ipl-logo

Parfit's Argumentative Analysis

667 Words3 Pages

Parfit creates a situation where future travel to Mars has been revolutionized by teleportation. In his situation the individual in question has traveled to Mars before the traditional way, by spaceship. The commuter is considering using teleportation to travel to his job on Mars because the risk and length of the spaceship. Parfit’s version of simple teleportation includes the commuter being unconscious for an hour and receiving a full body scan. The full body scan copies the commuters entire body cell by cell in order to make the replica of the commuter have the same brain and body as the commuter. Then by radio waves the commuter’s information is sent to Mars at the speed of light. After the teleportation the individual teleported wakes up on Mars with the same body and all of old memories. In Parfit’s example simple teleportation becomes a normal occurrence. Based on Parfit’s version of simple teleporter I would use …show more content…

Due to the fact the Descartes believes that the soul is not physical, the scan and radio transmission presents no harm. If the scan is purely physical and the person’s characteristics and personality do not change then there is no indication that the person’s identity has changed. As for Locke’s view on personal identity the person’s memories and experiences are the same as when they were on Earth. The hour lost is as minuscule as an hour nap when it comes to who a person is and what they identify as. Parfit indicates that the commuter mentioned remembers breakfast and cutting his face when he wakes up. By Locke’s the commuter is the same personality wise. Even if a non – teleportation travel supporter mentions a complication in radio transport or a change of identity due to teleportation it still outweighs the risk and time of space travel via

Show More
Related

  • PSA Argumentative Analysis

    391 Words  | 2 Pages

    The authors of this journal discuss the healthcare systems cutbacks and its impact on the population. Every few years the Ontario government and the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) negotiate their contract called The Physician Services Agreement (PSA) The contract details how much physicians can bill for their services, as well as where health care funding should be invested in or where a cut back could be. In March of 2014, the contract had expired, which has led to negotiations for over the year. Over that year negotiations for the new PSA contract had many conflicts mostly due to the government’s goal try to end the province's deficit by 2017-2018.

    Read More

  • Nora Rodriguez Argumentative Analysis

    67 Words  | 1 Pages

    Nora Rodriguez is ahero because she helps immigrants with their immigration paper work. The article states that "a honduran women runs a business helping central americans with thier immagration paper work. Also she is a hero because she spoke up for the people about thier injusties. The article says that "she has gone from simply providing a support service to demmanding change regarding the injustes and discrimination.

    Read More

  • NT Wright Argumentative Analysis

    302 Words  | 2 Pages

    I found it interesting that NT Wright was clarifying the differences between God’s wrath and penal substitution with reform theologian Thomas Schreiner in this video. I was a little unsure, but this video affirmed my understanding that NT Wright was a unique blend of sweet and sour flavors enhanced by hot and spicy pepper that Thomas Schreiner was hot for him to take in. I agree with NT Wright argument the wrath of God. Why? Because Wright says that the cross was about much more than Jesus absolving us of sin.

    Read More

  • Olaudah Equiano Argumentative Analysis

    64 Words  | 1 Pages

    Olaudah Equiano made this plea. His point in saying this was to call out the people who claimed that they were Christians for their treatment of others. He is saying that if they are truly Christians they should not be treating other people in this way since God said that we should treat others the way that we would personally want to be treated.

    Read More

  • Proslavery Argument Analysis

    123 Words  | 1 Pages

    During the mid 1800s, the pro-slavery argument was at its strongest. The Proslavery Argument by Boundless, an online textbook, discusses the famous Mudsill Speech of James Henry Hammond which stated that the pro-slavery political argument, an ideology that defended a class-sensitive view of American antebellum society. He believed that many past societies carried the burden of the existence of a class of landless poor. Continually, other southern pro-slavery theorists felt that this class of landless poor was “inherently transient and easily manipulated, and as such often destabilized society as a whole” (Boundless). Thus, the greatest threat to democracy was seen as coming from “class warfare that destabilized a nation's economy, society and

    Read More

  • Squanto's Argumentative Analysis

    280 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the year 1620, over a hundred people were at the end of their tolerance for having a religion forced upon them. These people set off from England in search of a land where they could escape religious persecution. This trip was to be by boat, going across some of the most dangerous waters. Many people died before they reached what was then called Cape Cod. Once on the land, they faced more hardships.

    Read More

  • The Great Spirit Argumentative Analysis

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Driven by the belief that space was bequeathed to them, the Native Americans feel justified in defending their land against the growing encroachment of the white man as the American landscape unfolds. Their motive is the premise that a higher authority has granted them the right to the space, and that the Great Spirit has created the landscape exclusively for them. Fueled by the formation of conflict over land, the Great Ottawa Chief, Pontiac, in his speech at Detroit, seeks to persuade the tribes, including the Ottawa, Huron, and Pottawatomi to agree to resistance. Invoking the words of the Delaware prophet, Neolin, Pontiac recounts the vision which he believes justifies resistance. Neolin urges the tribes to sever all relations to the customs

    Read More

  • Argumentative Analysis: Metelanski

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    Metelanski 2 lied about the scores and then he apologized but in reality he meant to do it because as he stated it “It was for extra credit”. Robert’s point of view on this research was simply “trolling” the people that he did the reasearch on about their “IQ” testing. Later in the story he also gives the test to his Mom and Dad and little did you know he lied to them about the test scores as well. Once again in my opinion Robert’s research did not bring any ethical value to the point of even doing that research. He tested multiple people basically lying to them about their scores and taking advantage of people in order to get extra credit for his “How to be a cop” class.

    Read More

  • Abortion By James R. Kelly And Katha Pollitt

    1788 Words  | 8 Pages

    Although first documented in 1848, the issue of women’s rights has existed since the presence of the female body (Smiltneek).Whether that event is accredited to Godly creation or evolution, the specifics are irrelevant when it comes to a pressing and highly controversial issue: abortion. Being medically defined as “the premature exit of the products of conception (the fetus, fetal membranes, and placenta) from the uterus,” abortion is one of the most divisive issues in present day discussion (Abortion). James R. Kelly and Katha Pollitt each recognize abortion as both a powerful and sensitive issue. In their respective articles they address the challenges of the pro-life and pro-choice, two contradictory issues currently receiving political

    Read More

  • Nancy Fraser Argumentative Analysis

    87 Words  | 1 Pages

    When arguing that emancipatory movements have been plagued by an antinomy between a politics of ‘redistribution’ and a politics of ‘recognition’, Nancy Fraser is specifically referring to the manner by which cultural recognition displaces socioeconomic redistribution as a remedy for injustice and the goal for political struggle. In order to thoroughly investigate this dilemma Fraser analytically distinguishes the different logics behind ‘redistribution’ and ‘recognition’, while situating them into current political predicaments. From her extensive analysis Fraser proposes two broad remedies that can cut across the redistribution-reconstruction divide.

    Read More

  • Windshuttle Argumentative Analysis

    190 Words  | 1 Pages

    Another one of Robert Maine arguments was that Windshuttle claimed that the 20,000 deaths of the Aboriginals did not happened because it was not documented. Although Windshuttle argument of the Aboriginals being illiterate and not keeping any written records does not mean there history did not happen. ‘They responded to violence by the Aborigines towards white settlers cautiously and reluctantly, and their overriding concern was to prevent retaliatory violence by settlers and convicts from getting out of hand.’ That was one of Windshuttle argument that the only reason the white people killed Aboriginals was in retaliation, but all aboriginals on Tasmania were killed which is also know as a genocide. The white settlers were on a mission to kill

    Read More

  • Mr. Michelson's Argumentative Analysis

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    Objections that the prosecution and/or defense should have been made. On page 1, line 22 the objection would be that under Federal Rule of Evidence Rules 405(a) and 608(a). There can only be testimony as to a point of view or the character and not testimony in support of the point of view. Leading to the questioning of the witness to his point of view, of his reputation is the witness' statement of the point of view that is not permitted. On page 2, lines 12 and 13 with reference to the statement of the witness with respect to Mr. Michelson's “reputation is very good in the community...who will never start an argument and never hold a grudge against anyone”; Federal Rule of Evidence Rules 405(a) and 608(a).

    Read More

  • Webster's Essay On Property Vs Freedom

    132 Words  | 1 Pages

    Webster states that equal land distribution is more important to freedom, than free speech, trial by jury, or other rights, because “wherever we cast our eyes, we see this truth, that property is the basis of power; and this, being established as a cardinal point, directs us to the means of preserving our freedom.” (111) With this statement, Webster presents the people with the idea, that free speech, trial by jury, and other rights does not present the same significance of power or freedom, that owning property does. Therefore, people should be fighting for laws, which abolish the right to inherit land, rather than the right to speak freely. Once one accumulates enough land, they hold the power to freely express the rights, which are referred

    Read More

  • Seibert's Argumentative Analysis

    414 Words  | 2 Pages

    In chapter seven, Seibert offers a suggestion to read the Joshua 6-11 account from the perspective of the Canaanites. This argument became a view changer for me and I find it helpful for reading scripture through a suffering lens, in spite of always reading from the viewpoint of the conquers. As an African American, who always had the privilege of reading African American history from the perspective of the slave, Seibert in this section suggest that all should read virtuous violence from the perspective of the suffering. It is important that when viewing scriptures of violence, one must first remember that those included are human. I find this argument by Seibert extremely helpful and transformative, because it will forever remind me that

    Read More

  • Liberal Arts Argumentative Analysis

    991 Words  | 4 Pages

    With the year-round pressure pertaining to college applications on high school seniors follows the impending decision of choosing an appropriate college major. Generally, the decision-making process involves prioritizing one field of interest over another, however, due to globalization and constant innovation in technology determining a college major has increasingly become the modern day equivalent of the metaphorical line between life and death. Even so, the obvious choice would be the prestigious STEM fields over liberal arts due to the instant job opportunities which are seemingly ludicrous to a recent graduate. Nevertheless, liberal arts education should be encouraged to be pursued at higher education institutions in USA because it helps

    Read More

More about Parfit's Argumentative Analysis

Open Document