Parmenides's Objection Of The Characteristics Of Non-Being
Objection 1: I, Parmenides, state that there is no such thing as change. If change did exist, then the characteristics of being would be incorrect, which they are not. The characteristics of being are it can neither come to be or pass away, unchanging, unmoving, unlimited and one. If a being did change, then this would also go against the idea of being can neither come to be nor pass away. With change, the being would be becoming something else, which therefore would lead to the one being passing away and a new being coming to be, and this simply is impossible. Something cannot come nothing, but if it came from something that already was being, then itself is a contradiction because that thing already exists and is not changing. Rationale: …show more content…
It is impossible for being to change into nothing because the idea of non-being is nonsense. By being I mean what truly is, and by non-being what cannot be. The whole idea of non-being cannot even be thought of because there is no property or characteristics about it and since it cannot even be thought of, the idea of it is false. Being is always true, which means un-being is always false, therefore there can be no such thing as change. Something cannot change into something else, which was previously stated in Objection 1, due to the fact that being does not pass away or come to be. The idea of this goes against the requirements of being and is therefore …show more content…
He fully relied on the idea of the way of reason to account for being and since the way of reason could not explain if change could occur, then Parmenides believed it was false or unreal. Since the way of reason was founded of reason, he believed that to be true, instead of the senses or experience, which was unreliable: “Parmenides warns against what he calls the “belief of mortals”, based entirely on sense-experience; in these, the goddess says “there is no trust.” Rather, one must judge by understanding” (Curd,
Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay
590 Words | 3 PagesAdditionally, the ancient Parmenidean contention of “ex nihilo, nihil fit”, seems impossible to reject. However, Craig argues the first premise out of an A-theory of time, and thus we shall look at a further analysis of the first premise: 1. x begins to exist at t, iff x comes into being at t 2. x comes into being at t iff (i) x exists at t, and the actual world includes no state of affairs in which x exists timelessly, (ii) t is either the first time at which x exists or is seperated from any t* < t at which x existed by an interval during which x does not exist, and (iii) x’s existing at t is a tensed fact (Craig,
How Facts Backfire
1091 Words | 5 PagesThe author explains at the end of the article that there is no solution to the process of being
Immortality In William Rowe's Article, Life After Death
1155 Words | 5 PagesAnd because a soul does not have these characteristics, there is doubt on how it can be considered a person. Rowe also brings up the issue with “something being the same person”, where he points out that there is no evidence to prove this. Philosophers have no way of accepting this until it is proven
Descartes Sixth Meditation Analysis
1919 Words | 8 PagesConclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
John Locke's Argument For The Existence Of God
732 Words | 3 PagesIf man knows his own being, then man knows that bare nothing cannot produce a being 3) Therefore, man knows that bare nothing cannot produce a being (from 1 and 2) 4) If bare nothing cannot produce a being, then there has been an eternal being 5) Therefore, there is an eternal (infinite) being
Analysis Of Clarence Darrow's The Myth Of The Soul
745 Words | 3 PagesIf the soul cannot possibly begin when a person does, when and where else could the event take place? However, Darrow 's argument is impaired by his incongruous application of the term soul. He mentions that the soul is popularly equated with identity, consciousness and memory, but fails to specify whether it is this notion or another that he uses. (42) Presuming, for the sake of moving forward, that it is this definition he himself adopts, it seems directly in conflict with his belief that the soul would exist outside of the physical body. (43) Darrow 's argument lacks a clear explication of his concept of the soul and, furthermore, it presents a confusing, contradictory account of the soul 's nature and
Plato's Views On The Allegory Of The Cave
1377 Words | 6 Pages1) In the allegory of the cave, Plato’s main goal is to illustrate his view of knowledge. A group of prisoners have been chained in a cave their whole lives and all they have ever been exposed to were shadows on the wall and voices of people walking by. The prisoners in the cave represent humans who only pay attention to the physical aspects of the world (sight and sound). Once one of them escapes and sees the blinding light, all he wants is to retreat back to the cave and return to his prior way of living. This shows that Plato believes enlightenment and education are painful, but the pain is necessary for enlightenment and it is worth it.
Argument Of Opposites In Plato's 'Phaedo'
633 Words | 3 PagesIn Plato’s, Phaedo, one of the arguments that Socrates makes for justifying his theory about the soul being immortal is the argument of opposites. The argument of opposites is found from 70c to 72c in the Phaedo. The argument is not logically valid as there are a few fallacies that occur with the definition of opposites with which Socrates defines his argument. This argument ultimately fails at being logically valid as contrary to premise 1, all things that have an opposite do not come from only their opposites. Socrates also does not specify in this argument whether he is referring to the soul dying or the body dying in the final premises.
An Analysis Of René Descartes Mediations On First Philosophy
1654 Words | 7 PagesNotre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).
Descartes's Argument On The Existence Of God
753 Words | 4 PagesIn Meditation 3, the Meditator is creating arguments about the existence of god. This is where Descartes explains different reasons/premises to why god exists. Throughout Meditation 3, Descartes goes back and forth with his arguments arguing one thing then creating a counter argument to it at while still focusing on the main thing which is does god exist. For those wondering whether god does really exist stay tuned into what Descartes says. The premises from the meditation that claim god doesn’t exist are weak and invalid, and fail to give enough evidence to support the thought that god does not exists, which would conclude that God does exist.
Opposing Views On Sartre And The Existence Of God
750 Words | 3 PagesIf “existence precedes essence” in the case of human beings, then something comes out of nothing. An essence is
The Final Argument Of Plato's Phaedo
411 Words | 2 PagesThe final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.
Socrates Argumentative Analysis
1225 Words | 5 PagesIn Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass
Analysis Of Descartes Cogito Argument
862 Words | 4 PagesIn order for his opinions and knowledge not to interfere with his perception, he chose to doubt everything. And so, he even chose to doubt the existence of the physical body and continued to stay
Descartes Cogito Argument Analysis
884 Words | 4 PagesThrough our understanding we can come to learn that the existence of conscious self is not enough to support the claim of a thinking thing, and that he solely exists on the basis of thinking and being a thing being. And so the mediators claim that “ I exist as a thinking thing,” is correct as it can be supported with evidence throughout our
More about Parmenides's Objection Of The Characteristics Of Non-Being
Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay
590 Words | 3 PagesHow Facts Backfire
1091 Words | 5 PagesImmortality In William Rowe's Article, Life After Death
1155 Words | 5 PagesDescartes Sixth Meditation Analysis
1919 Words | 8 PagesJohn Locke's Argument For The Existence Of God
732 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Clarence Darrow's The Myth Of The Soul
745 Words | 3 PagesPlato's Views On The Allegory Of The Cave
1377 Words | 6 PagesArgument Of Opposites In Plato's 'Phaedo'
633 Words | 3 PagesAn Analysis Of René Descartes Mediations On First Philosophy
1654 Words | 7 PagesDescartes's Argument On The Existence Of God
753 Words | 4 PagesOpposing Views On Sartre And The Existence Of God
750 Words | 3 PagesThe Final Argument Of Plato's Phaedo
411 Words | 2 PagesSocrates Argumentative Analysis
1225 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis Of Descartes Cogito Argument
862 Words | 4 PagesDescartes Cogito Argument Analysis
884 Words | 4 Pages