Parmenides Argument On Change
Contemplating the arguments of Aristotle and Parmenides on the topic of change is interesting because, even though Aristotle is clearly being nitpicky about the way Parmenides’ argument is presented and obviously doesn’t agree with what Parmenides is saying fully, Aristotle still finds aspects of Parmenides’ argument to be true to what he believes. This is shown in their arguments as Parmenides arguing against any form of change (because it doesn’t make sense) and Aristotle arguing for certain types of change.
At the base of Parmenides’ argument against change is that:
1. It is impossible to think of what is-not.
2. The concept of generation (coming-into-being) makes sense only if one can think what is-not.
3. Therefore, the concept of generation
…show more content…
Therefore, the concept of change does not make sense.
So the main idea of this argument is that: if something comes to be then it is clearly a being and clearly is. Then what does this being come to be from? For this Parmenides offers us two solutions, either what is or what is not. However if the original thing is what is, and the resulting being is also what is, then nothing has actually come into being and so therefor no change has occurred. Carrying on with this point brings us to the idea of if the original thing is what is not, then according to Parmenides himself this is an impossibility because “nothing comes from nothingness.”
“The first of those who studied philosophy were misled in their search for truth and the nature of things by their inexperience, which as it were thrust them into another path. So they say that none of the things that are either comes to be or passes out of existence, because what comes to be must do so either from what is or from what is not, both of which are impossible. For what is cannot come to be (because it is already), and from what is not nothing could have come to be (because something must be underlying).” (Aristotle 191a25)
And at the base of Aristotle’s response to Parmenides’ argument are two
The Hero's Journey-Personal Narrative
591 Words | 3 Pages’s. He thought to himself, “God…is this all there is?” He pictured creation in his mind. How God create, of all worlds, his world.
The Sweatshop Sublime Summary
817 Words | 4 PagesWhat seems special about this passage is a third realization: that this moment of consciousness will not be converted into
Sign Here If You Exist Analysis
566 Words | 3 PagesResponse Paper Change is inevitable. Therefore, every human being is bound to experience change whether he or she likes it or not. Different events wield great influence so powerful that it could shift the course of an individual’s lives. An example of such paradigm shifts are depicted by both Quinn and Pollack in their literary pieces “Sign Here if You Exist” and “Pigeons” respectively.
Thomas Nagel's Death
918 Words | 4 PagesHe then offers a response to each of these problems. For the first, he states that good or bad things that happen to people do not always occur in their present state and therefore just because they do not directly experience it, it can still affect the person. He then objects to the second problem by saying that even though the person that died did not survive, they can still experience misfortune because if they did not die they would have continued to enjoy their life before their death. Lastly, he objects the third problem and explains that the period of nonexistence before birth does not deprive us of anything as death deprives us of the time we could have been living. He clearly shows that there is a difference between these two periods of nonexistence.
Descartes Sixth Meditation Analysis
1919 Words | 8 PagesConclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
Glg 101 Week 4 Assignment
613 Words | 3 PagesMy Thoughts Exercise: Assignment #7 Anaïs Nin On Truth and Reality 1. Page 206. “The change came from within; it was a force which could solve conflicts and dualities.”
John Locke's Argument For The Existence Of God
732 Words | 3 PagesThis premise needs further justification for it to be correct. The term “bare nothing” does not cancel out that explanation that nature could have the power to produce another being. Locke responded explaining that nature is the first beginning and every beginning was produced by something else. An eternal being was the reason why the explosion of nature started our world and further produced all of
Cogito In The Second Meditation By Rene Descartes
1275 Words | 6 PagesIn the second meditation, Descartes uses this cogito of consciousness and existence to assume that the mind is distant from a body. “I am, I exist”. This essay I will clearly discuss an outline of Descartes cogito in the second meditation and how it deals with the subject of existence and also Descartes’s strongest and weakest arguments in this case. “The Meditation of yesterday filled my mind with so many doubts that it is no longer in my power to
Analyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno
1060 Words | 5 PagesThe world we live in is filled with crime, evil, and injustice, but do people have the desire to do bad things knowing that they are bad, or do they do them thinking that they are good? In this essay, I examine Socrates argument, found in Plato’s Meno, that no one knowingly desires bad things. If Socrates were right, it would mean that it is impossible for someone to perform a bad action based on their desire for that bad thing. Instead, all bad desires result from the ignorance of the person performing the action in falsely believing that the action is good. Though Socrates presents a compelling argument, I argue that it is possible for someone to act badly, all the while knowing that what they desire is bad.
Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis
726 Words | 3 PagesWe know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct
Descartes Cogito Argument Analysis
884 Words | 4 PagesThrough our understanding we can come to learn that the existence of conscious self is not enough to support the claim of a thinking thing, and that he solely exists on the basis of thinking and being a thing being. And so the mediators claim that “ I exist as a thinking thing,” is correct as it can be supported with evidence throughout our
Essay On Aristotle's Theory Of Natural Slavery
991 Words | 4 PagesI will argue that even with the evidence provided, Aristotle’s theory on
George Orwell's The Essence Of Being Human?
1517 Words | 7 PagesEverything brought into this world exists and takes up space, these things have their own reason for existence. These reasons are also a part of their essence. The basic nature of a thing defines the word “essence”, it is also the quality that makes something what it is. The famous author George Orwell said: “The essence of being human is that one does not seek perfection, that one is sometimes willing to commit sins for the sake of loyalty, that one does not push asceticism to the point where it makes friendly intercourse impossible, and that one is prepared in the end to be defeated and broken up by life, which is the inevitable price of fastening one’s love upon other human individuals”. This saying by George Orwell tells us to be prepared for life’s
The Trinitarian Doctrine Of God
1407 Words | 6 PagesJESUS AND HIS FATHER The key to the Trinitarian doctrine is the Father-Son relationship. In Christian theology, God is symbolised as a divine Father primarily because Christ is symbolised as the divine Son. Not the other way around. The Gospel of Mark describes Jesus as the Son of man and the Son of God.
Dualism And Idealism
857 Words | 4 PagesHere is the same thing that infinite progress expresses: once it is recognized that the finite is not in and for itself, that it is not a self-standing reality, nor an absolute being, but that it is only a passing thing; On the other hand, this is immediately forgotten and the finite is presented only in opposition to the infinite, completely separate from it, and escaped the destruction, as it persists independently for itself. While thinking believes that this way ascends to infinite, it is precisely the opposite; it reaches an infinite that is only finite; and the finite that she just left, she keeps it, giving her an absolute character. If, after the previous consideration of the nullity of the opposition established by the intellect between the finite and the infinite (consideration that can be useful compared to Philebos of Plato), it is easy to fall, and here in the formula that the infinite and the finite are one, that the truth , the true infinity, is determined and expressed as the unity of infinite and finite; such an expression contains something fair, but it is equally wrong and false, as I mentioned earlier about the unity of being and
More about Parmenides Argument On Change
The Hero's Journey-Personal Narrative
591 Words | 3 PagesThe Sweatshop Sublime Summary
817 Words | 4 PagesSign Here If You Exist Analysis
566 Words | 3 PagesThomas Nagel's Death
918 Words | 4 PagesDescartes Sixth Meditation Analysis
1919 Words | 8 PagesGlg 101 Week 4 Assignment
613 Words | 3 PagesJohn Locke's Argument For The Existence Of God
732 Words | 3 PagesCogito In The Second Meditation By Rene Descartes
1275 Words | 6 PagesAnalyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno
1060 Words | 5 PagesDescartes Non Deceive God Analysis
726 Words | 3 PagesDescartes Cogito Argument Analysis
884 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Aristotle's Theory Of Natural Slavery
991 Words | 4 PagesGeorge Orwell's The Essence Of Being Human?
1517 Words | 7 PagesThe Trinitarian Doctrine Of God
1407 Words | 6 PagesDualism And Idealism
857 Words | 4 Pages