Partisanship
In Ruben Navarrette’s opinion piece in the USA Today, “Don’t be a 100 percent-er”, she discusses the partisanship involved in two major American political issues, guns and abortion. The beliefs of most people of these two political debates mostly coincide with their political party, with Democrats being on the side for gun control and be pro-choice, while Republicans are on the side of less gun control and be pro-life. Navarrette argues that this partisanship, these contrasting views with no grey in between, is fracturing the country, and politics is not about absolutes. She goes on to describe that there are people in the United States, including the author herself, that have beliefs in this grey area, and that going more to the fringes is …show more content…
Most people often feel pressure to support the political party closest to their beliefs, no matter what, and often support their stances, even if it is not exactly what that person believes (Bonotti 158). Another piece of evidence that Navarrette could have brought in is about the benefits of partisanship, and how being partisan has its advantages (Bonotti 158). Going into detail about how “...special advantages due to... position... generates stronger partisan obligations for [partisans].”(Bonotti 158) would have helped to explain to her audience the reasons that partisanship is present in political culture. If Navarrette went into detail about the reasons behind partisanship, and not just share her disdain, it would have created a clearer argument behind her opinion piece, as well a possible solution to the problem she …show more content…
She states that these “...absolutists and ‘100 percent’ers are clueless.”(Navarrette) By making this simple statement, it makes the author sound like she does not respect the opposition to her argument, and dismisses them as people that are not worthy to partake in such a debate. Navarrette does not employ the strategy of disproving the other side’s argument, by stating what that argument is and using evidence to show the illogic behind that argument. With stating this generalization in her piece, Navarette did not show how the opposition’s argument is wrong, but only showed her dismissal to the beliefs of those that are different than
Partisanbuzz: A Short Story
379 Words | 2 PagesA source who wished to remain anonymous retold the story to PartisanBuzz of the events that took place after the highly creative U-haul truck pulled up to the front of the Mepham High school, exposing to the community for the first time the Dean / Football coach 's illicit affair. "When the truck pulled up the students and faculty were stunned, as everyone was reading the story. When Coach Cracco 's black truck came speeding down the street, he slammed on the brakes and jumped out. We were all in shock as he headed toward the u-haul, because we knew this was gonna get crazy" the source told me. When he [Cracco] came storming out of his car, he looked mad as hell, Coach ran to the back of the truck.
Rhetorical Triangles By Mary Ann Shadd Cary
458 Words | 2 PagesIn the first paragraph she stresses the point that her readers need a voice. She makes it seem like a simple necessity with her rhetorical question when she asks, "Is not that plain?" on line 15 after stating the need for a voice in the country. She creates a feeling of urgency when she says, "To be always at the mercy of the demagogue of the hour is neither safe, dutiful, nor in any sense becoming" on lines 10-12. This makes the audience afraid and the feeling that they need a voice now.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Caught In The Middle By Wendell Berry
859 Words | 4 PagesHe also points out differences between liberal and more conservative parties. Through these topics, he informs the reader of his opinions regarding problems in American politics; the equality of people governed and the divide amongst political parties. To begin his discussion, Berry describes how everyone has to pick a side in politics. He discusses the lack of understanding of what it really means to be in a particular party by saying, “It doesn’t matter that neither of these labels signifies much in the way of intellectual
Bipartisan Political Analysis
260 Words | 2 PagesBipartisan political and general public opinion acknowledges that education is an “important to the success of both individuals and nations” (MCEETYA, 2006, p300). The national importance of education is of high significance for all educators and policy makers as seen through the historical development of government policy, procedures and research. Teacher recruitment and retention in rural and remote schools has been an ongoing issue in Australian education with the first attempt to combat the problem made by the Griener government who established the ‘Rural Schools Plan’ in 1988. This plan focused on providing incentives for teachers to work in rural schools, including educational scholarships and upgrading teacher accommodation (Wilkinson,
Culture War The Myth Of A Polarized America Analysis
519 Words | 3 PagesIn the article Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, Morris Fiorina addresses the issue of the illusion of political polarization. Political polarization is the separation of political beliefs into two separate extremes. The main illustration Fiorina uses is the use the electoral map. The electoral map is used to gauge which party won an election or polling.
The Role Of Anti-Party Politics In Modern America
500 Words | 2 PagesIn modern America, rumors of government shutdown, debt, and the seeming inefficiency of the government to make decisive changes has given more credibility to the anti-federalist argument. It seems like so many different opinions and desires makes the successful governing of a large diverse country unrealistic under a republic. Were the anti-federalists right? While it is true that competing interests can lead to inefficient government, it is the purpose of the constitution to reign in these interests and create an effective republic. Through the compromise that arises from party politics in a republic, and ironically through the conflict of interests itself, a republic is actually able successfully govern and provide both stability and liberty for as large amount of people.
Democrats Vs Republicans
587 Words | 3 Pages(This topic will be explained in two parts – Partisanship and antipathy of the Democrats and the Republicans). 1. Even though American politicians have been characteristic of negatively rating their opponents, currently those negative ratings have more than doubled as compared to two decades ago. 2. Deeply negative ratings and the strong dislike of the Democrats and Republicans has risen to alarming levels with each side viewing the opponents’ policies as misguided leading to gridlocks in policy making processes.
Address To Congress On Women's Suffrage Rhetorical Analysis
565 Words | 3 Pages(1) setting the tone for the rest of her speech. Catt’s willingness to speak her thoughts gives her an edge because she believes in this cause, and her passion will shine through. As shown in “The woman's hour has struck.” (3). The Confident tone used by Catt makes it so her
Address To Congress On Women's Suffrage Speech Analysis
715 Words | 3 PagesShe used that logical reasoning to convince Congress and her audience. Throughout the speech, it is believed that Catt uses a thoughtful but defensive
Carrie Chapman Catt Speech Analysis
1071 Words | 5 PagesTo urge the arrogant politicians to pass the women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution, Chapman Catt not only induces fear and culpability in them, but the language she employs also establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures and emulating the politicians’ style of speech. Chapman Catt establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures. Premising from the beginning of her address, she alludes to the cause of the American revolution, and the government’s power coming “from the consent” of the people as the two “fundamental principles” that “anchor” the liberty of the United States (39-40). This aligns her with the American ideals that founded the country. Building on that premise, she continues by
Political Ideologies In The Republican Party
869 Words | 4 PagesThroughout the world we all have different political ideologies, meaning we all have different ideas and values about how the role of government should function. We base these ideas and values from our religious background, culture and our philosophical beliefs. Our country in particular has the luxury of deciding who gets to rule because we are a democracy. The two significant political ideologies that are well known around our country are liberal and conservative philosophies. The two beliefs play an important role in the republican party and democratic party which also shapes our political system.
Political Iagogue Analysis
1434 Words | 6 PagesTo say we live in decisive times is an understatement; we can hardly go a day without hearing about the next big political scandal. No matter what side one stands on one thing is clear: The other side is wrong. It’s a divide that’s been plaguing the nation, but it's easy to understand when considering how each side deals with information. Often, studies suggest, that it comes down to being a case of facts versus feelings. As it happens, there's a term for a leader whose platform is based on stirring up feelings, and the term is demagogue.
Democrats Vs Republicans Essay
1163 Words | 5 PagesRepublicans vs. Democrats When the United States of America was founded, George Washington warned against the formation of political parties. By the time the second election came around there were already two political parties, the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans. These parties eventually turned into the Republican and Democratic parties we have today. While these parties have shifted to become almost polar opposites politically, they still share some common goals.
Political Debates
561 Words | 3 PagesHowever, one key piece that she fails to state in her column is other people’s beliefs that can seem to be contradictory in America. If Navarrette does include others’ perspectives which do fall in the grey area between the fringes, then her argument would have more strength, making it appear that large amounts of Americans do not fully share the ideas that both major political parties have. By only sharing her political beliefs about these two issues, Navarrette merely writes an article about what she feels about partisanship and theses issues, not about how a large number of the country feels about the very same
Political Judgment In Politics
891 Words | 4 PagesJudgment are central not only to humans but also in the field of politics as we cannot escape the need to judge. We exercise the power of judgment in a variety of contexts but whenever making decisions in politics, we particularly use political judgment. When telling what color an object is we make perspective judgment. Telling whether a person is guilty or not is an example of legal judgment. Deciding what is the right thing to do is all about moral judgment.
More about Partisanship
Partisanbuzz: A Short Story
379 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Triangles By Mary Ann Shadd Cary
458 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Caught In The Middle By Wendell Berry
859 Words | 4 PagesBipartisan Political Analysis
260 Words | 2 PagesCulture War The Myth Of A Polarized America Analysis
519 Words | 3 PagesThe Role Of Anti-Party Politics In Modern America
500 Words | 2 PagesDemocrats Vs Republicans
587 Words | 3 PagesAddress To Congress On Women's Suffrage Rhetorical Analysis
565 Words | 3 PagesAddress To Congress On Women's Suffrage Speech Analysis
715 Words | 3 PagesCarrie Chapman Catt Speech Analysis
1071 Words | 5 PagesPolitical Ideologies In The Republican Party
869 Words | 4 PagesPolitical Iagogue Analysis
1434 Words | 6 PagesDemocrats Vs Republicans Essay
1163 Words | 5 PagesPolitical Debates
561 Words | 3 PagesPolitical Judgment In Politics
891 Words | 4 Pages