Authors are criticized constantly; chastised for their employment of literary elements such as allusions, motifs, and word choices. Ernest Gaines has been castigated for the utilization of passive characters in his famous novel, A Lesson Before Dying. His castigation is wrongful simply as a result of the fact that I do not believe his main characters are passive for the entirety of the book. His characters are accused of refusing to fight the injustices surrounding them. While this refusal is apparent throughout his work, Gaines does a commendable job developing a form of aggression in his more passive characters. When Jefferson, a slow-witted black man, is accused of a murder he did not commit and is sentenced to death by execution, his …show more content…
He acts as a hog would because he became obsessed with the idea that he is not a human as his lawyer presented. The first of many visits was infuriating for both Grant and Jefferson. Grant, not wanting to be there in the first place, is annoyed that Jefferson is acting like an animal and not much progress is made. It takes four visits for Grant to understand that what he once thought of as an insurmountable task, is now quite realistic. On this fourth visit, Jefferson is contumacious, but a wall is broken, a milestone reached. Grant explains to Jefferson, “‘[y]ou’re not a hog… You’re a man,’” (Gaines …show more content…
Jefferson has spent the majority of his life working for very little money, doing what people tell him to do. This passive lifestyle works for him until the day of the murder; not having any part in the actual infraction, his non-aggressive personality allows him to be accused and convicted of the horrendous crime. In his last few days, Jefferson spends a lot of time writing in the journal Grant gave to him; something no one, including Grant and Jefferson himself, would have expected. In this journal, Jefferson tells of his surroundings, the noises, people, and food in the jail. He also raises some questions that makes readers question how passive this man might actually be. He asks why poor people suffer more than the rich and why the Lord caters to the whites more than the blacks. He mentions that he believes he is better than what the white men
Grant did his best to teach Jefferson that he had worth and it paid off. “If I ain’t nothing but a hog, how come they just don’t knock me in the head like a hog? Strab me like a hog? More erasing, then: Man walk on two foots; hogs on four hoofs” (220). This quote demonstrates how Grant made a difference in Jefferson’s life and taught him to be a man of self worth.
( Gaines pg: 8) This is a perfect example on how the attorney believes Jefferson is guilty in his case because in the end he gave the jury a mental image for a moment to vision Jefferson being guilty and then comparing the relationship on whether it matters to keep this man alive or not. All the evidence the attorney had to present Jefferson’s defense showed how much of a difference it is to be black rather then white in the
During the chapters 4-6 (pages 24-50), the conflict “man vs. self” was occurring. Grant Wiggins was having a couple conflicts with himself, one of which was whether to visit Jefferson in jail. Grant Wiggins was a school teacher, struggling with the decision whether to stay or escape to another state. Grant is put in an interesting position when his aunt and Miss. Emma, Jefferson’s g-dmother, wants him to visit Jefferson in the cell and educate him.
“Tell nannan I walked,” (Gaines 254) this quote is at the end of the book; this quote shows the change Jefferson has been going through. Jefferson said it to the Preacher. After saying this quote Jefferson walked straight to the chair. This quote is important because the whole story everyone was trying to make him think he was a man and not a “hog.” Him walking straight shows that he is a man and will die as a man, by doing this people might classify him as a hometown hero like Jackie Robinson and Joe
Grant was able to help Jefferson become human again because of the lessons he taught him. Grant was able to convince Jefferson that he was a part of the community, he showed him what it means to be a friend to someone else, and was able to teach him what it means to be a man. This allowed Jefferson to stand up to the white community and show them that their racism cannot degrade him and his community. He also made Miss Emma, Jefferson’s godmother, proud. Grant was not only able to make Jefferson a man again but also a hero to his community.
Benjamin Banneker addresses Thomas Jefferson, arguing that although Jefferson claims to support the Declaration of Independence, which clearly promotes equality to all people, Jefferson is “found guilty” of treating slaves unjustly, encouraging Jefferson to abolish slavery. Banneker asks Jefferson to “look back… on the variety of dangers to which” Jefferson has overcome. Banneker flatters Jefferson with his noble deed of supporting equality, in order to acknowledge his trust and support for Jefferson, building his gratitude so Jefferson will be more likely to take his criticism. Quickly Banneker sheds light on the cutting truth: Jefferson left out a group from equality. Slaves.
They made me come with them. You got to tell the law that Mr. Gropé.” (6). Unfortunately for Jefferson, Mr. Gropé dies. Jefferson goes to trial and is quickly found guilty: “A white man had been killed during a robbery, and though two of the robbers had been killed on the spot, one had been captured, and he, too would have to die” (4).
Eventually Miss Emma wasn 't able to visit Jefferson with Grant because she had fallen ill. However despite Grants contemplation, he continued to go and visit Jefferson. One of the last times that Grant visits Jefferson he notices that Jefferson had been writing in a journal when he sat down to read it he saw that Jefferson had written “If I ain 't nothing but a hog, how come they just don 't knock me in the head like a hog? Stab me like a hog?...
Jefferson is in pretty rough shape the first few times Grant visits him. Jefferson flat out told Grant, “‘That’s for youmans,” he said. “I ain't no youman’” (139). At first, it really seems that Grant is getting nowhere with Jefferson.
In Chapter 3 of A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki, he attempts to understand the hidden origins of slavery. In this essay, I will describe and analyze how Takaki uses race, ethnicity, historical events, and famous people to have a better understanding of slavery. We know that slavery itself is a system where an individual owns, buys, or sells another individual. The Irish served as indentured servants, not just blacks, but as time passed slavery consisted of just African Americans.
The most impactful portion of class thus far, has been the discussion regarding Thomas Jefferson and his often contradictory positions regarding his racial ideologies. Thomas Jefferson, has gained acclaim as one of the true pioneers of American culture, shown through acts such as drafting the Declaration of Independence, and completing a full transition into the office of the Presidency, serving as the 3rd president of the United States. Although celebrated for these feats, Thomas Jefferson also is recognized as one of the most contradictory in terms of his positioning on race. The discussion that ensued was one about his beliefs in abolitionism, while at the same time making political moves that showed an underlying dissention for Africans, and positioned an inferiority claim regarding their physical capacities and psychological capabilities. The conversation that took place was to whether Jefferson was for the abolition of slavery or against it.
140 An obvious allusion shown is how the date in which Jefferson was to be executed is tied to an important date on the Christian calendar, Christmas. 13. “He never could have done that. I saw the transformation. I’m a witness to that.”
Undoubtedly, Grant registers the unfairness and lack of justice. Even though this is the case, Grant still continues to help Jefferson become the man he
When arguing with Reverend Ambrose Grant states, “‘I couldn’t say yes. I couldn’t lie to him at this moment. I will never tell him another lie, no matter what’” (Gaines, 217). Not only does this quote again portray Grants superb grammar, but it also highlights his intellectual morals, he believes that lying to Jefferson is wrong in his his last few weeks because he deserves respect.
Imagine be sentenced to death knowing you did nothing wrong. Imagine having to figure out what legacy you want to leave on this world when you haven't even been alive in this world for 25 years. In a Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. Gaines, this is what a 21 year old black man is expected to do when he is wrongfully accused of a crime he did not commit. He is sentenced to death and Grant and Reverend Ambrose have taken on the challenge of making this boy into a man who will die as a Christ figure the way a man should. The purpose of Jefferson’s diary at the end of the novel is to show his growth, and to prove that Grant and Reverend have done their job of making Jefferson into a man before his execution, throughout the chapter it shows his