with the author that The Road is the picture of a post-apocalyptic world.
Telling a true war story can be hard to do, because soldiers are tempted to change some traumatic aspects to make the story easier to comprehend, and not so traumatic for the listener. For the readers who prefer the brutal and gruesome stories,
His friends would pile up sheaves of wheat, and keep a pig in the middle of it. They would hide three Dutchmen each night in a wooden coffin underneath the floor in the barn, putting hay on it, and placed the wagon on the floor. The people whom they hid, had no identification papers, so they could be picked up by the Germans. They also kept the Germans off guard by shooting guns at night. At night in the darkness, they would knock the German soldiers into the canals, and some of them would drown because they could not swim.
“If you showed a driver a green blur, Oh yes! he’d say, that’s grass!” (Bradbury 9). The setting is one of the most unusual and compelling part of the novel, causing readers to want to continue reading to see how it affects the rest of the plot and