A prominent issue in today’s society is the question of whether or not student athletes should be paid. Many people today are pushing toward payment for these student athletes, who are required to fill the roles of being both a full time student and athlete. Those who are against the payment of student athletes believe that pay could distort their ideals, diminish their passion for the game, and be detrimental for their general well-being. There is a fear that paying student athletes would make the difference between college athletics and professional sports undistinguishable. Many athletes might miss out on valuable and important lessons learned while being a student athlete if they are constantly faced with the pressure to generate money …show more content…
I plan to research several questions in an attempt to further my knowledge on this issue in hope to find a better solution. First, a question that must be addressed is how would the payment of student athletes affect the universities? Do all universities generate enough money to pay these student athletes? By comparing revenue between smaller and larger universities, it would help reveal the details of the universities financial statuses and their ability to pay student athletes. To find this information, I will look for university financial records from credible online sources. I can even specifically search for the University of Oklahoma to discover how this issue would impact our own university. Secondly, how would the payment of student athletes affect the athletes themselves? Finding stories and articles from credible news outlets on their mindset, performance, and values when pay becomes involved will be crucial in finding the influence of money, especially on young adults. Looking at the other side of this issue, if student athletes were to get paid, whose job would it be to pay these student athletes? The universities or the NCAA? Also, how much would they get paid and who would determine this? Furthermore, would the payment of student athletes conflict with the values of the NCAA? By researching the background and history of the NCAA and amateurism, I will be able to find the original intent of the NCAA. Also, there has been controversial court cases over this issue that will be important to look into through the use of Google Scholar or other credible online sources. Lastly, would paying student athletes be a substitute for their scholarships? How would trading educational focus for salaries be ethical? Understanding the benefits of scholarships and comprehending more about what they provide for student athletes through sources such as EBSCOhost and
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
Currently there are 460,000 student athletes in the U.S. according to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Most of these student athletes along with many other people think that they should get paid money by the university that they are attending or by the NCAA for playing a sport for the college and making the college money in that sport. On the other hand, there are also people who think that these college/student athletes should not get paid for many reasons. Most reasons are because the athletes are already accepting scholarships, paying athletes takes away from the purity of game, and the universities should be treating the college athletes the same as their college peers within the school. College students should not get paid because they most likely are accepting scholarships, paying the athletes takes away from the purity of the game, and colleges should be treating the athletes
Football, basketball, and baseball, in particular, generate billions of dollars a year for colleges in ticket sales, merchandise sales, and advertisements” (Drew 1). Because of how much money is being earned by a school, college athletes could earn some of this money. But, the school might use the money on other things such as campus needs. But, “ensuring that student-athletes are paid may not only alleviate the financial burden that some families face when sending their children to college. It may also encourage college athletes to stay for education before going pro” (Bouchrika 4).
If college athletes were getting paid, more than likely other students would have to pay more in tuition and in other fees. Athletes getting paid would create the misunderstanding that getting an education would be less important than trying to get involved in a sport. The importance of academics would go straight down the drain. Along with all of these points, the majority of college athletes already technically get paid through scholarship money.
College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
For instance, the average college athlete can access free housing and food. If universities were to start paying students, they would be no different from employees, changing the idea of college athletics as the next big market. Colleges will be fixated on having the best athletes, looking at athletes as a money investment rather than students with amazing opportunities.
The author centers around the system of how wages would actually be worth less than that of scholarship benefits and that the increase in wage demand for athletes would put universities under financial pressure. He mentions those who support paying college athletes for their hard-earned work and those who do not when he states that “On the surface it seems ideal and fair to pay college athletes for the hours of labor they put in each week; however, it’s important to analyze the trickle down of effects such a drastic change would cause.” (Marcus) By addressing both sides of the argument, Marcus lets his readers know that he is aware of athletes deserving a salary, but remains in his stance against the topic. He refers to sports fans in particular who disregard and ignore the actual complications that would be caused if the NCAA were to pay college athletes.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
College athletes already get their education free why should they get paid for playing a sport they love playing. What do you think, should college athletes get paid for playing the sport there in? Well I don’t think so and in this paper I will tell you and give you reasons why they shouldn’t be paid. College athletes are already getting a free education they shouldn’t be allowed to be paid. My topic is why college athletes shouldn’t get paid.
If colleges were to be unionized and paying student-athletes, the money to pay