In William Faulkner’s novel As I Lay Dying, Faulkner analyses the bonds between family members and the effects of parenting. The parenting styles in which Faulkner is scrutinizing is the difference in behaviors- of a parent- which can change the overall outcome of the child’s behavior. He expresses this in the way he displays how Addie Bundren treats her children differently from one another. The parenting styles illustrated by Addie Bundren are shown to affect children negatively, by sculpting their sanity, personality, and behavior according to the differences in parenting.
Since Addie Bundren very obviously exhibits her favoritism towards Jewel, the sanity of Darl is put on the line. Darl is out casted by his mother and she does not treat
…show more content…
Jewel’s personality is often very stoic and brooding, he also tends to stay away from his other family members and this is all due to Addie’s unintentional affect she has on her children. Addie was a very antisocial character and decidedly did not like to keep the company of the family that reminded her of her loveless marriage, so naturally Jewels attitude towards his family is aloof. He takes on the personality and attitude of his mother. Darl even points out Jewels distant behavior when he questions Jewel with, “who was your father, Jewel”, Faulkner is expressing how a mothers favoritism towards their children can make them become distant from the other family members and cause a rift between siblings and other family members alike. It can also be the cause of broken relationships between these children when the mother exhibits inadequate relationships of her own. The child, psychologically, will not be able to relate to people and will not be able to maintain a stable relationship of any kind and cause the child, when they become an adult, to be very lonely. Now because Darl was neglected by his mother, His personality was more forthcoming and friendly. Darl was far more social and outgoing, which is an attractive personality trait to most people, “ Darl was different from those others… he was the only one of them that had… any natural affection” (Faulkner 21). His natural …show more content…
Jewel is not a man of many words but he does tend to show his affections in the things he will do for people as do some of the other brothers, like Cash, who spends his mother’s last moments alive making her a casket outside her bedroom window. This was Cash’s way of telling his mother that he loved her and that he would make sure that her last dying wish to be buried with her family would be fulfilled. Addie’s lack of communication translated to her sons and they found it hard to communicate with her or anyone else. Jewel seems to have personified and has exhibited his mother’s preference for actions over words when he continuously saves his mother’s dead body from floods and fires with no regards to his own life. Jewel “does not love in word, neither in tongue, but in deed and in truth”, Faulkner’s idea is that Jewels behavior is solely due to the fact that his mother never really outwardly gave any of her children compassion so Jewel picked up on this and continued to keep up with this behavior (1 John 3:18). Darl’s behaviors on the other hand are quite selfish and only prove to be for the benefit of himself and his own self gain. Darl wants to have all the attention that he does not get from his mother to be solely on him and no one else. Faulkner’s reasoning behind the very different behaviors of these two brothers is to express the very extent in which the
After Addie’s sudden death, young Vardaman struggled to come to terms with his mother’s death. In a grief-stricken haze, Vardaman convinces himself that his “mother is a fish” (84). Instead of explaining what death is to Vardaman in a manner suited for a child, Darl feeds into Vardaman’s delusions asserting that “Jewel’s mother is a horse” (101). By allowing Vardaman to utilize an unhealthy coping mechanism and going further to use Vardaman’s deluded logic, Darl reveals his lack of care for his youngest brother. Although Darl may not be maliciously allowing this delusion, it is still representative of his unstable mental state creating problems for other characters in the novel.
However, Darl constantly expresses his love for her. This doesn’t matter to Addie though. Jewel is her favorite child despite the affection she receives from Darl. After calling his own mother a fish and realizing that Jewel’s mother is a horse, Vardaman asks “Then what is your ma, Darl?” Darl responds with “I haven’t got ere one.”
While Vardaman observes Jewel’s decision on taking the horse instead of riding the wagon with the family to Jefferson to bury their dead mother; he finds himself discussing Jewel, Darl, and himself’s identity. The distinct metaphors apply on Vardaman’s mother and Jewel’s mother and subtle stylistic placement of sentences present that Jewel actually isn’t a part of the Bundren family, according to Darl. At the moment where Vardaman thinks his mother is a fish again, Darl breaks into his thought: But my mother is a fish. Vernon seen it.
(Faulkner 151) Then when Tull’s view is read, we learn that Darl left Cash to secure Addie for himself and abandoned their dead mother for his own sake (Faulkner 152). This act of deserting Addie shows that Darl could care less about Addie and more about himself. In the aftermath, Jewell, along with the rest of the family, goes downriver in passionate pursuit of the casket. This showed Darl that even after Addie’s death, he still feels as if his situation is only getting worse because Jewell’s bond is
He cares for his mother and for his brother. While the relationship between Darl and Jewel is a strained one, Darl aims to help Jewel come to terms with the fate of his mother’s health. Darl later questions Jewel about who his father is, as he knows that Anse is not his real father. Upon arriving at the Gillespie farm, Darl taunts Jewel by asking him, “Whose son are you?” (Faulkner 212).
In the novel, As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner shapes the plot based on the looming presence of the absentee protagonist, Addie Bundren. The reader’s knowledge of Addie accumulates through the monologues of other characters, so the reader gains only bits and pieces of Addie’s character. However, after her death, the reader obtains a better understanding of Addie’s voice through her own monologue and as a result, is characterized as cold and selfish. Through the use of similes and interior monologue, Faulkner shows Addie’s tendency to detach herself from the people in her life, which relates to the novel’s overall theme of solitude as Addie adheres to her father’s philosophy that the reason for living is no more than “to get ready to stay dead a long time” (169).
Miss Emily Grierson, the legend honor of the story “A Rose for Emily," is an outré character. Taciturn from the community, confined in a bittersweet world of misunderstanding, Emily never garner any psychiatric therapy, but she reveals indications of different signs for her cerebral sickness. By inspect Emily’s conduct and her public relationships, it is plausible to determine Emily’s intellectual ailment. While her circle never viewed Emily as insane she was an extremely sick person. Whenever you're experiencing difficulty identifying signs of rational sickness in Miss Emily, this psychological nature scrutiny of Emily will be totally useful.
Religion in As I Lay Dying The time and setting during which the novel was written are very important for understanding William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying. This novel was written in 1930 Mississippi; during this time Mississippi was very religious. Unsurprisingly, Christianity and religion also plays a big role in As I Lay Dying particularly through imagery and symbolism that connects different characters to religious figures, including Jesus Christ.
The family's treacherous journey to Jefferson is filled with danger and excitement, yet Faulkner gives many doses of humor throughout the novel. The characters employ themselves in outrageous acts of irony, from Addie's rejection of her most devoted son, to Anse's concern with his false teeth instead of Addie's death, to Vardaman's calling his mother a fish. This irony would not have been evident if it were not for Faulkner's use of multiple narrators. Faulkner was enchanted by Freudian theories of psychology when he wrote this novel, and recounting the story through various perspectives allows the reader to understand each character's reaction. This enhanced the dark humor throughout the novel because the reader can see into each family member's thoughts on her death.
One of the universal themes of literature is the idea that children suffer because of the mistakes of an earlier generation. The novel "Their Eyes Were Watching God" follows the story of Janie Mae Crawford through her childhood, her turbulent and passionate relationships, and her rejection of the status quo and through correlation of Nanny 's life and Janie 's problems, Hurston develops the theme of children 's tribulations stemming from the teachings and thoughts of an earlier generation. Nanny made a fatal mistake in forcibly pushing her own conclusions about life, based primarily on her own experiences, onto her granddaughter Janie and the cost of the mistake was negatively affecting her relationship with Janie. Nanny lived a hard life and she made a rough conclusion about how to survive in the world for her granddaughter, provoked by fear. " Ah can’t die easy thinkin’ maybe de menfolks white or black is makin’ a spit cup outa you: Have some sympathy fuh me.
He manifests his trauma by speaking in the third person, repeating, “Darl is our brother, our brother Darl” (Faulkner 254). His strength as a reliable narrator in his earlier monologues of the novel stems from his capacity to separate himself from those whom he speaks about. As he mulls over his betrayal, he loses his identity. Once an intelligent, articulate man, Darl has now become traumatized. Darl is fortuitous to leave his past with the Bundren family behind, even if leaving the family means entering a mental
As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner In the excerpt from William Faulkner’s Southern novel, As I Lay Dying the author structures his novel through the use of literary features such as allusion, similes a belittling yet humorous tone, concrete imagery and a stream of consciousness style in the passage. Faulkner throughout the passage not only describes Cash’s reserved character and Darls perspective imagination but he also foreshadows the struggle the Bundren’s will go through as they prepare to go on the journey of burying Addie. First, Faulkner has the speaker Darl create a gloomy mood by using similes to display the ambiance in the room. Then Faulkner alludes to the bible and uses concrete imagery to illustrate both the surroundings and Cash’s concentration and determination as he makes his mother’s coffin.
In the novel, As I lay dying by William Faulkner, the Bundren family go through a mental journey of loss and death of their mother later to go on a physical journey to bury their mother. To the conclusion of any novel, many have an opinion on what is much happy or not a happy ending. In the case of the ending to As I lay dying, include no real burial of how the mother wanted, which was the point of the physical journey in the first place, secrets comes out, one of the five the siblings gets taken away, and many are left with unfinished business, was not a happy at all for most of the characters. The novel is narrated by 15 characters that are not all part of the Bundren family but in some way connected.
Faulkner’s choice of Vanderman, the most prominent symbol of innocence, to approach Darl allows the readers to have the perspective of an innocent child. Vanderman believed that Darl was weeping because he almost lost Addie’s coffin. However, differing viewpoints explain that Darl was weeping because his attempt at putting Addie to rest had failed. His tears are shed as an apology to Addie for his failure.
Throughout history, there has always been a fracture between those of different social castes. Whereas these minute differences may at first seem inconsequential, they inevitably lead to a large division within the society. A prime example of this is the three-tiered system that was in place in pre-Napoleonic France. In this system, France was divided into those of the clergy, the nobility, and the peasantry, creating one of the most prominent class divisions in modern history.