Paul Bishop's Argument Analysis
This post relates to the argument type associated with appealing to the stated observations and opinions of experts. This type of argument is used in the text we were asked to read this week. Paul Bishop spends considerable effort relating to the arguments of the German Romantic philosophers identified in his writing. However, early on in chapter seven we are warned of the lure of using the impressions of previous experts in an effort to make an argument. With the warning in mind, we delve into the use of said experts by Bishop. The use of experts is extensive and contains some notable greats from across vast timelines.
Name dropping begins early in the article. We see that the list contains Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Eschenmayer, Passavant,
…show more content…
One way to put this is “One of the more gratifying” as Firestein goes on to say “pleasures of actually doing science is proving someone wrong— even yourself at an earlier time” (Firestein, 2012, p. 21). Remarkably, this is not the case with the article in question. We see in the article that the author is willing to make leaps in order to portray Jung as a student of Schelling. Even though he admits to Jung not listing Schelling in his work “From the list of names mentioned in Memories, Dreams, Reflections, one would appear to be missing” (Bishop, 2012, p. 336). Even with this statement, the author takes liberties with the accounts of Jung’s influence by Schelling through passages found in his writing. The article takes on the German Idealism and influences by Schelling in the section called Jung and Schelling (Bishop, 2012, p. 337). The arguments made in this section relates to the location in other texts that describe the relationship that these influential people had with Schelling’s ideas on such topics as the unconscious. In reading the sections contents we find that comments regarding the subtle references to Schelling and other German thinkers abound. We are then asked to understand the issues and subtleties between the philosophies of these
Chris Mccandless Callarman Argument Analysis
701 Words | 3 PagesCallarman’s argument is that Chris McCandless made a lot of mistakes because he was arrogant and that he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness and he says that he was just crazy. I disagree with Callarman’s argument because I think that Chris McCandless (Alexander Supertramp) was not arrogant I think that he just wanted to learn new things. I also disagree because I think that Chris did have a reason to go to Alaska or else he would not have done it even if it just to go because he likes nature, and I don’t think that he was crazy at the beginning but I agree that he did start to get crazy when he was stuck in the wild on the bus. I don’t think that Chris is arrogant I think that he is just a guy who wants to learn new things about nature and just the world in general.
NT Wright Argumentative Analysis
302 Words | 2 PagesI found it interesting that NT Wright was clarifying the differences between God’s wrath and penal substitution with reform theologian Thomas Schreiner in this video. I was a little unsure, but this video affirmed my understanding that NT Wright was a unique blend of sweet and sour flavors enhanced by hot and spicy pepper that Thomas Schreiner was hot for him to take in. I agree with NT Wright argument the wrath of God. Why? Because Wright says that the cross was about much more than Jesus absolving us of sin.
Lynn's Argumentative Analysis
259 Words | 2 PagesLynn uses the rulings of appellate courts to disprove the myth among pit bull advocates, that pit bulls are unidentifiable. The author begins the article by addressing the case of Ohio v. Anderson, and that it was decided that a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can determine if they own a dog commonly known as a pit bull. Moreover she addresses that pit bull advocates state that pit bulls are unidentifiable and that there is no such thing as a pit bull, and why this argument is not only invalid but misleading and harmful to society. Lynn states that adoption agencies have tried to create different names to signify variating subgenres of the breed in hopes to get pit bulls adopted.
Ron Unz's Argument Analysis
1608 Words | 7 PagesIn this memo I will be going over Higher Education Debates dealing with the fears of Asian quotas being imposed; as well as going over why there seems to be a trend of Asian-American parents who are more biased towards prestigious colleges. For the first article regarding Asian quotas, I will be summarizing and reflecting upon the six arguments whether it is believed that certain Ivy league schools impose a quota on the Asian-American population or not. As for the piece dealing with Asian American parent preferring Ivy League schools for their children, I will briefly summarize and discuss the cultural reasons why Asian-American parents are highly selective over their college choices for their children. In Ron Unz’s debate, he provides statistical evidence indicating that Ivy league schools place quotas on the Asian-American population
Gallaudet's Argument Analysis
627 Words | 3 PagesIn 1988, students at Gallaudet University shut down the campus in protest, with one clear goal in mind: Deaf President Now. The school board had just selected their newest president- the seventh hearing president for a school almost entirely made up of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing students- and the people were pissed. Out of three candidates, the two Deaf men under consideration had been snubbed for yet another president who didn’t come from the culture the university represented, and even worse, didn’t use their language. Let that sink in for a moment.
Don Marquis Argument Analysis
247 Words | 1 PagesDon Marquis, a theorist on abortion, debated that abortion was morally wrong and that anti-abortionists should consider fetuses’ human beings (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). He stated the term “prima facie” which is Latin for “at first glance”, which means something is accepted as true unless proven to be untrue (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). In Marquis’s argument he stated that it cannot be proven nor disproven that a fetus is considered a living being.
John Proctor's Argumentative Analysis
404 Words | 2 PagesToday in the news we have many new accusations that have come up and lots of new evidence. Some very substantial accusations were made against John proctor and this quiet, peaceful farmer is starting to appear to be more devious and menacing than originally believed. As Proctor entered the court Pariss immediately voiced his concerns about what Proctor being a true Christian. When proctor proclamed he was a devout Gospel Christian Paris proclamed, “Such a Christian that will not come to church but once in a month!
Gretchen Weirob's Argument Analysis
357 Words | 2 PagesGretchen Weirob’s argument is based on the view that physical identification is more important towards personal identity rather than psychological features. For example, Weirob believes that a person can identify with their body because they can see their body and it’s certain capacity; the body is very rational. Which is why she would not want her brain to be put into someone else’s body. She believes the body is the unique differentiation to an individual’s identification. Her argument becomes clear when she discusses the idea that someone can be manipulated, put under hypnosis or delusional to think that a different body from Weirob’s is Gretchen Weirob.
Cady Stanton's Argument Analysis
255 Words | 2 PagesThroughout history men have oppressed women taking away their rights and being treated as second class citizens. In 1848,at the Senca fallls convention the Declartion of sentiments was signed to gain equal .The Author Cady Stanton based the Declartion of sentiments on the Declartion of Independance and through the use of anaphora she conveys the idea that womenhave been oppresed and should have the same rights as any other citizen. Throughout the text Stanton uses anaphora to great extent to demonstrate the way women have been treated as second class citizens. There are many examples of this in the text,but one that shows that women had no voice is:”He has compelled here to submit to laws, in the formation of which she has had no voice.”
Dobson's Argument Analysis
420 Words | 2 PagesDobson’s words can resonate with young and older Christians. The politically correct, liberals, or the Christian left may perceive his words to be ungracious and condemning; whereas, the word of God clearly dictates acts that are sinful and should not be tolerated (Galatians 5: 19-21). Dobson challenges Christians to stand up as Jesus did since truth by nature is intolerant of falsehood. If being intolerant means agreeing with condemning abhorrent behavior as God mandates in the scriptures (e.g., homosexuality, abortion, sexual perversion), then yes, it is okay to be intolerant. Tolerance is not encouraged in the Bible considering God is not tolerant; ergo, tolerance in itself is not loving, since tolerance denies justice (Kruger, 2013).
Chris Mccandless Argument Essay
490 Words | 2 PagesIn the novel, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, Cellarmans argues that Chris McCandless has been “bright and ignorant” (Callarman). I disagree with Cellarmans’ argument, because Chris McCandless wasn't bright and ignorant, he just wanted to be free in Alaska without his family. McCandless family where judgmental and ignorant towards him, although he did not let that get towards him as well as affecting him as much. It is often to say that McCandless wrote quotes every day because he wanted to say at the time what he felt.
Paul Bogard's Argument Analysis
117 Words | 1 PagesIn his argumentative essay, Paul Bogard uses literacy diction and allusions to give credibility to his argument. By using words like Van Gogh, “Starry night sky”, and given. These words evoke a feeling of recollection. Also using the words van Gogh, Paul gives his paper further credibility all while persuading the audience to be on his side. Furthermore Paul also uses imagery in his argument to evoke a feeling of both sadness and a feeling of missing out.
Ben Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesIn Ben Robert-Smith’s opinion piece published in the Herald Sun on the 16th of January, 2017 “We Are One but We Are Many”, Robert- Smith addresses he Addresses the Australian public with the argument that is changing the date of Australia day from January 26th. He argues that the date should remain the same but should be undertaken in a manner that is “inclusive and respectful” of other Australian’s interpretation of the day. Comparatively, in Kevin V. Russell’s Letter to the Editor he presents the argument from an alternate perspective.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesThis paper will discuss the problem of evil. In the first part, I will discuss Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheist stance and William Lane Craig’s theist stance on the problem of evil. In the final part of this paper, I will argue that Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s argument is stronger. The Problem of Evil
John Tierney's Argument Analysis
348 Words | 2 PagesJohn Tierney’s piece is very interesting. It goes against I and many other people have been taught when it comes to recycling. As I read his article I kept saying to myself, oh wow, I never taught of that or that is an interesting perspective. When it comes to the environment I am not someone who keeps up with it
More about Paul Bishop's Argument Analysis
Chris Mccandless Callarman Argument Analysis
701 Words | 3 PagesNT Wright Argumentative Analysis
302 Words | 2 PagesLynn's Argumentative Analysis
259 Words | 2 PagesRon Unz's Argument Analysis
1608 Words | 7 PagesGallaudet's Argument Analysis
627 Words | 3 PagesDon Marquis Argument Analysis
247 Words | 1 PagesJohn Proctor's Argumentative Analysis
404 Words | 2 PagesGretchen Weirob's Argument Analysis
357 Words | 2 PagesCady Stanton's Argument Analysis
255 Words | 2 PagesDobson's Argument Analysis
420 Words | 2 PagesChris Mccandless Argument Essay
490 Words | 2 PagesPaul Bogard's Argument Analysis
117 Words | 1 PagesBen Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesWalter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesJohn Tierney's Argument Analysis
348 Words | 2 Pages