Paradigm Essay

Before going in detail of the above important paradigms of research, it is very necessary to have a look on the word “paradigm”.

“A paradigm is a pattern, method or system on which a researcher thinks and precedes his/ her research”.

According to Rossman & Rollis “paradigm is shared understanding of reality”.

It’s a way of thinking and observing. Everyone has his / her own way of observing and interpreting. If a researcher wants to do a research on any topic his point of view will definitely differ from his contemporaries.

“A paradigm is a shared world view that represents the beliefs and values in a discipline and that guides how problems are solved.” (Schwandt, 2001)[1]

According to (Patton, 2002) [2] following are the paradigm conventions:

• Theory can’t be ignored for considering ‘just the facts’. Both theory and practice are inseparable.

• The researcher’s inspirations for and obligation to research are dominant and vital to the initiative

• The impression that research is apprehensive only with correct procedures and steps for gathering and classifying information is now insufficient.

Research methods used in post- positivist approach is observation and experimentation. iii. Interpretivism:

This research approach is beyond the reality and truth. It deals with the overall world view regarding each problem. It is not only to find out what the truth is but to have a critical look and bird’s eye view.

It is to put yourself in others shoes and then see the perspective and this process is known as ‘VERSTEHEN’. It claims that people have their own choices and they have full liberty to express their point of view. It is totally subjective based approach. Peoples’ choices have no concerned and connection with the science laws or nature. This theory has a high validity due to a true world’s presentation. It is an utmost duty of an interpretivist to take care of peoples’ differences. Many interpretations are part and parcel of this thought. It is

if a research is to be conducted to assess the effect of thesis workshop on development of research skills among students at M. Phil level. Both qualitative and quantitative study would be done. As the research will be carried out on the effect of workshop means two variables are involved in it. The one is independent i.e. thesis workshop and the other dependent variable is students’ development. Causal comparative research will be held to find out the effect. In this type of research a researcher wants to determine the cause or consequences of differences that already exist between or among groups of individuals. As the workshop is being carried out on annual basis for the M. Phil students so it’s an independent variable. We can’t manipulate it. On the other hand the development of the research skills can be changed accordingly each year. The research can be carried out by following